The prognostic value of preoperative fibrinogen-to-prealbumin ratio and a novel FFC score in patients with resectable gastric cancer.


Journal

BMC cancer
ISSN: 1471-2407
Titre abrégé: BMC Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967800

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 May 2020
Historique:
received: 12 11 2019
accepted: 14 04 2020
entrez: 8 5 2020
pubmed: 8 5 2020
medline: 3 2 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Chronic inflammation is considered as a hallmark of gastric cancer (GC) and plays a critical role in GC progression and metastasis. This study aimed to explore the prognostic values of preoperative fibrinogen-to-prealbumin ratio (FPR), fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio (FAR), and novel FPR-FAR-CEA (FFC) score in patients with GC undergoing gastrectomy. A total of 273 patients with resectable GC were included in this retrospective study. We performed Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses to assess the prognostic role of preoperative FPR, FAR, and FFC score in patients with GC and analyze their relationships with clinicopathological features. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis revealed that the optimal cutoff values for FPR and FAR were 0.0145 and 0.0784, respectively. The FFC score had a higher area under the ROC curve than FAR and CEA. Elevated FPR (≥ 0.0145) and FAR (≥ 0.0784) were significantly associated with old age, large tumor size, tumor invasion depth, lymph nodes metastasis, advanced TNM stage, large Borrmann type, and anemia status. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that high FPR, FAR, and FFC score were related to poor survival. Multivariate analyses indicated that FPR, FFC score, TNM stage, and tumor size were significant independent factors for survival. Preoperative FPR and FFC score could be used as prospective noninvasive prognostic biomarkers for resectable GC.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Chronic inflammation is considered as a hallmark of gastric cancer (GC) and plays a critical role in GC progression and metastasis. This study aimed to explore the prognostic values of preoperative fibrinogen-to-prealbumin ratio (FPR), fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio (FAR), and novel FPR-FAR-CEA (FFC) score in patients with GC undergoing gastrectomy.
METHODS METHODS
A total of 273 patients with resectable GC were included in this retrospective study. We performed Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses to assess the prognostic role of preoperative FPR, FAR, and FFC score in patients with GC and analyze their relationships with clinicopathological features.
RESULTS RESULTS
Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis revealed that the optimal cutoff values for FPR and FAR were 0.0145 and 0.0784, respectively. The FFC score had a higher area under the ROC curve than FAR and CEA. Elevated FPR (≥ 0.0145) and FAR (≥ 0.0784) were significantly associated with old age, large tumor size, tumor invasion depth, lymph nodes metastasis, advanced TNM stage, large Borrmann type, and anemia status. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that high FPR, FAR, and FFC score were related to poor survival. Multivariate analyses indicated that FPR, FFC score, TNM stage, and tumor size were significant independent factors for survival.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Preoperative FPR and FFC score could be used as prospective noninvasive prognostic biomarkers for resectable GC.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32375697
doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06866-6
pii: 10.1186/s12885-020-06866-6
pmc: PMC7201974
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biomarkers, Tumor 0
Prealbumin 0
Fibrinogen 9001-32-5

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

382

Subventions

Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 81872427
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 81672428
Organisme : Haiyan Fund Project of Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital
ID : JJQN2019-02
Organisme : Haiyan Fund Project of Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital
ID : JJZD2020-17
Organisme : Health Commission of Heilongjiang
ID : 2019-060

Références

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 May;23(5):700-13
pubmed: 24618998
BMC Cancer. 2016 Jul 14;16:480
pubmed: 27418164
Gastric Cancer. 2017 Mar;20(2):254-262
pubmed: 27147244
Cancer Epidemiol. 2016 Jun;42:39-45
pubmed: 27010728
J Cancer. 2017 Apr 8;8(6):1025-1029
pubmed: 28529615
Cancer Manag Res. 2018 Jul 19;10:2151-2161
pubmed: 30050325
J Natl Med Assoc. 2001 Dec;93(12):490-3
pubmed: 11800279
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Mar 15;23(6):1575-1585
pubmed: 27620275
Cancer Biomark. 2015;15(6):899-907
pubmed: 26444485
J Control Release. 2015 Aug 10;211:144-62
pubmed: 26055641
BMC Cancer. 2019 Mar 29;19(1):288
pubmed: 30925910
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2017 Sep;1404(1):27-48
pubmed: 28833193
Cancer Sci. 2016 Apr;107(4):391-7
pubmed: 27079437
Gastric Cancer. 2019 Mar;22(2):403-412
pubmed: 29982861
Gastric Cancer. 2018 Mar;21(2):204-212
pubmed: 28656485
J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jun;117(8):1697-1707
pubmed: 29761518
J Immunol Res. 2018 May 22;2018:4925498
pubmed: 30027102
Br J Cancer. 2012 Jul 10;107(2):275-9
pubmed: 22713657
Gut. 2015 Oct;64(10):1650-68
pubmed: 26342014
Mol Cancer. 2017 Aug 15;16(1):137
pubmed: 28810877
Clin Nutr. 2008 Jun;27(3):398-407
pubmed: 18436350
BMC Cancer. 2018 Mar 13;18(1):285
pubmed: 29534689
Int J Cancer. 2014 Mar 15;134(6):1445-57
pubmed: 24009139
Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2015 May;12(5):793-812
pubmed: 25518870
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Nov;11(11):664-74
pubmed: 25134511
J Transl Med. 2015 Feb 18;13:66
pubmed: 25885254
Chin J Cancer Res. 2018 Feb;30(1):1-12
pubmed: 29545714
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Aug;17(9):1894-1901.e1
pubmed: 30708109
BMC Cancer. 2018 Oct 3;18(1):942
pubmed: 30285656
Gastroenterology. 2020 Jan;158(1):76-94.e2
pubmed: 31593701
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 May;44(5):566-570
pubmed: 29530345
Cell Commun Signal. 2017 Apr 20;15(1):15
pubmed: 28427431
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424
pubmed: 30207593
Aging (Albany NY). 2019 Mar 21;11(6):1716-1732
pubmed: 30897064
Onco Targets Ther. 2017 Apr 13;10:2155-2162
pubmed: 28458559

Auteurs

Shuli Tang (S)

Department of Medical Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, No. 150, Haping Road, Nangang District, Harbin, 150001, China.

Lin Lin (L)

Department of Medical Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, No. 150, Haping Road, Nangang District, Harbin, 150001, China.

Jianan Cheng (J)

Department of Medical Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, No. 150, Haping Road, Nangang District, Harbin, 150001, China.

Juan Zhao (J)

Department of Medical Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, No. 150, Haping Road, Nangang District, Harbin, 150001, China.

Qijia Xuan (Q)

Department of Medical Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, No. 150, Haping Road, Nangang District, Harbin, 150001, China.

Jiayue Shao (J)

Department of Medical Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, No. 150, Haping Road, Nangang District, Harbin, 150001, China.

Yang Zhou (Y)

Department of Radiology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, No. 150, Haping Road, Nangang District, Harbin, 150001, China. Zhouyang094@126.com.

Yanqiao Zhang (Y)

Department of Medical Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, No. 150, Haping Road, Nangang District, Harbin, 150001, China. yanqiaozhang@ems.hrbmu.edu.cn.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH