Growth and resilience responses of Scots pine to extreme droughts across Europe depend on predrought growth conditions.
Pinus sylvestris
acclimation
latitudinal gradient
predisposition
tree rings
Journal
Global change biology
ISSN: 1365-2486
Titre abrégé: Glob Chang Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9888746
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2020
08 2020
Historique:
received:
18
10
2019
revised:
19
03
2020
accepted:
30
04
2020
pubmed:
11
5
2020
medline:
27
11
2020
entrez:
11
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Global climate change is expected to further raise the frequency and severity of extreme events, such as droughts. The effects of extreme droughts on trees are difficult to disentangle given the inherent complexity of drought events (frequency, severity, duration, and timing during the growing season). Besides, drought effects might be modulated by trees' phenotypic variability, which is, in turn, affected by long-term local selective pressures and management legacies. Here we investigated the magnitude and the temporal changes of tree-level resilience (i.e., resistance, recovery, and resilience) to extreme droughts. Moreover, we assessed the tree-, site-, and drought-related factors and their interactions driving the tree-level resilience to extreme droughts. We used a tree-ring network of the widely distributed Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) along a 2,800 km latitudinal gradient from southern Spain to northern Germany. We found that the resilience to extreme drought decreased in mid-elevation and low productivity sites from 1980-1999 to 2000-2011 likely due to more frequent and severe droughts in the later period. Our study showed that the impact of drought on tree-level resilience was not dependent on its latitudinal location, but rather on the type of sites trees were growing at and on their growth performances (i.e., magnitude and variability of growth) during the predrought period. We found significant interactive effects between drought duration and tree growth prior to drought, suggesting that Scots pine trees with higher magnitude and variability of growth in the long term are more vulnerable to long and severe droughts. Moreover, our results indicate that Scots pine trees that experienced more frequent droughts over the long-term were less resistant to extreme droughts. We, therefore, conclude that the physiological resilience to extreme droughts might be constrained by their growth prior to drought, and that more frequent and longer drought periods may overstrain their potential for acclimation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32388882
doi: 10.1111/gcb.15153
pmc: PMC7383776
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
4521-4537Subventions
Organisme : Marie Skłodowska-Curie
ID : 749051-REFOREST
Pays : International
Organisme : FEDER
ID : IJCI-2015-25845
Pays : International
Organisme : Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities
ID : RTI2018-096884-B-C31
Pays : International
Organisme : Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities
ID : RTI2018-096884-B-C33
Pays : International
Organisme : VULBOS
ID : UPO-1263216
Pays : International
Organisme : PinCaR
ID : UHU-1266324
Pays : International
Organisme : Bavarian Climate Research Network
Pays : International
Organisme : German Waldklimafond
ID : FKZ 28W-C-4-077-01
Pays : International
Organisme : Bavarian State Ministry for Food, Agriculture, and Forestry
ID : ST327
Pays : International
Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Global Change Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Ecol Lett. 2017 Apr;20(4):539-553
pubmed: 28220612
Tree Physiol. 2010 Apr;30(4):490-501
pubmed: 20197285
Oecologia. 2018 May;187(1):343-354
pubmed: 29589144
Nature. 2018 Jun;558(7711):531-539
pubmed: 29950621
New Phytol. 2009 Oct;184(2):353-64
pubmed: 19674333
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 May;24(5):2143-2158
pubmed: 29488293
Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Dec;23(12):5108-5119
pubmed: 28556403
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Apr 02;10:397
pubmed: 31001308
Tree Physiol. 2013 Feb;33(2):221-32
pubmed: 23370549
New Phytol. 2010 Oct;188(2):533-42
pubmed: 20673281
Ecol Lett. 2005 May;8(5):461-7
pubmed: 21352449
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Aug 31;7:1247
pubmed: 27630643
Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Feb;19(2):101-8
pubmed: 16701236
Tree Physiol. 2008 Apr;28(4):529-36
pubmed: 18244940
New Phytol. 2020 Oct;228(1):42-49
pubmed: 30585635
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Feb;26(2):322-324
pubmed: 31442346
Oecologia. 2020 Jan;192(1):241-259
pubmed: 31686228
Nat Commun. 2020 Jan 28;11(1):545
pubmed: 31992718
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Oct 18;102(42):15144-8
pubmed: 16217022
Glob Chang Biol. 2013 Jan;19(1):229-40
pubmed: 23504734
Plant Cell Environ. 2020 May;43(5):1288-1299
pubmed: 31990067
Ecol Lett. 2019 Jan;22(1):119-127
pubmed: 30411456
Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Dec;20(12):3767-79
pubmed: 24838398
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Feb;21(2):738-49
pubmed: 25362899
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jul 17;115(29):7551-7556
pubmed: 29967148
Ecol Lett. 2014 Nov;17(11):1351-64
pubmed: 25205436
Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Oct;23(10):4106-4116
pubmed: 28100041
Science. 2015 Jul 31;349(6247):528-32
pubmed: 26228147
Glob Chang Biol. 2013 Oct;19(10):3184-99
pubmed: 23712589
Tree Physiol. 2005 Jan;25(1):17-30
pubmed: 15519982
Ann Bot. 2002 Feb;89(2):183-9
pubmed: 12099349
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jan 2;110(1):52-7
pubmed: 23248309
Nat Commun. 2018 Dec 10;9(1):5254
pubmed: 30531998
Biom J. 2008 Jun;50(3):346-63
pubmed: 18481363
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Oct 14;111(41):14812-5
pubmed: 25267642
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Jan 11;9:1986
pubmed: 30687375
Nature. 2002 Mar 28;416(6879):389-95
pubmed: 11919621
Ecol Appl. 2013 Dec;23(8):1735-42
pubmed: 24555305
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2013 May;15(3):483-95
pubmed: 23062025
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Apr 24;10:519
pubmed: 31105722
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Mar 22;10:307
pubmed: 30967884
New Phytol. 2007;176(4):749-63
pubmed: 17997761
J Plant Physiol. 2004 Nov;161(11):1189-202
pubmed: 15602811
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Nov;24(11):5380-5390
pubmed: 29963735
Nature. 2005 Sep 22;437(7058):529-33
pubmed: 16177786
New Phytol. 2020 Jun;226(5):1325-1340
pubmed: 31998968
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Jun 14;7:751
pubmed: 27379105
Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Nov;20(11):3530-43
pubmed: 24756980
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Aug;26(8):4521-4537
pubmed: 32388882
Oecologia. 2012 Mar;168(3):877-88
pubmed: 21983639
New Phytol. 2008;178(4):719-39
pubmed: 18422905
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Jan 08;9:1964
pubmed: 30713543
Nat Commun. 2019 Sep 26;10(1):4385
pubmed: 31558795
Glob Chang Biol. 2019 Jan;25(1):201-217
pubmed: 30346104
Nat Ecol Evol. 2017 Sep;1(9):1285-1291
pubmed: 29046541
Tree Physiol. 2010 Jul;30(7):845-52
pubmed: 20504777
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Nov 10;690:1254-1267
pubmed: 31470488
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 May 3;113(18):5024-9
pubmed: 27091965
New Phytol. 2011 May;190(3):750-9
pubmed: 21261625
Oecologia. 2004 Jul;140(2):217-25
pubmed: 15148600
New Phytol. 2017 Apr;214(2):513-520
pubmed: 27891619