Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors and the risk of urosepsis: A multi-site, prevalent new-user cohort study.


Journal

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism
ISSN: 1463-1326
Titre abrégé: Diabetes Obes Metab
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100883645

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2020
Historique:
received: 31 01 2020
revised: 29 04 2020
accepted: 01 05 2020
pubmed: 10 5 2020
medline: 25 6 2021
entrez: 9 5 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To compare urosepsis rates in patients with type 2 diabetes treated using sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) in a real-world setting. We conducted a matched cohort study using a prevalent new-user design with time-conditional propensity scores. New users of SGLT2i from seven Canadian provinces and the UK were matched to DPP4i users. The primary outcome was hospitalization with a diagnosis of urosepsis and the secondary outcome was Fournier's gangrene. Site-specific hazard ratios for urosepsis comparing SGLT2i with DPP4i were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models and pooled using a random effects meta-analysis. We included 208 244 users of SGLT2i and 208 244 users of DPP4i. Among SGLT2i users, 42% initiated canagliflozin, 31% dapagliflozin and 27% empagliflozin. During a mean follow-up of 0.9 years, patients initiating SGLT2i had a lower rate of urosepsis compared with those receiving DPP4i. The pooled adjusted hazard ratio was 0.58 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.42-0.80). The incidence rates of Fournier's gangrene were numerically similar in SGLT2i (0.08 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI: 0.05-0.13) and DPP4i users (0.14; 95% CI: 0.09-0.21). In this large, multi-site study, we did not observe an increased risk for urosepsis associated with SGLT2i compared with DPP4i among patients with type 2 diabetes in a real-world setting.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32383792
doi: 10.1111/dom.14082
doi:

Substances chimiques

Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors 0
Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors 0
Symporters 0
Sodium 9NEZ333N27
Glucose IY9XDZ35W2

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1648-1658

Subventions

Organisme : CIHR
ID : DSE-146021
Pays : Canada

Informations de copyright

© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). FDA drug safety communication: FDA revises labels of SGLT2 inhibitors for diabetes to include warnings about too much acid in the blood and serious urinary tract infections. Available at http://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-drug-safety-communication-fda-revises-labels-sglt2-inhibitors-diabetes-include-warnings-about. Accessed December 3, 2019.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). FDA warns about rare occurrences of a serious infection of the genital area with SGLT2 inhibitors for diabetes. Available at http://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-warns-about-rare-occurrences-serious-infection-genital-area-sglt2-inhibitors-diabetes. Accessed December 3, 2019.
Hsia DS, Grove O, Cefalu WT. An update on SGLT2 inhibitors for the treatment of diabetes mellitus. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2017;24(1):73-79.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Questions and answers on FDA's adverse event reporting system (FAERS). Available at http://www.fda.gov/drugs/surveillance/questions-and-answers-fdas-adverse-event-reporting-system-faers. Accessed January 3, 2020.
Vasilakou D, Karagiannis T, Athanasiadou E, et al. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159(4):262-274.
Vasilakou D, Karagiannis T, Athanasiadou E, Tsapas A. Review: sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors reduce HbA1c and weight but increase infections. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160(2):J10.
Liu XY, Zhang N, Chen R, Zhao JG, Yu P. Efficacy and safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for 1 to 2 years. J Diabetes Complications. 2015;29(8):1295-1303.
Wu JHY, Foote C, Blomster J, et al. Effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors on cardiovascular events, death, and major safety outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4(5):411-419.
Monami M, Nardini C, Mannucci E. Efficacy and safety of sodium glucose co-transport-2 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014;16(5):457-466.
Puckrin R, Saltiel M, Reynier P, Azoulay L, Yu OHY, Filion KB. SGLT-2 inhibitors and the risk of infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Acta Diabetol. 2018;55(5):503-514.
Rådholm K, Wu JH, Wong MG, et al. Effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors on cardiovascular disease, death and safety outcomes in type 2 diabetes - a systematic review. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018;140:118-128.
Detry MA, Lewis RJ. The intention-to-treat principle: how to assess the true effect of choosing a medical treatment. JAMA. 2014;312(1):85-86.
Golder S, Loke YK, Wright K, Norman G. Reporting of adverse events in published and unpublished studies of health care interventions: a systematic review. PLoS Med. 2016;13(9):e1002127.
Elliott L, Fidler C, Ditchfield A, Stissing T. Hypoglycemia event rates: a comparison between real-world data and randomized controlled trial populations in insulin-treated diabetes. Diabetes Ther. 2016;7(1):45-60.
Gadzhanova S, Pratt N, Roughead E. Use of SGLT2 inhibitors for diabetes and risk of infection: analysis using general practice records from the NPS MedicineWise MedicineInsight program. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017;130:180-185.
Dave CV, Schneeweiss S, Kim D, Fralick M, Tong A, Patorno E. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and the risk for severe urinary tract infections: a population-based cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2019;171(4):248-256.
Lega IC, Bronskill SE, Campitelli MA, et al. Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and risk of genital mycotic and urinary tract infection: a population-based study of older women and men with diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019;21(11):2394-2404.
Ueda P, Svanstrom H, Melbye M, et al. Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and risk of serious adverse events: Nationwide register based cohort study. BMJ. 2018;363(363):k4365.
Silverii GA, Dicembrini I, Monami M, Mannucci E. Fournier's gangrene and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020;22(2):272-275.
Yang JY, Wang T, Pate V, Buse JB, Stürmer T. Real-world evidence on sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor use and risk of Fournier's gangrene. BMJ. 2020;8(1).e000985
Dave CV, Schneeweiss S, Patorno E. Association of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor treatment with risk of hospitalization for Fournier gangrene among men. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(11):1587-1590.
Sorensen MD, Krieger JN, Rivara FP, et al. Fournier's gangrene: population based epidemiology and outcomes. J Urol. 2009;181(5):2120-2126.
Lipscombe L, Booth G, Butalia S, et al. Pharmacologic glycemic management of type 2 diabetes in adults. Can J Diabetes. 2018;42:S88-S103.
Das SR, Everett BM, Birtcher KK, et al. 2018 ACC expert consensus decision pathway on novel therapies for cardiovascular risk reduction in patients with type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on expert consensus decision pathways. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(24):3200-3223.
Suissa S, Henry D, Caetano P, et al. CNODES: the Canadian network for observational drug effect studies. Open Med. 2012;6(4):134.
Suissa S, Moodie EE, Dell'Aniello S. Prevalent new-user cohort designs for comparative drug effect studies by time-conditional propensity scores. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017;26(4):459-468.
Herrett E, Gallagher AM, Bhaskaran K, et al. Data resource profile: clinical practice research datalink (CPRD). Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44(3):827-836.
DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7(3):177-188.
Yang L, Zhang L, He H, Zhang M, An Z. Efficacy and safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in east asians with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Ther. 2019;10(5):1921-1934.
Wang K, Zhang Y, Zhao C, Jiang M. SGLT-2 inhibitors and DPP-4 inhibitors as second-line drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Horm Metab Res. 2018;50(10):768-777.
Storgaard H, Gluud LL, Bennett C, et al. Benefits and harms of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(11):e0166125.
Figueiredo IR, Paes Rose SC, Freire NB, Patrocinio MS, Pierdona N, Bittencourt RJ. Use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and urinary tract infections in type 2 diabetes patients: a systematic review. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2019;65(2):246-252.
Cahyadi A, Jimeno CA. Blood pressure lowering effects of sodium glucose transporter 2 inhibitors among adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis. Philipp J Intern Med. 2018;56(3):176-188.
Mishriky BM, Tanenberg RJ, Sewell KA, Cummings DM. Comparing SGLT-2 inhibitors to DPP-4 inhibitors as an add-on therapy to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Metab. 2018;44(2):112-120.
Clar C, Gill JA, Court R, Waugh N. Systematic review of SGLT2 receptor inhibitors in dual or triple therapy in type 2 diabetes. BMJ Open. 2012;2(5):e001007.
Berhan A, Barker A. Sodium glucose co-transport 2 inhibitors in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of randomized double-blind controlled trials. BMC Endocr Disord. 2013;13:58.
Musso G, Gambino R, Cassader M, Pagano G. A novel approach to control hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: sodium glucose co-transport (SGLT) inhibitors. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Ann Med. 2012;44(4):375-393.
Zhang M, Zhang L, Wu B, Song H, An Z, Li S. Dapagliflozin treatment for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Metab Res. 2014;30(3):204-221.
Li D, Wang T, Shen S, Fang Z, Dong Y, Tang H. Urinary tract and genital infections in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017;19(3):348-355.
Petruski-Ivleva N, Schneeweiss S, Eapen S, Rajan A, Jan S. Fournier's gangrene in patients with type 2 diabetes using second-line antidiabetic medications. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020;22(2):267-271.

Auteurs

Anat Fisher (A)

Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Michael Fralick (M)

Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Kristian B Filion (KB)

Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Montreal, Québec, Canada.

Sophie Dell'Aniello (S)

Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Montreal, Québec, Canada.

Antonios Douros (A)

Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Institute of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Éric Tremblay (É)

Institut National d'Excellence en Santé et en Services Sociaux (INESSS), Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.

Baiju R Shah (BR)

Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Paul E Ronksley (PE)

Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Silvia Alessi-Severini (S)

College of Pharmacy, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

Nianping Hu (N)

The Health Quality Council, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.

Shawn C Bugden (SC)

College of Pharmacy, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
School of Pharmacy, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.

Pierre Ernst (P)

Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Lisa M Lix (LM)

Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH