Proficiency based progression simulation training significantly reduces utility strikes; A prospective, randomized and blinded study.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
19
10
2019
accepted:
04
04
2020
entrez:
13
5
2020
pubmed:
13
5
2020
medline:
25
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We evaluated a simulation-based training curriculum with quantitatively defined performance benchmarks for utility workers location and excavation of utility services. Damaging buried utilities is associated with considerable safety risks to workers and substantial cost to employers. In a prospective, randomized and blinded study we assessed the impact of Proficiency Based Progression (PBP) simulation training on the location and excavation of utility services work. PBP simulation training reduced performance errors (33%, p = 0.006) in comparison a standard trained group. When implemented across all workers in the same division there was a 35-61% reduction in utility strikes (p = 0.028) and an estimated cost saving of £116,000 -£2,175,000 in the 12 months (47,000 work hours) studied. The magnitude of the training benefit of PBP simulation training in the utilities sector appears to be the same as it is in surgery, cardiology and procedure-based medicine. Quality-assured utility worker simulation training significantly reduces utility damage and associated costs.
Sections du résumé
OBJECTIVES
We evaluated a simulation-based training curriculum with quantitatively defined performance benchmarks for utility workers location and excavation of utility services.
BACKGROUND
Damaging buried utilities is associated with considerable safety risks to workers and substantial cost to employers.
METHODS
In a prospective, randomized and blinded study we assessed the impact of Proficiency Based Progression (PBP) simulation training on the location and excavation of utility services work.
RESULTS
PBP simulation training reduced performance errors (33%, p = 0.006) in comparison a standard trained group. When implemented across all workers in the same division there was a 35-61% reduction in utility strikes (p = 0.028) and an estimated cost saving of £116,000 -£2,175,000 in the 12 months (47,000 work hours) studied.
CONCLUSIONS
The magnitude of the training benefit of PBP simulation training in the utilities sector appears to be the same as it is in surgery, cardiology and procedure-based medicine.
APPLICATION
Quality-assured utility worker simulation training significantly reduces utility damage and associated costs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32396535
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231979
pii: PONE-D-19-29219
pmc: PMC7217447
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0231979Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have read the journal’s policy and have the following conflicts: MH, DC, CH, and KM were employees of Reach Active at the time of the study. PK was an employee of Flux Learning Ltd. This does not alter our adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. There are no patents, products in developments, or marketed products to declare.
Références
Arthroscopy. 2015 Oct;31(10):1854-71
pubmed: 26341047
ANZ J Surg. 2018 May;88(5):E412-E417
pubmed: 29569819
J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Oct;207(4):560-8
pubmed: 18926460
Arthroscopy. 2015 Oct;31(10):1872-9
pubmed: 26298642
Ann Surg. 2012 Aug;256(2):387-93
pubmed: 22580935
Arthroscopy. 2015 Sep;31(9):1655-70
pubmed: 26238730
N Engl J Med. 2014 Aug 28;371(9):794-5
pubmed: 25075620
Ann Surg. 2013 Jun;257(6):1025-31
pubmed: 23426342
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 15;8(10):e020099
pubmed: 30327396
Arthroscopy. 2015 Sep;31(9):1639-54
pubmed: 26129726
Ann Surg. 2005 Feb;241(2):364-72
pubmed: 15650649
Arthroscopy. 2018 Jul;34(7):2191-2198
pubmed: 29730215
Ulster Med J. 2012 Sep;81(3):107-13
pubmed: 23620606
Am J Surg. 2007 Jun;193(6):797-804
pubmed: 17512301
Ann Surg. 2002 Oct;236(4):458-63; discussion 463-4
pubmed: 12368674