The changing face of desktop video game monetisation: An exploration of exposure to loot boxes, pay to win, and cosmetic microtransactions in the most-played Steam games of 2010-2019.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
16
11
2019
accepted:
21
04
2020
entrez:
8
5
2020
pubmed:
8
5
2020
medline:
4
8
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
It is now common practice for video game companies to not just sell copies of games themselves, but to also sell in-game bonuses or items for a small real-world fee. These purchases may be purely aesthetic (cosmetic microtransactions) or confer in-game advantages (pay to win microtransactions), and may also contain these items as randomised contents of uncertain value (loot boxes). The growth of microtransactions has attracted substantial interest from both gamers, academics, and policymakers. However, it is not clear either how frequently exposed players are to these features in desktop games, or when any growth in exposure occurred. In order to address this, we analysed the play history of the 463 most-played Steam desktop games from 2010 to 2019. Results of exploratory joinpoint analyses suggested that cosmetic microtransactions and loot boxes experienced rapid growth during 2012-2014, leading to high levels of exposure by April 2019: 71.2% of the sample played games with loot boxes at this point, and 85.89% played games with cosmetic microtransactions. By contrast, pay to win microtransactions did not appear to experience similar growth in desktop games during the period, rising gradually to an exposure rate of 17.3% by November 2015, at which point growth decelerated significantly (p<0.001) to the point where it was not significantly different from zero (p = 0.32).
Identifiants
pubmed: 32379808
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232780
pii: PONE-D-19-30715
pmc: PMC7205278
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0232780Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Aug;2(8):530-532
pubmed: 31209310
Addict Behav. 2019 Sep;96:26-34
pubmed: 31030176
Stat Med. 2000 Feb 15;19(3):335-51
pubmed: 10649300
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 21;13(11):e0206767
pubmed: 30462669
BMC Public Health. 2011 May 14;11:314
pubmed: 21569569
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36487
pubmed: 22567159
Addiction. 2020 Jan 20;:
pubmed: 31957942
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Jun 19;6(6):190049
pubmed: 31312481
J Epidemiol. 2013;23(3):195-204
pubmed: 23604061
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2018 Jun;25(2):128-133
pubmed: 28675063
BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 28;8(9):e023144
pubmed: 30269071
Int J Cardiol. 2012 Jul 12;158(2):193-8
pubmed: 21288580
Lancet Psychiatry. 2019 Sep;6(9):724-725
pubmed: 31448750
J Gambl Stud. 2017 Jun;33(2):599-615
pubmed: 27435416
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 8;13(10):e0204813
pubmed: 30296294
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2013 Dec 09;13:112
pubmed: 24320937