Effect of bicuspid aortic valve phenotype on progression of aortic stenosis.
anatomic progression
aortic stenosis
aortic valve calcification
bicuspid aortic valve
haemodynamic progression
tricuspid aortic valve
Journal
European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging
ISSN: 2047-2412
Titre abrégé: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101573788
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 07 2020
01 07 2020
Historique:
received:
06
01
2020
revised:
12
02
2020
accepted:
25
03
2020
pubmed:
10
5
2020
medline:
29
6
2021
entrez:
10
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To compare the progression of aortic stenosis (AS) in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) or tricuspid aortic valve (TAV). One hundred and forty-one patients with mild-to-moderate AS, recruited prospectively in the PROGRESSA study, were included in this sub-analysis. Baseline clinical, Doppler echocardiography and multidetector computed tomography characteristics were compared between BAV (n = 32) and TAV (n = 109) patients. The 2-year haemodynamic [i.e. peak aortic jet velocity (Vpeak) and mean transvalvular gradient (MG)] and anatomic [i.e. aortic valve calcification density (AVCd) and aortic valve calcification density ratio (AVCd ratio)] progression of AS were compared between the two valve phenotypes. The 2-year progression rate of Vpeak was: 16 (-0 to 40) vs. 17 (3-35) cm/s, P = 0.95; of MG was: 1.8 (-0.7 to 5.8) vs. 2.6 (0.4-4.8) mmHg, P = 0.56; of AVCd was 32 (2-109) vs. 52 (25-85) AU/cm2, P = 0.15; and of AVCd ratio was: 0.08 (0.01-0.23) vs. 0.12 (0.06-0.18), P = 0.16 in patients with BAV vs. TAV. In univariable analyses, BAV was not associated with AS progression (all, P ≥ 0.26). However, with further adjustment for age, AS baseline severity, and several risk factors (i.e. sex, history of hypertension, creatinine level, diabetes, metabolic syndrome), BAV was independently associated with faster haemodynamic (Vpeak: β = 0.31, P = 0.02) and anatomic (AVCd: β = 0.26, P = 0.03 and AVCd ratio: β = 0.26, P = 0.03) progression of AS. In patients with mild-to-moderate AS, patients with BAV have faster haemodynamic and anatomic progression of AS when compared to TAV patients with similar age and risk profile. This study highlights the importance and necessity to closely monitor patients with BAV and to adequately control and treat their risk factors. https://clinicaltrials.gov Unique identifier: NCT01679431.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32386199
pii: 5835256
doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa068
pmc: PMC7306858
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01679431']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
727-734Subventions
Organisme : CIHR
ID : MOP-114997
Pays : Canada
Organisme : CIHR
ID : MOP-2455048
Pays : Canada
Organisme : CIHR
ID : FDN-143225
Pays : Canada
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2020. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
Echocardiography. 2015 Feb;32(2):372-82
pubmed: 25138664
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007 Mar;27(3):642-8
pubmed: 17185617
Nature. 2005 Sep 8;437(7056):270-4
pubmed: 16025100
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Dec 17;62(24):2329-38
pubmed: 24076528
Am J Cardiol. 1970 Jul;26(1):72-83
pubmed: 5427836
Am J Cardiol. 1993 Feb 1;71(4):322-7
pubmed: 8427176
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990 Apr;15(5):1104-8
pubmed: 2312966
J Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2010 Dec;18(4):127-33
pubmed: 21253361
Circulation. 1997 May 6;95(9):2262-70
pubmed: 9142003
Heart. 2002 Oct;88(4):348-51
pubmed: 12231589
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jul 17;60(3):216-23
pubmed: 22789885
Circulation. 2002 Aug 20;106(8):900-4
pubmed: 12186790
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016 Mar 03;2:16006
pubmed: 27188578
Circulation. 1961 Apr;23:485-8
pubmed: 13725804
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Sep 15;66(11):1236-1246
pubmed: 26361154
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Jan;18(1):70-78
pubmed: 26896413
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Jan;8(1):26-33
pubmed: 25499129
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990 Mar 15;15(4):827-32
pubmed: 2407762
Am J Cardiol. 2002 Feb 1;89(3):350-2
pubmed: 11809442
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017 Apr;30(4):372-392
pubmed: 28385280
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Feb 10;7(4):
pubmed: 29440006
JAMA. 2001 May 16;285(19):2486-97
pubmed: 11368702
Int J Cardiol. 2007 Nov 30;122(3):224-31
pubmed: 17291609
Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2015 Jun;14(3):577-88
pubmed: 25262451
Eur Heart J. 2004 Feb;25(3):199-205
pubmed: 14972419
Circulation. 2010 Jan 19;121(2):306-14
pubmed: 20048204
Heart. 2015 Jun;101(12):943-7
pubmed: 25655063
Br Heart J. 1993 Mar;69(3):237-40
pubmed: 8461222
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Jan 1;115(1):86-92
pubmed: 25456876
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Jan 1;19(1):3-8
pubmed: 29029001