Assessing capacity of health facilities to provide routine maternal and newborn care in low-income settings: what proportions are ready to provide good-quality care, and what proportions of women receive it?


Journal

BMC pregnancy and childbirth
ISSN: 1471-2393
Titre abrégé: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967799

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 May 2020
Historique:
received: 26 09 2019
accepted: 07 04 2020
entrez: 14 5 2020
pubmed: 14 5 2020
medline: 15 12 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Good quality maternal and newborn care at primary health facilities is essential, but in settings with high maternal and newborn mortality the evidence for the protective effect of facility delivery is inconsistent. We surveyed samples of health facilities in three settings with high maternal mortality to assess their readiness to provide routine maternal and newborn care, and proportions of women using facilities that were ready to offer good quality care. Surveys were conducted in 2012 and 2015 to assess changes over time. Surveys were conducted in Ethiopia, the Indian state of Uttar Pradesh and Gombe State in North-Eastern Nigeria. At each facility the staffing, infrastructure and commodities were quantified. These formed components of four "signal functions" that described aspects of routine maternal and newborn care. A facility was considered ready to perform a signal function if all the required components were present. Readiness to perform all four signal functions classed a facility as ready to provide good quality routine care. From facility registers we counted deliveries and calculated the proportions of women delivering in facilities ready to offer good quality routine care. In Ethiopia the proportion of deliveries in facilities classed as ready to offer good quality routine care rose from 40% (95% confidence interval (CI) 26-57) in 2012 to 43% (95% CI 31-56) in 2015. In Uttar Pradesh these estimates were 4% (95% CI 1-24) in 2012 and 39% (95% CI 25-55) in 2015, while in Nigeria they were 25% (95% CI 6-66) in 2012 and zero in 2015. Improved facility readiness in Ethiopia and Uttar Pradesh arose from increased supplies of commodities, while in Nigeria facility readiness fell due to depleted commodity supplies and fewer Skilled Birth Attendants. This study quantified the readiness of health facilities to offer good quality routine maternal and newborn care, and may help explain inconsistent outcomes of facility care in some settings. Signal function methodology can provide a rapid and inexpensive measure of such facility readiness. Incorporating data on facility deliveries and repeating the analyses highlighted adjustments that could have greatest impact upon routine maternal and newborn care.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Good quality maternal and newborn care at primary health facilities is essential, but in settings with high maternal and newborn mortality the evidence for the protective effect of facility delivery is inconsistent. We surveyed samples of health facilities in three settings with high maternal mortality to assess their readiness to provide routine maternal and newborn care, and proportions of women using facilities that were ready to offer good quality care. Surveys were conducted in 2012 and 2015 to assess changes over time.
METHODS METHODS
Surveys were conducted in Ethiopia, the Indian state of Uttar Pradesh and Gombe State in North-Eastern Nigeria. At each facility the staffing, infrastructure and commodities were quantified. These formed components of four "signal functions" that described aspects of routine maternal and newborn care. A facility was considered ready to perform a signal function if all the required components were present. Readiness to perform all four signal functions classed a facility as ready to provide good quality routine care. From facility registers we counted deliveries and calculated the proportions of women delivering in facilities ready to offer good quality routine care.
RESULTS RESULTS
In Ethiopia the proportion of deliveries in facilities classed as ready to offer good quality routine care rose from 40% (95% confidence interval (CI) 26-57) in 2012 to 43% (95% CI 31-56) in 2015. In Uttar Pradesh these estimates were 4% (95% CI 1-24) in 2012 and 39% (95% CI 25-55) in 2015, while in Nigeria they were 25% (95% CI 6-66) in 2012 and zero in 2015. Improved facility readiness in Ethiopia and Uttar Pradesh arose from increased supplies of commodities, while in Nigeria facility readiness fell due to depleted commodity supplies and fewer Skilled Birth Attendants.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
This study quantified the readiness of health facilities to offer good quality routine maternal and newborn care, and may help explain inconsistent outcomes of facility care in some settings. Signal function methodology can provide a rapid and inexpensive measure of such facility readiness. Incorporating data on facility deliveries and repeating the analyses highlighted adjustments that could have greatest impact upon routine maternal and newborn care.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32397964
doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02926-8
pii: 10.1186/s12884-020-02926-8
pmc: PMC7218484
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

289

Subventions

Organisme : Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
ID : OPP1017031
Pays : United States

Références

BJOG. 2009 Oct;116 Suppl 1:18-21
pubmed: 19740165
J Glob Health. 2016 Dec;6(2):020501
pubmed: 27606060
Lancet. 2006 Oct 7;368(9543):1284-99
pubmed: 17027735
Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Apr;4(4):e276-86
pubmed: 27013314
J Glob Health. 2016 Jun;6(1):010506
pubmed: 27418960
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009 Aug 11;9:34
pubmed: 19671156
Hum Resour Health. 2016 Jul 27;14(1):46
pubmed: 27465121
PLoS Med. 2012;9(11):e1001340
pubmed: 23152724
J Glob Health. 2017 Jun;7(1):010801
pubmed: 28607675
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Nov 22;13:216
pubmed: 24261785
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Nov 04;15:287
pubmed: 26538084
Lancet. 2013 May 18;381(9879):1747-55
pubmed: 23683641
Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Nov;4(11):e845-e855
pubmed: 27670090
BJOG. 2015 Jan;122(2):183-9
pubmed: 25546039
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Feb 14;13:61
pubmed: 23410228
Lancet. 2010 Jun 5;375(9730):2009-23
pubmed: 20569841
Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2016 May;17(2):76-84
pubmed: 27365339
Lancet. 2015 Oct 17;386(10003):1511-4
pubmed: 26530604
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Nov;6(11):e1196-e1252
pubmed: 30196093
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Dec;44(6):1879-88
pubmed: 26130739
Lancet. 2016 Jan 30;387(10017):462-74
pubmed: 26584737
Trop Med Int Health. 2009 Dec;14(12):1523-33
pubmed: 19793070

Auteurs

Keith Tomlin (K)

Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK. keith.tomlin@lshtm.ac.uk.

Della Berhanu (D)

Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.

Meenakshi Gautham (M)

Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK.

Nasir Umar (N)

Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.

Joanna Schellenberg (J)

Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.

Deepthi Wickremasinghe (D)

Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.

Tanya Marchant (T)

Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH