Staff members' prioritisation of care in residential aged care facilities: a Q methodology study.


Journal

BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 May 2020
Historique:
received: 30 10 2019
accepted: 19 03 2020
entrez: 16 5 2020
pubmed: 16 5 2020
medline: 1 12 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

When healthcare professionals' workloads are greater than available resources, care activities can be missed, omitted or delayed, potentially leading to adverse patient outcomes. Prioritisation, a precursor to missed care, involves decision-making about the order of care task completion based on perceived importance or urgency. Research on prioritisation and missed care has predominantly focused on acute care settings, which differ from residential aged care facilities in terms of funding, structure, staffing levels, skill mix, and approaches to care. The objective of this study was to investigate how care staff prioritise the care provided to residents living in residential aged care. Thirty-one staff members from five Australian residential aged care facilities engaged in a Q sorting activity by ranking 34 cards representing different care activities on a pre-defined grid from 'Least important' (- 4) to 'Most important' (+ 4). Concurrently, they participated in a think-aloud task, verbalising their decision-making processes. Following sorting, participants completed post-sorting interviews, a demographics questionnaire and semi-structured interviews. Q sort data were analysed using centroid factor analysis and varimax rotation in PQMethod. Factor arrays and data from the think-aloud task, field notes and interviews facilitated interpretation of the resulting factors. A four-factor solution, representing 22 participants and 62% of study variance, satisfied the selection criteria. The four distinct viewpoints represented by the solution were: 1. Prioritisation of clinical care, 2. Prioritisation of activities of daily living, 3. Humanistic approach to the prioritisation of care, and 4. Holistic approach to the prioritisation of care. Participants' prioritisation decisions were largely influenced by their occupations and perceived role responsibilities. Across the four viewpoints, residents having choices about their care ranked as a lower priority. This study has implications for missed care, as it demonstrates how care tasks deemed outside the scope of staff members' defined roles are often considered a lower priority. Our research also shows that, despite policy regulations mandating person-centred care and the respect of residents' preferences, staff members in residential aged care facilities tend to prioritise more task-oriented aspects of care over person-centredness.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
When healthcare professionals' workloads are greater than available resources, care activities can be missed, omitted or delayed, potentially leading to adverse patient outcomes. Prioritisation, a precursor to missed care, involves decision-making about the order of care task completion based on perceived importance or urgency. Research on prioritisation and missed care has predominantly focused on acute care settings, which differ from residential aged care facilities in terms of funding, structure, staffing levels, skill mix, and approaches to care. The objective of this study was to investigate how care staff prioritise the care provided to residents living in residential aged care.
METHODS METHODS
Thirty-one staff members from five Australian residential aged care facilities engaged in a Q sorting activity by ranking 34 cards representing different care activities on a pre-defined grid from 'Least important' (- 4) to 'Most important' (+ 4). Concurrently, they participated in a think-aloud task, verbalising their decision-making processes. Following sorting, participants completed post-sorting interviews, a demographics questionnaire and semi-structured interviews. Q sort data were analysed using centroid factor analysis and varimax rotation in PQMethod. Factor arrays and data from the think-aloud task, field notes and interviews facilitated interpretation of the resulting factors.
RESULTS RESULTS
A four-factor solution, representing 22 participants and 62% of study variance, satisfied the selection criteria. The four distinct viewpoints represented by the solution were: 1. Prioritisation of clinical care, 2. Prioritisation of activities of daily living, 3. Humanistic approach to the prioritisation of care, and 4. Holistic approach to the prioritisation of care. Participants' prioritisation decisions were largely influenced by their occupations and perceived role responsibilities. Across the four viewpoints, residents having choices about their care ranked as a lower priority.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
This study has implications for missed care, as it demonstrates how care tasks deemed outside the scope of staff members' defined roles are often considered a lower priority. Our research also shows that, despite policy regulations mandating person-centred care and the respect of residents' preferences, staff members in residential aged care facilities tend to prioritise more task-oriented aspects of care over person-centredness.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32410685
doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05127-3
pii: 10.1186/s12913-020-05127-3
pmc: PMC7222492
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

423

Subventions

Organisme : Macquarie University
ID : 2017164

Références

Med Care. 2004 Feb;42(2 Suppl):II67-73
pubmed: 14734944
Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 Jun;52(6):1121-37
pubmed: 25794946
Gerontologist. 2019 Nov 27;:
pubmed: 31773131
Gerontologist. 2014 Feb;54 Suppl 1:S1-5
pubmed: 24443601
J Clin Nurs. 2009 Dec;18(24):3430-40
pubmed: 19538555
J Adv Nurs. 2004 Aug;47(4):427-36
pubmed: 15271162
Nurs Res. 2007 Nov-Dec;56(6):416-24
pubmed: 18004188
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 7;9(3):e027479
pubmed: 30850419
Behav Sci Law. 1995 Summer;13(3):415-23
pubmed: 10155260
Int J Qual Health Care. 2008 Aug;20(4):227-37
pubmed: 18436556
Scand J Caring Sci. 2010 Sep;24(3):533-40
pubmed: 20409056
Int J Soc Welf. 2012 Apr;21(2):139-148
pubmed: 24999303
Int J Qual Health Care. 2016 Jun;28(3):412-4
pubmed: 26980115
J Nurs Home Res Sci. 2016 Jan 1;2(1):41-49
pubmed: 28066839
Gerontologist. 2017 Jun 1;57(3):479-486
pubmed: 26874190
Nurs Ethics. 2016 Aug;23(5):490-506
pubmed: 25870176
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Feb;23(2):126-35
pubmed: 24214796
Kolner Z Soz Sozpsychol. 2017;69(Suppl 2):107-131
pubmed: 28989188
J Nurs Care Qual. 2006 Oct-Dec;21(4):306-13; quiz 314-5
pubmed: 16985399
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2014 Jan-Mar;29(1):3-25
pubmed: 23296644
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Sep;27(9):737-742
pubmed: 29650592
J Med Ethics. 2008 May;34(5):332-5
pubmed: 18448710
Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 Sep;52(9):1463-74
pubmed: 26032730
Int J Nurs Pract. 2005 Oct;11(5):214-20
pubmed: 16109045
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Feb;29(2):312-7
pubmed: 20056692
Health Aff (Millwood). 2001 May-Jun;20(3):43-53
pubmed: 11585181
J Gerontol Nurs. 2013 May;39(5):38-45
pubmed: 23506124
J Adv Nurs. 2009 Jul;65(7):1509-17
pubmed: 19456994
J Adv Nurs. 2009 Nov;65(11):2299-310
pubmed: 19737326
J Appl Gerontol. 2014 Sep;33(6):655-71
pubmed: 25143465
Geriatr Nurs. 2017 Jan - Feb;38(1):33-38
pubmed: 27492884
Gerontologist. 2019 Jul 16;59(4):635-643
pubmed: 29529210
Gerontologist. 2013 Feb;53(1):151-61
pubmed: 22565494
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Jun;27(11-12):2248-2259
pubmed: 28859254
Nurs Manage. 2011 Sep;42(9):16-22
pubmed: 21873843
Am J Occup Ther. 2000 Sep-Oct;54(5):504-8
pubmed: 11006810

Auteurs

Kristiana Ludlow (K)

Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Level 6, 75 Talavera Road, North Ryde, NSW, 2109, Australia. kristiana.ludlow@mq.edu.au.

Kate Churruca (K)

Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Level 6, 75 Talavera Road, North Ryde, NSW, 2109, Australia.

Virginia Mumford (V)

Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Level 6, 75 Talavera Road, North Ryde, NSW, 2109, Australia.

Louise A Ellis (LA)

Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Level 6, 75 Talavera Road, North Ryde, NSW, 2109, Australia.

Jeffrey Braithwaite (J)

Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Level 6, 75 Talavera Road, North Ryde, NSW, 2109, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH