Selective carbon sources influence the end products of microbial nitrate respiration.


Journal

The ISME journal
ISSN: 1751-7370
Titre abrégé: ISME J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101301086

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2020
Historique:
received: 06 01 2020
accepted: 22 04 2020
revised: 31 03 2020
pubmed: 7 5 2020
medline: 22 12 2020
entrez: 7 5 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Respiratory and catabolic genes are differentially distributed across microbial genomes. Thus, specific carbon sources may favor different respiratory processes. We profiled the influence of 94 carbon sources on the end products of nitrate respiration in microbial enrichment cultures from diverse terrestrial environments. We found that some carbon sources consistently favor dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA/nitrate ammonification) while other carbon sources favor nitrite accumulation or denitrification. For an enrichment culture from aquatic sediment, we sequenced the genomes of the most abundant strains, matched these genomes to 16S rDNA exact sequence variants (ESVs), and used 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing to track the differential enrichment of functionally distinct ESVs on different carbon sources. We found that changes in the abundances of strains with different genetic potentials for nitrite accumulation, DNRA or denitrification were correlated with the nitrite or ammonium concentrations in the enrichment cultures recovered on different carbon sources. Specifically, we found that either L-sorbose or D-cellobiose enriched for a Klebsiella nitrite accumulator, other sugars enriched for an Escherichia nitrate ammonifier, and citrate or formate enriched for a Pseudomonas denitrifier and a Sulfurospirillum nitrate ammonifier. Our results add important nuance to the current paradigm that higher concentrations of carbon will always favor DNRA over denitrification or nitrite accumulation, and we propose that, in some cases, carbon composition can be as important as carbon concentration in determining nitrate respiratory end products. Furthermore, our approach can be extended to other environments and metabolisms to characterize how selective parameters influence microbial community composition, gene content, and function.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32372050
doi: 10.1038/s41396-020-0666-7
pii: 10.1038/s41396-020-0666-7
pmc: PMC7368043
doi:

Substances chimiques

Ammonium Compounds 0
Nitrates 0
Nitrites 0
Carbon 7440-44-0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2034-2045

Références

Yoon S, Cruz-García C, Sanford R, Ritalahti KM, Löffler FE. Denitrification versus respiratory ammonification: environmental controls of two competing dissimilatory NO
pubmed: 25350157 doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.201
van denBerg EM, Boleij M, Kuenen JG, Kleerebezem R, van Loosdrecht MCM. DNRA and denitrification coexist over a broad range of acetate/N-NO
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01622
van den Berg EM, Elisário MP, Kuenen JG, Kleerebezem R, van Loosdrecht MCM. Fermentative bacteria influence the competition between denitrifiers and DNRA bacteria. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1303–13.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01303
Kraft B, Tegetmeyer HE, Sharma R, Klotz MG, Ferdelman TG, Hettich RL, et al. Nitrogen cycling. The environmental controls that govern the end product of bacterial nitrate respiration. Science. 2014;345:676–9.
pubmed: 25104387 doi: 10.1126/science.1254070
Tiedje JM, Sexstone AJ, Myrold DD, Robinson JA. Denitrification: ecological niches, competition and survival. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 1982;48:569–83.
pubmed: 6762848 doi: 10.1007/BF00399542
Tugtas AE, Pavlostathis SG. Electron donor effect on nitrate reduction pathway and kinetics in a mixed methanogenic culture. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2007;98:756–63.
pubmed: 17492695 doi: 10.1002/bit.21487
Akunna JC, Bizeau C, Moletta R. Nitrate and nitrite reductions with anaerobic sludge using various carbon sources: Glucose, glycerol, acetic acid, lactic acid and methanol. Water Res. 1993;27:1303–12.
doi: 10.1016/0043-1354(93)90217-6
Kelso B, Smith RV, Laughlin RJ, Lennox SD. Dissimilatory nitrate reduction in anaerobic sediments leading to river nitrite accumulation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997;63:4679–85.
pubmed: 16535749 pmcid: 1389305 doi: 10.1128/aem.63.12.4679-4685.1997
Vuono DC, Read RW, Hemp J, Sullivan BW, Arnone JAI, Neveux I, et al. Resource concentration modulates the fate of dissimilated nitrogen in a dual-pathway actinobacterium. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:175.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00175
Nelson MB, Martiny AC, Martiny JBH. Global biogeography of microbial nitrogen-cycling traits in soil. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:8033–40.
pubmed: 27432978 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1601070113 pmcid: 4961168
Octavia S, Lan R. The family Enterobacteriaceae. In: Rosenburg E, Delong EF, Lory S, Stackebrandt E, Thompson F, editors. The prokaryotes. New York: Springer; 2006.
Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT, Garrity GM, editors. Bergey’s Manual® of Systematic Bacteriology: Volume Two: The Proteobacteria, Part A Introductory Essays. Springer-Verlag US; 2005.
Zhalnina K, Louie KB, Hao Z, Mansoori N, da Rocha UN, Shi S, et al. Dynamic root exudate chemistry and microbial substrate preferences drive patterns in rhizosphere microbial community assembly. Nat Microbiol. 2018;3:470–80.
pubmed: 29556109 doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0129-3
Watson DB, Wu W-M, Mehlhorn T, Tang G, Earles J, Lowe K, et al. In situ bioremediation of uranium with emulsified vegetable oil as the electron donor. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47:6440–8.
pubmed: 23697787 doi: 10.1021/es3033555
Li B, Wu W-M, Watson DB, Cardenas E, Chao Y, Phillips DH, et al. Bacterial community shift and coexisting/coexcluding patterns revealed by network analysis in a uranium-contaminated site after bioreduction followed by reoxidation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018;84:2885–17.
Williams KH, Long PE, Davis JA, Wilkins MJ, N’Guessan AL, Steefel CI, et al. Acetate availability and its influence on sustainable bioremediation of uranium-contaminated groundwater. Geomicrobiol J. 2011;28:519–39.
doi: 10.1080/01490451.2010.520074
Williams KH, Bargar JR, Lloyd JR, Lovley DR. Bioremediation of uranium-contaminated groundwater: a systems approach to subsurface biogeochemistry. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2013;24:489–97.
pubmed: 23159488 doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2012.10.008
Sandefur CA, Koenigsberg SS. The use of hydrogen release compound for the accelerated bioremediation of anaerobically degradable contaminants: the advent of time‐release electron donors. Remediat J. 1999;10:31–53.
doi: 10.1002/rem.3440100104
Flynn TM, Koval JC, Greenwald SM, Owens SM, Kemner KM, Antonopoulos DA. Parallelized, aerobic, single carbon-source enrichments from different natural environments contain divergent microbial communities. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1540.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02321
Wawrik B, Kerkhof L, Kukor J, Zylstra G. Effect of different carbon sources on community composition of bacterial enrichments from soil. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:6776–83.
pubmed: 16269709 pmcid: 1287611 doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.11.6776-6783.2005
Goldfarb KC, Karaoz U, Hanson CA, Santee CA, Bardford MA, Treseder KK, et al. Differential growth responses of soil bacterial taxa to carbon substrates of varying chemical recalcitrance. Front Microbiol. 2011;2:94.
pubmed: 21833332 pmcid: 3153052 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00094
Goldford JE, Lu N, Bajić D, Estrela S, Tikhonov M, Sanchez-Gorostiaga A, et al. Emergent simplicity in microbial community assembly. Science. 2018;361:469–74.
pubmed: 30072533 pmcid: 6405290 doi: 10.1126/science.aat1168
Price MN, Wetmore KM, Waters RJ, Callaghan M, Ray J, Liu H, et al. Mutant phenotypes for thousands of bacterial genes of unknown function. Nature. 2018;557:503–9.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0124-0 pubmed: 29769716
Carlson H, Deutschbauer A, Coates J. Microbial metal resistance and metabolism across dynamic landscapes: high-throughput environmental microbiology. F1000Res. 2017;6:1026–8.
pubmed: 28721211 pmcid: 5497819 doi: 10.12688/f1000research.10986.1
Carlson HK, Stoeva MK, Justice NB, Sczesnak A, Mullan MR, Mosqueda LA, et al. Monofluorophosphate is a selective inhibitor of respiratory sulfate-reducing microorganisms. Environ Sci Technol. 2015;49:3727–36.
pubmed: 25698072 doi: 10.1021/es505843z
Carlson HK, Kuehl JV, Hazra AB, Justice NB, Stoeva MK, Sczesnak A, et al. Mechanisms of direct inhibition of the respiratory sulfate-reduction pathway by (per)chlorate and nitrate. ISME J. 2014;9:1295–305.
pubmed: 25405978 pmcid: 4438318 doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.216
Rivett DW, Bell T. Abundance determines the functional role of bacterial phylotypes in complex communities. Nat Microbiol. 2018;3:767–72.
pubmed: 29915204 pmcid: 6065991 doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0180-0
Sims GK, Ellsworth TR, Mulvaney RL. Microscale determination of inorganic nitrogen in water and soil extracts. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2008;26:303–16.
doi: 10.1080/00103629509369298
Carlson HK, Price MN, Callaghan M, Aaring A, Chakraborty R, Liu H, et al. The selective pressures on the microbial community in a metal-contaminated aquifer. ISME J. 2018;13:937–49.
pubmed: 30523276 pmcid: 6461962 doi: 10.1038/s41396-018-0328-1
Milo R, Jorgensen P, Moran U, Weber G, Springer M. BioNumbers—the database of key numbers in molecular and cell biology. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;38:750–3.
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp889
Soini J, Ukkonen K, Neubauer P. High cell density media for Escherichia coli are generally designed for aerobic cultivations – consequences for large-scale bioprocesses and shake flask cultures. Microb Cell Factories. 2008;7:26–11.
doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-7-26
Glazyrina J, Materne E-M, Dreher T, Storm D, Junne S, Adams T, et al. High cell density cultivation and recombinant protein production with Escherichia coli in a rocking-motion-type bioreactor. Microb Cell Factories. 2010;9:42–11.
doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-9-42
Redfield AC. The biological control of chemical factors in the environment. Am Sci. 1958;46:205–21.
PAUL EA. Soil microbiology, ecology, and biochemistry in perspective. In Soil Microbiology, Ecology and Biochemistry 2007 Jan 1 (pp. 3–24). Academic Press.
Venturelli OS, Carr AV, Fisher G, Hsu RH, Lau R, Bowen BP, et al. Deciphering microbial interactions in synthetic human gut microbiome communities. Mol Syst Biol. 2018;14:e8157.
pubmed: 29930200 pmcid: 6011841 doi: 10.15252/msb.20178157
Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol. 2017;13:e1005595–22.
pubmed: 28594827 pmcid: 5481147 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595
Nurk S, Meleshko D, Korobeynikov A, Pevzner PA. metaSPAdes: a new versatile metagenomic assembler. Genome Res. 2017;2:824–34.
doi: 10.1101/gr.213959.116
Kang DD, Li F, Kirton E, Thomas A, Egan R, An H, et al. MetaBAT 2: an adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies. PeerJ. 2019;7:e7359–13.
pubmed: 31388474 pmcid: 6662567 doi: 10.7717/peerj.7359
Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Waite DW, Rinke C, Skarshewski A, Chaumeil P-A, et al. A standardized bacterial taxonomy based on genome phylogeny substantially revises the tree of life. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36:996–1004.
pubmed: 30148503 doi: 10.1038/nbt.4229
Yilmaz P, Parfrey LW, Yarza P, Gerken J, Pruesse E, Quast C, et al. The SILVA and “All-species Living Tree Project (LTP)” taxonomic frameworks. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;42:D643–8.
pubmed: 24293649 pmcid: 3965112 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1209
Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25:1043–55.
pubmed: 25977477 pmcid: 4484387 doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114
Overbeek R. The subsystems approach to genome annotation and its use in the project to annotate 1000 genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:5691–702.
pubmed: 16214803 pmcid: 1251668 doi: 10.1093/nar/gki866
Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Kawashima M, Furumichi M, Tanabe M. KEGG as a reference resource for gene and protein annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D457–62.
pubmed: 26476454 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1070
Fu L, Niu B, Zhu Z, Wu S, Li W. CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:3150–2.
pubmed: 23060610 pmcid: 3516142 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565
Buchfink B, Xie C, Huson DH. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat Methods. 2015;12:59–60.
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3176 pubmed: 25402007
Mendler K, Chen H, Parks DH, Lobb B, Hug LA, Doxey AC. AnnoTree: visualization and exploration of a functionally annotated microbial tree of life. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:4442–8.
pubmed: 31081040 pmcid: 6511854 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz246
Sprenger GA, Lengeler JW. L-Sorbose metabolism in Klebsiella pneumoniae and Sor+ derivatives of Escherichia coli K-12 and chemotaxis toward sorbose. J Bacteriol. 1984;157:39–45.
pubmed: 6361004 pmcid: 215126 doi: 10.1128/jb.157.1.39-45.1984
Paul JW, Beauchamp EG, Trevors JT. Acetate, propionate, butyrate, glucose, and sucrose as carbon sources for denitrifying bacteria in soil. Can J Microbiol. 1989;35:754–9.
doi: 10.1139/m89-126
Bott M. Anaerobic citrate metabolism and its regulation in Enterobacteria. Arch Microbiol. 1997;167:78–88.
pubmed: 9133329 doi: 10.1007/s002030050419
Goris T, Diekert G. The Genus Sulfurospirillum. In: Adrian L, Löffler FE, editors. Organohalide-respiring bacteria. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2016. pp. 209–34.
Perry W, Broers A, El-Baz F, Harris W, Healy B. Grand challenges for engineering. Washington, DC: National Academy of Engineering; 2017.
Gruber N, Galloway JN. An Earth-system perspective of the global nitrogen cycle. Nature. 2008;451:293–6.
pubmed: 18202647 doi: 10.1038/nature06592
Rehr B, Klemme J-H. Competition for nitrate between denitrifying Pseudomonas stutzeri and nitrate ammonifying Enterobacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1989;62:51–7.
doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1989.tb03657.x

Auteurs

Hans K Carlson (HK)

Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA. HKCarlson@lbl.gov.

Lauren M Lui (LM)

Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.

Morgan N Price (MN)

Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.

Alexey E Kazakov (AE)

Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.

Alex V Carr (AV)

Institute for Systems Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.
Molecular Engineering Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA.

Jennifer V Kuehl (JV)

Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.

Trenton K Owens (TK)

Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.

Torben Nielsen (T)

Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.

Adam P Arkin (AP)

Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.

Adam M Deutschbauer (AM)

Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA. AMDeutschbauer@lbl.gov.
Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA. AMDeutschbauer@lbl.gov.

Articles similaires

India Carbon Sequestration Environmental Monitoring Carbon Biomass
Charcoal Soil Microbiology Soil Biomass Carbon
Humans Pancreatic Neoplasms Proton Therapy Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated
Aluminum Carbon Quantum Dots Spectrometry, Fluorescence Limit of Detection

Classifications MeSH