Mutational spectrum of acquired resistance to reversible versus irreversible EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biomarkers, Tumor
/ genetics
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
/ drug therapy
Drug Resistance, Neoplasm
ErbB Receptors
/ genetics
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Lung Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Male
Middle Aged
Molecular Targeted Therapy
Mutation
Prognosis
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
/ pharmacology
Retrospective Studies
Survival Rate
Acquired resistance
Afatinib
EGFR
Erlotinib
Gefitinib
NSCLC
TKI
Journal
BMC cancer
ISSN: 1471-2407
Titre abrégé: BMC Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967800
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 May 2020
12 May 2020
Historique:
received:
07
10
2019
accepted:
30
04
2020
entrez:
14
5
2020
pubmed:
14
5
2020
medline:
3
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Over the past years, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) revolutionized treatment response. 1st-generation (reversible) EGFR TKI and later the 2nd -generation irreversible EGFR TKI Afatinib were aimed to improve treatment response. Nevertheless, diverse resistance mechanisms develop within the first year of therapy. Here, we evaluate the prevalence of acquired resistance mechanisms towards reversible and irreversible EGFR TKI. Rebiopsies of patients after progression to EGFR TKI therapy (> 6 months) were targeted to histological and molecular analysis. Multiplexed targeted sequencing (NGS) was conducted to identify acquired resistance mutations (e.g. EGFR p.T790M). Further, Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) was applied to investigate the status of bypass mechanisms like, MET or HER2 amplification. One hundred twenty-three rebiopsy samples of patients that underwent first-line EGFR TKI therapy (PFS ≥6 months) were histologically and molecularly profiled upon clinical progression. The EGFR p.T790M mutation is the major mechanism of acquired resistance in patients treated with reversible as well as irreversible EGFR TKI. Nevertheless a statistically significant difference for the acquisition of T790M mutation has been identified: 45% of afatinib- vs 65% of reversible EGFR TKI treated patients developed a T790M mutation (p-value 0.02). Progression free survival (PFS) was comparable in patients treated with irreversible EGFR irrespective of the sensitising primary mutation or the acquisition of p.T790M. The EGFR p.T790M mutation is the most prominent mechanism of resistance to reversible and irreversible EGFR TKI therapy. Nevertheless there is a statistically significant difference of p.T790M acquisition between the two types of TKI, which might be of importance for clinical therapy decision.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Over the past years, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) revolutionized treatment response. 1st-generation (reversible) EGFR TKI and later the 2nd -generation irreversible EGFR TKI Afatinib were aimed to improve treatment response. Nevertheless, diverse resistance mechanisms develop within the first year of therapy. Here, we evaluate the prevalence of acquired resistance mechanisms towards reversible and irreversible EGFR TKI.
METHODS
METHODS
Rebiopsies of patients after progression to EGFR TKI therapy (> 6 months) were targeted to histological and molecular analysis. Multiplexed targeted sequencing (NGS) was conducted to identify acquired resistance mutations (e.g. EGFR p.T790M). Further, Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) was applied to investigate the status of bypass mechanisms like, MET or HER2 amplification.
RESULTS
RESULTS
One hundred twenty-three rebiopsy samples of patients that underwent first-line EGFR TKI therapy (PFS ≥6 months) were histologically and molecularly profiled upon clinical progression. The EGFR p.T790M mutation is the major mechanism of acquired resistance in patients treated with reversible as well as irreversible EGFR TKI. Nevertheless a statistically significant difference for the acquisition of T790M mutation has been identified: 45% of afatinib- vs 65% of reversible EGFR TKI treated patients developed a T790M mutation (p-value 0.02). Progression free survival (PFS) was comparable in patients treated with irreversible EGFR irrespective of the sensitising primary mutation or the acquisition of p.T790M.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The EGFR p.T790M mutation is the most prominent mechanism of resistance to reversible and irreversible EGFR TKI therapy. Nevertheless there is a statistically significant difference of p.T790M acquisition between the two types of TKI, which might be of importance for clinical therapy decision.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32397977
doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06920-3
pii: 10.1186/s12885-020-06920-3
pmc: PMC7216404
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
0
EGFR protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
ErbB Receptors
EC 2.7.10.1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
408Subventions
Organisme : Boehringer Ingelheim
ID : Not applicable
Références
Cancer Res. 2018 Dec 15;78(24):6728-6735
pubmed: 30333118
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jul 31;109(31):E2127-33
pubmed: 22773810
Pneumologie. 2018 Nov;72(11):774-781
pubmed: 30408830
Virchows Arch. 2018 May;472(5):807-814
pubmed: 29388014
ESMO Open. 2016 May 11;1(3):e000060
pubmed: 27843613
Future Oncol. 2019 Feb;15(6):637-652
pubmed: 30404555
Oncologist. 2015 Oct;20(10):1167-74
pubmed: 26354527
Curr Opin Oncol. 2019 Jan;31(1):1-7
pubmed: 30451714
Nat Med. 2016 Mar;22(3):262-9
pubmed: 26828195
Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Oct 1;17(19):6322-8
pubmed: 21831955
PLoS Med. 2005 Mar;2(3):e73
pubmed: 15737014
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Feb 1;25(3):1063-1069
pubmed: 30045933
N Engl J Med. 2009 Sep 3;361(10):947-57
pubmed: 19692680
Ann Oncol. 2018 Jan 1;29(suppl_1):i10-i19
pubmed: 29462254
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2018 Oct;18(10):1021-1030
pubmed: 30079781
Sci Rep. 2016 Nov 04;6:36458
pubmed: 27811988
J Pathol Clin Res. 2017 Mar 07;3(2):100-104
pubmed: 28451458
Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Sep 1;17(17):5530-7
pubmed: 21775534
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 1;13(11):e0201682
pubmed: 30383772
Curr Opin Oncol. 2015 Mar;27(2):94-101
pubmed: 25611025
Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Apr 15;19(8):2240-7
pubmed: 23470965
Oncogene. 2009 Aug;28 Suppl 1:S24-31
pubmed: 19680293
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jun 24;362(25):2380-8
pubmed: 20573926
J Thorac Oncol. 2016 Nov;11(11):2022-2026
pubmed: 27553514
N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 30;372(18):1689-99
pubmed: 25923549
Cells. 2018 Nov 15;7(11):
pubmed: 30445769
Ann Oncol. 2018 Jan 1;29(suppl_1):i20-i27
pubmed: 29462255
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2018 Jan-Dec;12:1753466618808659
pubmed: 30355049
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Sep 2;105(35):13081-6
pubmed: 18723673
J Thorac Oncol. 2015 Jul;10(7):1049-57
pubmed: 26102443
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2015 Feb;4(1):67-81
pubmed: 25806347
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Feb;11(2):121-8
pubmed: 20022809
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Jul;10(7):E526-E531
pubmed: 30174925
Mol Cancer Res. 2017 Jul;15(7):915-928
pubmed: 28289161
Oncotarget. 2017 Jul 12;8(40):68123-68130
pubmed: 28978102
Sci Transl Med. 2011 Mar 23;3(75):75ra26
pubmed: 21430269
Oncotarget. 2016 Mar 15;7(11):12404-13
pubmed: 26862733
Onkologie. 2013;36(9):510-8
pubmed: 24051929
J Thorac Oncol. 2017 Apr;12(4):663-672
pubmed: 28007624
Cancer Discov. 2012 Oct;2(10):922-33
pubmed: 22956644
Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Feb 15;21(4):907-15
pubmed: 25492085
CA Cancer J Clin. 2014 Jan-Feb;64(1):9-29
pubmed: 24399786
Future Oncol. 2018 Nov;14(27):2861-2874
pubmed: 30336693