Diagnostic Performance of RO948 F 18 Tau Positron Emission Tomography in the Differentiation of Alzheimer Disease From Other Neurodegenerative Disorders.


Journal

JAMA neurology
ISSN: 2168-6157
Titre abrégé: JAMA Neurol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101589536

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 08 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 12 5 2020
medline: 2 4 2021
entrez: 12 5 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The diagnostic performance of second-generation tau positron emission tomographic (PET) tracers is not yet known. To examine the novel tau PET tracer RO948 F 18 ([18F]RO948) performance in discriminating Alzheimer disease (AD) from non-AD neurodegenerative disorders. In this diagnostic study, 613 participants in the Swedish BioFINDER-2 study were consecutively enrolled in a prospective cross-sectional study from September 4, 2017, to August 28, 2019. Participants included 257 cognitively unimpaired controls, 154 patients with mild cognitive impairment, 100 patients with AD dementia, and 102 with non-AD neurodegenerative disorders. Evaluation included a comparison of tau PET tracer [18F]RO948 with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and cerebrospinal fluid and a head-to-head comparison between [18F]RO948 and flortaucipir F 18 ([18F]flortaucipir) in patients with semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA). [18F]RO948 (all patients) and [18F]flortaucipir (3 patients with svPPA) tau PET; MRI (hippocampal volume, composite temporal lobe cortical thickness, whole-brain cortical thickness) and cerebrospinal fluid measures (p-tau181 and amyloid Aβ42 and Aβ40 ratio[Aβ42/Aβ40], and Aβ42/p-tau181 ratio). Standard uptake value ratios (SUVRs) in 4 predefined regions of interest (ROIs) reflecting Braak staging scheme for tau pathology and encompass I-II (entorhinal cortex), III-IV (inferior/middle temporal, fusiform gyrus, parahippocampal cortex, and amygdala), I-IV, and V-VI (widespread neocortical areas), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values, and subtraction images between [18F]RO948 and [18F]flortaucipir. Diagnostic groups among the 613 participants included cognitively unimpaired (mean [SD] age, 65.8 [12.1] years; 117 men [46%]), mild cognitive impairment (age, 70.8 [8.3] years; 82 men [53%]), AD dementia (age, 73.5 [6.7] years; 57 men [57%]), and non-AD disorders (age, 70.5 [8.6] years; 41 men [40%]). Retention of [18F]RO948 was higher in AD dementia compared with all other diagnostic groups. [18F]RO948 could distinguish patients with AD dementia from individuals without cognitive impairment and those with non-AD disorders, and the highest AUC was obtained using the I-IV ROI (AUC = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-0.99 for AD vs no cognitive impairment and AUC = 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-0.99 for AD vs non-AD disorders), which outperformed MRI (highest AUC = 0.91 for AD vs no cognitive impairment using whole-brain thickness, and AUC = 0.80 for AD vs non-AD disorders using temporal lobe thickness) and cerebrospinal fluid measures (highest AUC = 0.94 for AD vs no cognitive impairment using Aβ42/p-tau181, and AUC = 0.93 for AD vs non-AD disorders using Aβ42/Aβ40). Generally, tau PET positivity using [18F]RO948 was observed only in Aβ-positive cases or in MAPT R406W mutation carriers. Retention of [18F]RO948 was not pronounced in patients with svPPA, and head-to-head comparison revealed lower temporal lobe uptake than with [18F]flortaucipir. In this study, elevated [18F]RO948 SUVRs were most often seen among Aβ-positive cases, which suggests that [18F]RO948 has high specificity for AD-type tau and highlights its potential as a diagnostic marker in the differential diagnosis of AD.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32391858
pii: 2765841
doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.0989
pmc: PMC7215644
doi:

Substances chimiques

Fluorine Radioisotopes 0
MAPT protein, human 0
tau Proteins 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

955-965

Références

JAMA Neurol. 2018 May 1;75(5):548-556
pubmed: 29435558
Lancet Neurol. 2013 Feb;12(2):207-16
pubmed: 23332364
Clin Transl Imaging. 2018;6(4):305-316
pubmed: 30148121
N Engl J Med. 2012 Aug 30;367(9):795-804
pubmed: 22784036
Brain. 2016 May;139(Pt 5):1551-67
pubmed: 26962052
Acta Neuropathol. 2011 Jul;122(1):111-3
pubmed: 21644037
N Engl J Med. 2009 May 28;360(22):2302-9
pubmed: 19474427
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2018 Jul 31;10(1):74
pubmed: 30064520
Ann Neurol. 2016 Aug;80(2):247-58
pubmed: 27323247
EMBO Mol Med. 2017 Sep;9(9):1212-1223
pubmed: 28743782
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020 Feb;47(2):342-354
pubmed: 31612245
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013 Sep;84(9):956-62
pubmed: 23543794
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2018 Oct;89(10):1024-1031
pubmed: 28986472
Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2015 May;36(5):297-309
pubmed: 25840462
Alzheimers Dement. 2018 Apr;14(4):535-562
pubmed: 29653606
JAMA Neurol. 2017 Dec 1;74(12):1492-1501
pubmed: 29114726
Alzheimers Dement. 2018 Nov;14(11):1470-1481
pubmed: 29499171
JAMA. 2018 Sep 18;320(11):1151-1162
pubmed: 30326496
Acta Neuropathol. 2015 May;129(5):757-62
pubmed: 25778618
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012 Jan;69(1):98-106
pubmed: 22213792
Data Brief. 2017 Oct 16;15:648-657
pubmed: 29124088
Acta Neuropathol. 1991;82(4):239-59
pubmed: 1759558
J Neurol Sci. 2007 Jun 15;257(1-2):80-7
pubmed: 17324442
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:1121-59
pubmed: 11520930
Lancet Neurol. 2017 Jun;16(6):435-444
pubmed: 28456479
J Nucl Med. 2018 Apr;59(4):675-681
pubmed: 28970331
FEBS Lett. 2018 Jul;592(14):2383-2391
pubmed: 29790176
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019 Sep;46(10):2077-2089
pubmed: 31254035
Radiology. 1983 Sep;148(3):839-43
pubmed: 6878708
Cell. 2013 Jul 3;154(1):103-17
pubmed: 23827677
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2012 Apr;71(4):266-73
pubmed: 22437338
Front Neurol. 2018 Mar 12;9:123
pubmed: 29593630
J Nucl Med. 2018 Dec;59(12):1869-1876
pubmed: 29728519
J Nucl Med. 2013 Jul;54(7):1011-3
pubmed: 23753186
Mol Cell Neurosci. 2019 Jun;97:18-33
pubmed: 30529601
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2018 Oct;89(10):1032-1037
pubmed: 28912300
J Nucl Med. 2018 Dec;59(12):1877-1884
pubmed: 30097505
J Neurochem. 2012 Sep;122(5):883-90
pubmed: 22734715
Brain. 2015 Dec;138(Pt 12):3747-59
pubmed: 26428666
Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 15;9(1):6082
pubmed: 30988363
Brain. 2010 Jan;133(Pt 1):300-6
pubmed: 19805492
Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2016 Jun 13;4(1):58
pubmed: 27296779
Brain Pathol. 2017 Nov;27(6):723-736
pubmed: 28100023
Mol Imaging Biol. 2018 Jun;20(3):356-360
pubmed: 29127552
Ann Neurol. 2015 Nov;78(5):787-800
pubmed: 26344059
Lancet Neurol. 2015 Jan;14(1):114-24
pubmed: 25496902
Ann Neurol. 2018 Nov;84(5):729-740
pubmed: 30255971
BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 Mar 17;12:77
pubmed: 21414208
Curr Alzheimer Res. 2010 Dec;7(8):656-64
pubmed: 20678074
Alzheimers Dement. 2018 Aug;14(8):1005-1014
pubmed: 29605222
Alzheimers Dement. 2016 Nov;12(11):1116-1124
pubmed: 26892233
Radiology. 1982 Apr;143(1):29-36
pubmed: 7063747
Lancet. 2006 Jul 29;368(9533):387-403
pubmed: 16876668
J Nucl Med. 2017 Apr;58(4):623-631
pubmed: 27765859
Ann Neurol. 1997 Oct;42(4):564-72
pubmed: 9382467
JAMA Neurol. 2018 May 1;75(5):536-538
pubmed: 29435570
J Nucl Med. 1998 May;39(5):904-11
pubmed: 9591599
J Neural Transm Suppl. 1998;54:77-95
pubmed: 9850917
Alzheimers Dement. 2017 Mar;13(3):205-216
pubmed: 27697430
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2019 Jan 31;11(1):13
pubmed: 30704514
Mol Psychiatry. 2019 Aug;24(8):1112-1134
pubmed: 30635637
J Nucl Med. 2019 Jan;60(1):93-99
pubmed: 29777006
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014 Aug;85(8):865-70
pubmed: 24421286
JAMA. 2015 May 19;313(19):1939-49
pubmed: 25988463
J Med Chem. 2017 Sep 14;60(17):7350-7370
pubmed: 28654263

Auteurs

Antoine Leuzy (A)

Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.

Ruben Smith (R)

Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Department of Neurology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.

Rik Ossenkoppele (R)

Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Alexander Santillo (A)

Memory Clinic, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.

Edilio Borroni (E)

F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.

Gregory Klein (G)

F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.

Tomas Ohlsson (T)

Department of Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.

Jonas Jögi (J)

Skåne University Hospital, Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Lund, Sweden.

Sebastian Palmqvist (S)

Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Department of Neurology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.

Niklas Mattsson-Carlgren (N)

Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Department of Neurology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Wallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Olof Strandberg (O)

Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.

Erik Stomrud (E)

Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Memory Clinic, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.

Oskar Hansson (O)

Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Memory Clinic, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH