Comparing the effects of ketorolac and Paracetamol on postoperative pain relief after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. A randomized clinical trial.
Acetaminophen
/ therapeutic use
Analgesics
/ therapeutic use
Analgesics, Opioid
Coronary Artery Bypass
/ adverse effects
Coronary Artery Disease
/ surgery
Double-Blind Method
Elective Surgical Procedures
Female
Hemodynamics
Humans
Ketorolac
/ therapeutic use
Male
Middle Aged
Morphine
Myocardial Infarction
Pain Management
Pain Measurement
Pain, Postoperative
/ drug therapy
Time Factors
Visual Analog Scale
Cardiac surgery
Ketorolac
Paracetamol
Postoperative analgesia
Visual analog score
Journal
Journal of cardiothoracic surgery
ISSN: 1749-8090
Titre abrégé: J Cardiothorac Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101265113
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 May 2020
11 May 2020
Historique:
received:
05
02
2020
accepted:
28
04
2020
entrez:
13
5
2020
pubmed:
13
5
2020
medline:
6
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Pain management after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery remains challenging. This study aimed to compare the effects of Ketorolac and Paracetamol on postoperative CABG pain relief. This double-blind randomized clinical trial study was conducted in Ahvaz, Iran, from September 2018-December 2019. Two consecutive groups of 60 patients undergoing elective on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The patients were divided into 0.5 mg/kg of ketorolac mg/dl and 10 mg/kg of Paracetamol after surgery for pain management. Primary outcomes were: visual analog pain scale (VAS) at the time point immediately after extubation (baseline) and at 6, 12, 24 and 48 h and the total dose of morphine consumption. Secondary outcomes included the hemodynamic variables, weaning time, chest tube derange, in-hospital mortality and myocardial infarction. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 22(SPSS, Chicago, IL). The Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare demographic data, VAS scores, vital signs, and side effects. Repeated measurements were tested within groups using Friedman's ANOVA and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Values were expressed as means ± standard deviations. Statistical significance was defined as a p-value < 0.05. Compared with baseline scores, there were significant declines in VAS scores in both groups throughout the time sequence (P< 0.05). The statistical VAS score was slightly higher in the Paracetamol group at most time points, except for the time of 6 h. However, at 24 and 48 h, the VAS score in group Paracetamol was significantly higher than in group Ketorolac. There were no significant differences between groups about hemodynamic variables. The efficacy of ketorolac is comparable to that of Paracetamol in postoperative CABG pain relief. IRCT20150216021098N5. Registered at 2019-09-12.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32393370
doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-01125-y
pii: 10.1186/s13019-020-01125-y
pmc: PMC7216617
doi:
Substances chimiques
Analgesics
0
Analgesics, Opioid
0
Acetaminophen
362O9ITL9D
Morphine
76I7G6D29C
Ketorolac
YZI5105V0L
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
80Subventions
Organisme : Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences
ID : IR.AJUMS.REC.1398.050
Références
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004 Oct;26(4):694-700
pubmed: 15450559
Prog Transplant. 2019 Sep;29(3):283-286
pubmed: 31185805
Br J Anaesth. 2005 Apr;94(4):505-13
pubmed: 15681586
Drugs. 2003;63 Spec No 2:1-4
pubmed: 14758785
N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 17;352(11):1081-91
pubmed: 15713945
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 23;1:CD004753
pubmed: 28114727
Pain Res Treat. 2013;2013:402510
pubmed: 24307945
Pharmacy (Basel). 2016 Jun 28;4(3):
pubmed: 28970395
Br J Anaesth. 2002 Feb;88(2):199-214
pubmed: 11878654
Anesth Analg. 2007 Jul;105(1):205-21
pubmed: 17578977
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011 Oct;25(5):824-9
pubmed: 21232979
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2014 Mar;16(3):455
pubmed: 24482012
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007 Dec;21(6):820-6
pubmed: 18068059
Crit Care Med. 2000 Jul;28(7):2217-23
pubmed: 10921543
Can J Anaesth. 2006 May;53(5):492-9
pubmed: 16636035
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Jun 22;96(13):7563-8
pubmed: 10377455
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Nov 17;66(20):2230-2245
pubmed: 26440214
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2017 Apr;31(2):694-701
pubmed: 27498260
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007 Sep;32(3):527-31
pubmed: 17643995
Acta Pol Pharm. 2014 Jan-Feb;71(1):11-23
pubmed: 24779190
Anesth Analg. 2003 Aug;97(2):534-40, table of contents
pubmed: 12873949
Perspect Clin Res. 2010 Apr;1(2):67-9
pubmed: 21829786
Am Fam Physician. 2005 Mar 1;71(5):913-8
pubmed: 15768621
Anesthesiology. 1994 Jun;80(6):1277-86
pubmed: 8010474
Can J Anaesth. 2000 Dec;47(12):1182-7
pubmed: 11132739
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2007 Nov;50(5):470-9
pubmed: 18030055
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1992 Jul;34(1):79-81
pubmed: 1633071
Anesth Analg. 2012 Feb;114(2):424-33
pubmed: 21965355
J Clin Anesth. 2006 Dec;18(8):605-10
pubmed: 17175431
Am J Ther. 2005 Jan-Feb;12(1):46-55
pubmed: 15662292
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006 Jul;23(7):539-50
pubmed: 16677435
Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Aug;92(2):603-9
pubmed: 21801915
J Res Med Sci. 2013 Mar;18(3):172-7
pubmed: 23930110
Anesthesiology. 2004 Jul;101(1):153-61
pubmed: 15220785