How phantom databases could contribute to conservation assessments.
Conservation assessments
Databank
Red list
Species conservation
Journal
Die Naturwissenschaften
ISSN: 1432-1904
Titre abrégé: Naturwissenschaften
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0400767
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 May 2020
06 May 2020
Historique:
received:
06
01
2020
accepted:
27
04
2020
revised:
06
04
2020
entrez:
8
5
2020
pubmed:
8
5
2020
medline:
16
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Reliable data are needed to produce representative and useful conservation assessments for species. To this end, taxonomists and their unpublished, archived and unused databases-here called phantom databases-have great relevance for assessing the conservation status of species. Taxonomist's phantom databases are usually the result of a review work, and, if made available, they could be used to assess a species conservation status with greater accuracy, allowing for more effective conservation planning. Here we characterise these databases, provide examples of their relevance and recommend solutions to make these phantom databases available for conservation use. Databases of taxonomic and geographic information need not be phantom and could be made openly accessible to encourage their use in conservation activities.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32378062
doi: 10.1007/s00114-020-01679-w
pii: 10.1007/s00114-020-01679-w
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM