Efficacy and safety of nivolumab for renal cell carcinoma in patients over 75 years old from multiple Japanese institutes.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
/ adverse effects
Asian People
Carcinoma, Renal Cell
/ drug therapy
Female
Humans
Kidney Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Male
Middle Aged
Nivolumab
/ adverse effects
Progression-Free Survival
Retrospective Studies
Survival Rate
Treatment Outcome
75 years or older
Efficacy
Nivolumab
Renal cell carcinoma
Tolerability
Journal
International journal of clinical oncology
ISSN: 1437-7772
Titre abrégé: Int J Clin Oncol
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 9616295
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2020
Aug 2020
Historique:
received:
07
02
2020
accepted:
29
04
2020
pubmed:
13
5
2020
medline:
2
10
2020
entrez:
13
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Despite nivolumab being increasingly used for treating metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), differing findings have been reported about its efficacy and safety in elderly patients. Thus, this study was aimed at evaluating nivolumab's efficacy and safety for treating mRCC in Japanese patients aged ≥ 75 years. From March 2013 to August 2019, 118 mRCC patients (89 men and 29 women) were treated with nivolumab. The objective response rates (ORRs) were compared between patients aged ≥ 75 and < 75 years. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were also compared between the two age-groups. The median follow-up duration after nivolumab initiation was 10 months. At the time of nivolumab initiation, 22 and 96 patients were aged ≥ 75 and < 75 years, respectively. Intergroup differences in patient characteristics except for age were not significant. Furthermore, intergroup differences in ORR (14 vs 23%; P = 0.367), PFS (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.37-1.51; P = 0.414), and median OS (HR 1.29, 95% CI 0.68-2.46; P = 0.433) were not significant. The incidence of nivolumab discontinuation due to AEs was significantly higher in the ≥ 75 years group (27% vs 7%; P = 0.028), although the intergroup difference in the AE incidence rate was not significant (55% vs 43.8%; P = 0.535). Nivolumab's effectiveness was comparable between the two patient groups, except for early AE-related discontinuation in the ≥ 75 year group.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32394047
doi: 10.1007/s10147-020-01693-y
pii: 10.1007/s10147-020-01693-y
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
0
Nivolumab
31YO63LBSN
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM