Amantadine and Modafinil as Neurostimulants During Post-stroke Care: A Systematic Review.


Journal

Neurocritical care
ISSN: 1556-0961
Titre abrégé: Neurocrit Care
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101156086

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 13 5 2020
medline: 17 8 2021
entrez: 13 5 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Amantadine and modafinil are neurostimulants that may improve cognitive and functional recovery post-stroke, but the existing study results vary, and no comprehensive review has been published. This systematic review describes amantadine and modafinil administration practices post-stroke, evaluates timing and impact on clinical effectiveness measures, and identifies the incidence of potential adverse drug effects. A librarian-assisted search of the MEDLINE (PubMed) and EMBASE databases identified all English-language publications with "amantadine" or "modafinil" in the title or abstract from inception through February 1, 2020. Publications meeting predefined Patient, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome (PICO) criteria were included: Patients (≥ 18 years of age post-stroke); Intervention (amantadine or modafinil administration); Comparison (pretreatment baseline or control group); Outcomes (cognitive or functional outcome). Amantadine and modafinil administration practices, cognitive and functional outcomes, and incidence of potential adverse drug effects were collected following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidance. Quantitative analyses were not performed due to heterogeneity in the clinical effectiveness measures; descriptive data are presented as number (percent) or median (interquartile range). Of 12,620 publications initially identified, 10 amantadine publications (n = 121 patients) and 12 modafinil publications (n = 120 patients) were included. Amantadine was initiated 39 (16, 385) days post-stroke, with most common initial doses of 100 mg once or twice daily (range 100-200 mg/day), and final daily dose of 200 (188, 200) mg/day. Modafinil was initiated 170 (17, 496) days post-stroke, with initial and final daily doses of 100 (100, 350) mg/day and 200 (100, 350) mg/day, respectively. The most common indication was consciousness disorders for amantadine (n = 3/10 publications; 30%) and fatigue for modafinil (n = 5/12; 42%). Forty unique clinical effectiveness measures (1.8 per study) with 141 domains (6.4 per study) were described across all studies. A positive response in at least one clinical effectiveness measure was reported in 70% of amantadine publications and 83% of modafinil publications. Only one publication each for amantadine (10%; n = 5 patients) and modafinil (8%; n = 21 patients) studied acutely hospitalized or ICU patients; both were randomized studies showing improvements in neurocognitive function for amantadine and fatigue for modafinil. Potential adverse drug effects were reported in approximately 50% of publications, most commonly visual hallucinations with amantadine (2% of patients) and dizziness (5% of patients) and dry eyes or mouth (5% of patients). Amantadine and modafinil may improve cognitive and functional recovery post-stroke, but higher-quality data are needed to confirm this conclusion, especially in the acute care setting.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32394130
doi: 10.1007/s12028-020-00977-5
pii: 10.1007/s12028-020-00977-5
doi:

Substances chimiques

Central Nervous System Stimulants 0
Dopamine Agents 0
Amantadine BF4C9Z1J53
Modafinil R3UK8X3U3D

Types de publication

Journal Article Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

283-297

Références

GBD 2016 Stroke Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18:439–58.
Vickrey BG, Brott TG, Koroshetz WJ; Stroke Research Priorities Meeting Steering Committee and the National Advisory Neurological Disorders and Stroke Council; National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. Research priority setting: a summary of the 2012 NINDS Stroke Planning Meeting Report. Stroke 2013;44:2338–42.
Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, Bates B, Cherney LR, Cramer SC, et al. Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2016;47:e98–169.
pubmed: 27145936
Martinsson L, Hårdemark H, Eksborg S. Amphetamines for improving recovery after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;(1):CD002090.
Goldstein LB, Lennihan L, Rabadi MJ, Good DC, Reding MJ, Dromerick AW, et al. Effect of dextroamphetamine on poststroke motor recovery: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75:1494–501.
pubmed: 30167675 pmcid: 6583201
Hubsher G, Haider M, Okun MS. Amantadine: the journey from fighting flu to treating Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2012;78(14):1096–9.
pubmed: 22474298
Gualtieri T, Chandler M, Coons TB, Brown LT. Amantadine: a new clinical profile for traumatic brain injury. Clin Neuropharmacol. 1989;12(4):258–70.
pubmed: 2680078
Stoof JC, Booij J, Drukarch B. Amantadine as N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor antagonist: new possibilities for therapeutic applications? Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 1992;94(Suppl):S4–6.
pubmed: 1320514
Jibiki I, Morikawa K, Yamaguchi N. Beneficial effect of amantadine on symptoms of dementia in patients with cerebral infarctions. Acta Ther. 1993;19:383–7.
Ballon JS, Feifel D. A systematic review of modafinil: potential clinical uses and mechanisms of action. J Clin Psychiatry. 2006;67:554–66.
pubmed: 16669720
Autret A, Lucas B, Mondon K, Hommet C, Corcia P, Saudeau D, et al. Sleep and brain lesions: a critical review of the literature and additional new cases. Neurophysiol Clin. 2001;31:356–75.
pubmed: 11810986
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6: e1000097.
Cooper C, Booth A, Varley-Campbell J, Britten N, Garside R. Defining the process to literature searching in systematic reviews: a literature review of guidance and supporting studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18:85.
pubmed: 30107788 pmcid: 6092796
Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The cochrane collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.
pubmed: 22008217 pmcid: 3196245
Balshem H, Helfand M, Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:401–6.
pubmed: 21208779
National Cancer Institute. Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) v5.0. https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocoldevelopment/electronic_applications/docs/CTCAE_v5_Quick_Reference_5x7.pdf . Accessed 10 Feb 2020.
Nakagawa T, Wada H, Sekizawa K, Arai H, Sasaki H. Amantadine and pneumonia. Lancet. 1999;353:1157.
pubmed: 10209989
Engelter ST, Urscheler N, Baronti F, Vuadens P, Koch J, Frank M, et al. Frequency and determinants of using pharmacological enhancement in the clinical practice of in-hospital stroke rehabilitation. Eur Neurol. 2012;68:28–33.
pubmed: 22677938
Nickels JL, Schneider WN, Dombovy ML, Wong TM. Clinical use of amantadine in brain injury rehabilitation. Brain Inj. 1994;8:709–18.
pubmed: 7849690
Raffaele R, Nicoletti G, Vecchio I, Ruggieri M, Malaguarnera M, Rampello L, et al. Use of amantadine in the treatment of the neurobehavioral sequelae after brain injury in elderly patients. Arch Gerontol Geriatr Suppl. 2002;8:309–12.
pubmed: 14764408
Zorowitz RD, Smout RJ, Gassaway JA, Horn SD. Neurostimulant medication usage during stroke rehabilitation: the Post-Stroke Rehabilitation Outcomes Project (PSROP). Top Stroke Rehabil. 2005;12:28–36.
pubmed: 16698735
Barrett AM, Eslinger PJ. Amantadine for adynamic speech: possible benefit for aphasia? Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;86:605–12.
pubmed: 17667190 pmcid: 1939971
Pokryszko-Dragan A, Słotwiński K, Budrewicz SP, Podemski R, Zagrajek M, Bilińska M. Attention level and event-related evoked potentials in patients with cerebrovascular disease treated with amantadine sulfate - a pilot study. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2008;17:553–8.
Al-Adawi S, Hoaglin H, Vesali F, Dorvlo AS, Burke DT. Effect of amantadine on the sleep-wake cycle of an inpatient with brain injury. Brain Inj. 2009;23:559–65.
pubmed: 19484629
Avecillas-Chasín JM, Barcia JA. Effect of amantadine in minimally conscious state of non-traumatic etiology. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2014;156:1375–7.
Lehnerer SM, Scheibe F, Buchert R, Kliesch S, Meisel A. Awakening with amantadine from a persistent vegetative state after subarachnoid haemorrhage. BMJ Case Rep 2017; pii: bcr-2017-220305.
Akçıl EF, Dilmen ÖK, Vehid H, Tunalı Y. Can amantadine ameliorate neurocognitive functions after subarachnoid haemorrhage? A preliminary study. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2018;46(2):100–7.
pubmed: 29744244 pmcid: 5937455
Cochran JW. Effect of modafinil on fatigue associated with neurological illnesses. J. Chronic Fatigue Syndr. 2001;8:65–70.
Smith BW. Modafinil for treatment of cognitive side effects of antiepileptic drugs in a patient with seizures and stroke. Epilepsy Behav. 2003;4:352–3.
pubmed: 12791341
Sugden SG, Bourgeois JA. Modafinil monotherapy in poststroke depression. Psychosomatics. 2004;45:80–1.
pubmed: 14709763
Brioschi A, Gramigna S, Werth E, Staub F, Ruffieux C, Bassetti C, et al. Effect of modafinil on subjective fatigue in multiple sclerosis and stroke patients. Eur Neurol. 2009;62:243–9.
pubmed: 19672078
Engelter ST, Frank M, Lyrer PA, Conzelmann M. Safety of pharmacological augmentation of stroke rehabilitation. Eur Neurol. 2010;64:325–30.
pubmed: 21071948
Zavalko I, Bassetti CL, Cianfoni A, Carugati J, Fulda S, Manconi M. Hypersomnia due to bilateral thalamic lesions: unexpected response to modafinil. Eur J Neurol. 2012;19:e125–6.
pubmed: 22900741
Poulsen MB, Damgaard B, Zerahn B, Overgaard K, Rasmussen RS. Modafinil may alleviate poststroke fatigue: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial. Stroke. 2015;46:3470–7.
pubmed: 26534969
Jang SH, Seo JP. Restoration of the ascending reticular activating system compressed by hematoma in a stroke patient. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96:e6103.
Bivard A, Lillicrap T, Krishnamurthy V, Holliday E, Attia J, Pagram H, et al. MIDAS (modafinil in debilitating fatigue after stroke): a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial. Stroke. 2017;48:1293–8.
pubmed: 28404841 pmcid: 5404401
Lillicrap TP, Levi CR, Holliday E, Parsons MW, Bivard A. Short- and long-term efficacy of modafinil at improving quality of life in stroke survivors: a post hoc sub study of the modafinil in debilitating fatigue after stroke trial. Front Neurol. 2018;9:269.
pubmed: 29922211 pmcid: 5996886
Chandler MC, Barnhill JL, Gualtieri CT. Amantadine for the agitated head-injury patient. Brain Inj. 1988;2:309–11.
pubmed: 3203176
Schneider WN, Drew-Cates J, Wong TM, Dombovy ML. Cognitive and behavioural efficacy of amantadine in acute traumatic brain injury: an initial double-blind placebo-controlled study. Brain Inj. 1999;13:863–72.
pubmed: 10579658
Meythaler JM, Brunner RC, Johnson A, Novack TA. Amantadine to improve neurorecovery in traumatic brain injury-associated diffuse axonal injury: a pilot double-blind randomized trial. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2002;17:300–13.
pubmed: 12105999
Giacino JT, Whyte J, Bagiella E, Kalmar K, Childs N, Khademi A, et al. Placebo-controlled trial of amantadine for severe traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:819–26.
pubmed: 22375973
Schnakers C, Hustinx R, Vandewalle G, Majerus S, Moonen G, Boly M, et al. Measuring the effect of amantadine in chronic anoxic minimally conscious state. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008;79:225–7.
pubmed: 18202217
Gosseries O, Charland-Verville V, Thonnard M, Bodart O, Laureys S, Demertzi A. Amantadine, apomorphine and zolpidem in the treatment of disorders of consciousness. Curr Pharm Des. 2014;20:4167–84.
pubmed: 24025057
Hinkle JL, Becker KJ, Kim JS, Choi-Kwon S, Saban KL, McNair N, et al. Poststroke fatigue: emerging evidence and approaches to management: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Stroke. 2017;48:e159–70.
pubmed: 28546322
Annen J, Filippini MM, Bonin E, Cassol H, Aubinet C, Carrière M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the CRS-R index in patients with disorders of consciousness. Brain Inj. 2019;33:1409–12.
pubmed: 31319707
Almojuela A, Hasen M, Zeiler FA. The Full Outline of UnResponsiveness (FOUR) Score and its use in outcome prediction: a scoping systematic review of the adult literature. Neurocrit Care 2018 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-018-0630-9 . [Epub ahead of print].
Gouvier WD, Blanton PD, LaPorte KK, Nepomuceno C. Reliability and validity of the Disability Rating Scale and the Levels of Cognitive Functioning Scale in monitoring recovery from severe head injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987;68:94–7.
pubmed: 3813863
Turner AL, Perry MS. Outside the box: medications worth considering when traditional antiepileptic drugs have failed. Seizure. 2017;50:173–85.
pubmed: 28704741
Steinberg A, Rittenberger JC, Baldwin M, Faro J, Urban A, Zaher N, et al. Neurostimulant use is associated with improved survival in comatose patients after cardiac arrest regardless of electroencephalographic substrate. Resuscitation. 2018;123:38–42.
pubmed: 29221942
Pacheco RL, Latorraca COC, da Silva LDGM, Ferreira DBGM, Fernandes CAA, Hosni ND, et al. Modafinil for poststroke patients: a systematic review. Int J Clin Pract. 2019;73:e13295.
pubmed: 30444561
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Methods guide for effectiveness and comparative effectiveness reviews. https://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/cer-methods-guide . Accessed 2 Oct 2020.
Geffen S, Shum K, Tan HM. Novel use of modafinal to treat severe physical and cognitive impairment post-stroke. Intern Med J. 2013;43:338.
pubmed: 23441663
Benefits of Amantadine in Patients with Coma State. Accessed on June 1, 2019 at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03443037?cond=amantadine&rank=1 .
Modafinil In Debilitating Fatigue After Stroke 2 (MIDAS 2). Accessed on June 1, 2019 at https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=374808 .

Auteurs

David J Gagnon (DJ)

Department of Pharmacy, Maine Medical Center, Maine Medical Center Research Institute, Tufts University School of Medicine, 22 Bramhall Street, Portland, ME, 04102, USA. dgagnon@mmc.org.

Angela M Leclerc (AM)

Department of Critical Care Services, Neuroscience Institute, Maine Medical Center, 22 Bramhall Street, Portland, ME, 04102, USA.

Richard R Riker (RR)

Department of Critical Care Services, Neuroscience Institute, Maine Medical Center, 22 Bramhall Street, Portland, ME, 04102, USA.

Caitlin S Brown (CS)

Department of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.

Teresa May (T)

Department of Critical Care Services, Neuroscience Institute, Maine Medical Center, 22 Bramhall Street, Portland, ME, 04102, USA.

Kristina Nocella (K)

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Maine Medical Center, 22 Bramhall Street, Portland, ME, 04102, USA.

Jennifer Cote (J)

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Maine Medical Center, 22 Bramhall Street, Portland, ME, 04102, USA.

Ashley Eldridge (A)

Department of Critical Care Services, Neuroscience Institute, Maine Medical Center, 22 Bramhall Street, Portland, ME, 04102, USA.

David B Seder (DB)

Department of Critical Care Services, Neuroscience Institute, Maine Medical Center, 22 Bramhall Street, Portland, ME, 04102, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH