Association of preeclampsia with anthropometric measures and blood pressure in Indian children.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
13
01
2020
accepted:
03
04
2020
entrez:
6
5
2020
pubmed:
6
5
2020
medline:
28
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Birth weight and post-natal growth are important predictors of adult health. Preeclampsia (PE) is associated with low birth weight and may have long term effects on the health of the children. The current study aims to compare anthropometry and blood pressure between children of mothers with and without PE in an Indian cohort. We studied children born to women with (PE; n = 211) and without preeclampsia (non-PE; n = 470) at Bharati Hospital, Pune, India. Anthropometry and blood pressure were measured in children at 3-7 years of age. Weight and height Z-scores were calculated using the WHO 2006 growth reference. Independent t-tests were used to compare means between the two groups, and associations between preeclampsia and child outcomes were analyzed using multiple linear regression, adjusting for potential confounders. Weight and height Z-scores (p = 0.04 and 0.008), and subscapular skinfold thickness (p = 0.03) were higher among children of PE compared with children of non-PE mothers. Systolic blood pressure was also higher in children of PE mothers (1.70 mmHg [95% CI 0.05, 2.90] p = 0.006). BMI and diastolic blood pressure did not differ between groups. In regression models adjusted for newborn weight and gestational age, current age and sex, and maternal height, BMI and socio-economic status, children of PE mothers had higher weight Z-score (0.27 SD [95%CI 0.06, 0.48] p = 0.01), height Z-score (0.28 SD [95%CI 0.09, 0.47] p = 0.005), and subscapular skinfold thickness (0.38 mm [95%CI 0.00, 0.76] p = 0.049). A trend for higher systolic blood pressure (1.59 mmHg [95%CI -0.02, 3.20] p = 0.053) in the children was also observed in the adjusted model. The difference in systolic blood pressure was attenuated after adjusting further for the child's weight and height (1.09 mmHg [95%CI -0.48, 2.67] p = 0.17). There was no evidence of differences in effects between boys and girls. Children of PE mothers were taller and heavier, and had higher systolic blood pressure, partly explained by their increased body size, than children of non-PE mothers. In utero exposure to preeclampsia may increase the risk of future cardiovascular disease.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
Birth weight and post-natal growth are important predictors of adult health. Preeclampsia (PE) is associated with low birth weight and may have long term effects on the health of the children. The current study aims to compare anthropometry and blood pressure between children of mothers with and without PE in an Indian cohort.
METHODS
We studied children born to women with (PE; n = 211) and without preeclampsia (non-PE; n = 470) at Bharati Hospital, Pune, India. Anthropometry and blood pressure were measured in children at 3-7 years of age. Weight and height Z-scores were calculated using the WHO 2006 growth reference. Independent t-tests were used to compare means between the two groups, and associations between preeclampsia and child outcomes were analyzed using multiple linear regression, adjusting for potential confounders.
RESULTS
Weight and height Z-scores (p = 0.04 and 0.008), and subscapular skinfold thickness (p = 0.03) were higher among children of PE compared with children of non-PE mothers. Systolic blood pressure was also higher in children of PE mothers (1.70 mmHg [95% CI 0.05, 2.90] p = 0.006). BMI and diastolic blood pressure did not differ between groups. In regression models adjusted for newborn weight and gestational age, current age and sex, and maternal height, BMI and socio-economic status, children of PE mothers had higher weight Z-score (0.27 SD [95%CI 0.06, 0.48] p = 0.01), height Z-score (0.28 SD [95%CI 0.09, 0.47] p = 0.005), and subscapular skinfold thickness (0.38 mm [95%CI 0.00, 0.76] p = 0.049). A trend for higher systolic blood pressure (1.59 mmHg [95%CI -0.02, 3.20] p = 0.053) in the children was also observed in the adjusted model. The difference in systolic blood pressure was attenuated after adjusting further for the child's weight and height (1.09 mmHg [95%CI -0.48, 2.67] p = 0.17). There was no evidence of differences in effects between boys and girls.
CONCLUSION
Children of PE mothers were taller and heavier, and had higher systolic blood pressure, partly explained by their increased body size, than children of non-PE mothers. In utero exposure to preeclampsia may increase the risk of future cardiovascular disease.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32369488
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231989
pii: PONE-D-20-01076
pmc: PMC7199948
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0231989Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_12011/3
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : G0400519
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 098575/Z/12/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UP_A620_1016
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_U147585821
Pays : United Kingdom
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
J Hum Hypertens. 2012 May;26(5):288-94
pubmed: 21509041
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 Apr;70(4):414-22
pubmed: 26347276
Pediatrics. 2012 Jun;129(6):e1552-61
pubmed: 22614768
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 13;13(2):e0192514
pubmed: 29438394
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991 Oct;98(10):1009-14
pubmed: 1751432
Circulation. 2010 Aug 3;122(5):488-94
pubmed: 20644018
Lipids. 2016 Jan;51(1):85-94
pubmed: 26626477
Indian Pediatr. 2018 Nov 15;55(11):975-978
pubmed: 30587647
Transl Res. 2015 Apr;165(4):449-63
pubmed: 25468481
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006 Nov;91(11):4645-9
pubmed: 16912131
Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Mar;101(3):529-33
pubmed: 12636958
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003 Mar;88(3):1217-22
pubmed: 12629109
J Pediatr. 2013 May;162(5):912-7.e1
pubmed: 23211927
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jul 4;70(1):1-25
pubmed: 28527533
Eur Heart J. 2012 Feb;33(3):335-45
pubmed: 21862461
Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2011 Sep-Oct;85(3-4):149-53
pubmed: 21816593
J Hypertens. 2009 Oct;27(10):2051-4
pubmed: 19609220
Lancet. 2008 Jan 19;371(9608):243-60
pubmed: 18207566
PLoS One. 2017 May 9;12(5):e0176627
pubmed: 28486480
BMJ. 1995 Jul 15;311(6998):171-4
pubmed: 7613432
Int J Pediatr. 2013;2013:953150
pubmed: 23690796
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 27;11(1):e0147359
pubmed: 26815428
J Thromb Haemost. 2009 Mar;7(3):375-84
pubmed: 19087223
Am J Clin Nutr. 2011 Dec;94(6 Suppl):1754S-1758S
pubmed: 21525196
Can J Cardiol. 2015 Sep;31(9):1081-93
pubmed: 26321432
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2018 Apr;72(4):469-473
pubmed: 29410478
Pregnancy Hypertens. 2018 Apr;12:11-15
pubmed: 29674189
Circulation. 2010 Sep 21;122(12):1192-9
pubmed: 20823385
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Jan 30;7(3):
pubmed: 29382664
Early Hum Dev. 1989 Jul;19(4):263-9
pubmed: 2806155
Hypertens Res. 2010 Jun;33(6):561-7
pubmed: 20224572
Hypertension. 2017 Apr;69(4):591-598
pubmed: 28223467
Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2014 Jul-Aug;91(1-2):21-30
pubmed: 24928794
Hypertension. 2013 Sep;62(3):614-20
pubmed: 23918754
Pediatr Res. 2001 Jun;49(6):763-9
pubmed: 11385135
Lancet. 1993 Apr 10;341(8850):938-41
pubmed: 8096277
DNA Cell Biol. 2011 Feb;30(2):79-84
pubmed: 21043832
Biol Reprod. 2016 Mar;94(3):53
pubmed: 26792940
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008 Mar;100(3):234-8
pubmed: 17977540
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2012 Oct;34(10):917-926
pubmed: 23067947