Effectiveness of ustekinumab dose escalation in Crohn's disease patients with insufficient response to standard-dose subcutaneous maintenance therapy.


Journal

Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics
ISSN: 1365-2036
Titre abrégé: Aliment Pharmacol Ther
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8707234

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2020
Historique:
received: 24 02 2020
revised: 26 03 2020
accepted: 19 04 2020
pubmed: 16 5 2020
medline: 23 10 2020
entrez: 16 5 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Ustekinumab is effective in Crohn's disease. However, a substantial proportion of patients will not respond or lose response to ustekinumab. The current evidence to support the effectiveness of dose-optimisation for ustekinumab nonresponse is limited. To assess the effectiveness of dose escalation of ustekinumab. This was a multicentre retrospective cohort study. We included active Crohn's disease patients who received a standard-dose intravenous induction and at least one subcutaneous ustekinumab 90 mg dose. All enrolled patients received dose escalation by either shortening the interval between the doses to every 4 or 6 weeks, intravenous reinduction or a combination of strategies. The primary outcome of the study was clinical response at week 16 after dose escalation. A total of 142 patients (22 centres/14 countries) were included. The patients were dose-escalated after a median treatment duration of 30 weeks. At week 16 from escalation, 73/142 (51.4%) responded to treatment, including 55/142 (38.7%) in clinical remission. Corticosteroid-free remission was achieved in 6/34 (17.6%) patients on corticosteroids at the time of escalation; 118/142 (83%) continued treatment beyond week 16. Follow-up data beyond week 16 were available for 74/118 (62.7%) patients. On the last follow-up, 51/98 (52%) patients with available data responded to treatment, including 41/98 (42%) in clinical remission. Intensification of ustekinumab maintenance dosage was effective in over 50% of the patients. This strategy should be considered in patients who are nonresponsive to every 8 weeks ustekinumab maintenance dosing.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Ustekinumab is effective in Crohn's disease. However, a substantial proportion of patients will not respond or lose response to ustekinumab. The current evidence to support the effectiveness of dose-optimisation for ustekinumab nonresponse is limited.
AIM
To assess the effectiveness of dose escalation of ustekinumab.
METHODS
This was a multicentre retrospective cohort study. We included active Crohn's disease patients who received a standard-dose intravenous induction and at least one subcutaneous ustekinumab 90 mg dose. All enrolled patients received dose escalation by either shortening the interval between the doses to every 4 or 6 weeks, intravenous reinduction or a combination of strategies. The primary outcome of the study was clinical response at week 16 after dose escalation.
RESULTS
A total of 142 patients (22 centres/14 countries) were included. The patients were dose-escalated after a median treatment duration of 30 weeks. At week 16 from escalation, 73/142 (51.4%) responded to treatment, including 55/142 (38.7%) in clinical remission. Corticosteroid-free remission was achieved in 6/34 (17.6%) patients on corticosteroids at the time of escalation; 118/142 (83%) continued treatment beyond week 16. Follow-up data beyond week 16 were available for 74/118 (62.7%) patients. On the last follow-up, 51/98 (52%) patients with available data responded to treatment, including 41/98 (42%) in clinical remission.
CONCLUSIONS
Intensification of ustekinumab maintenance dosage was effective in over 50% of the patients. This strategy should be considered in patients who are nonresponsive to every 8 weeks ustekinumab maintenance dosing.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32412134
doi: 10.1111/apt.15784
doi:

Substances chimiques

Gastrointestinal Agents 0
Ustekinumab FU77B4U5Z0

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

135-142

Subventions

Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/S034919/1
Pays : United Kingdom

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

Rutgeerts P, Gasink C, Chan D, et al. Efficacy of ustekinumab for inducing endoscopic healing in patients with Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology. 2018;155:1045-1058.
Sandborn WJ, Gasink C, Gao L-L, et al. Ustekinumab induction and maintenance therapy in refractory Crohn's disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:1519-1528.
Sandborn WJ, Rutgeerts P, Gasink C, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of ustekinumab for Crohn's disease through the second year of therapy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018;48:65-77.
Sands BE, Sandborn WJ, Panaccione R, et al. Ustekinumab as induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:1201-1214.
Ahmed Z, Venkata K, Zhang N, et al. Comparative effectiveness of ustekinumab versus adalimumab in induction of clinical response and remission in Crohn's disease: experience of a real-world cohort at a tertiary care inflammatory bowel disease referral center. Gastroenterology Res. 2019;12:245-251.
Battat R, Kopylov U, Bessissow T, et al. Association between ustekinumab trough concentrations and clinical, biomarker, and endoscopic outcomes in patients with Crohn's disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;15:1427-1434.e2.
Biemans VBC, van der Meulen - de Jong AE, van der Woude CJ, et al. Ustekinumab for Crohn's disease: results of the ICC registry, a nationwide prospective observational cohort study. J Crohns Colitis. 2020;14:33-45.
Dayan JR, Dolinger M, Benkov K, et al. Real world experience with ustekinumab in children and young adults at a tertiary care pediatric inflammatory bowel disease center. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2019;69:61-67.
Engel T, Yung DE, Ma C, et al. Effectiveness and safety of Ustekinumab for Crohn's disease; systematic review and pooled analysis of real-world evidence. Dig Liver Dis. 2019;51:1232-1240.
Harris KA, Horst S, Gadani A, et al. Patients with refractory Crohn's disease successfully treated with ustekinumab. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2016;22:397-401.
Iborra M, Beltrán B, Fernández-Clotet A, et al. Real-world short-term effectiveness of ustekinumab in 305 patients with Crohn's disease: results from the ENEIDA registry. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019;50:278-288.
Kopylov U, Afif W, Cohen A, et al. Subcutaneous ustekinumab for the treatment of anti-TNF resistant Crohn's disease-the McGill experience. J Crohns Colitis. 2014;8:1516-1522.
Liefferinckx C, Verstockt B, Gils A, et al. Long-term clinical effectiveness of ustekinumab in patients with Crohn's disease who failed biologic therapies: a national cohort study. J Crohns Colitis. 2019;13:1401-1409.
Verstockt B, Dreesen E, Noman M, et al. Ustekinumab exposure-outcome analysis in Crohn's disease only in part explains limited endoscopic remission rates. J Crohns Colitis. 2019;13:864-872.
Wils P, Bouhnik Y, Michetti P, et al. Subcutaneous ustekinumab provides clinical benefit for two-thirds of patients with Crohn's disease refractory to anti-tumor necrosis factor agents. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;14:242-250.e2.
Khorrami S, Ginard D, Marin-Jimenez I, et al. Ustekinumab for the treatment of refractory Crohn's disease: the Spanish experience in a large multicentre open-label cohort. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2016;22:1662-1669.
Eberl A, Hallinen T, af Björkesten C-G, et al. Ustekinumab for Crohn's disease: a nationwide real-life cohort study from Finland (FINUSTE). Scand J Gastroenterol. 2019;54:718-725.
Harris RJ, McDonnell M, Young D, et al. Early real-world effectiveness of ustekinumab for Crohn’s disease. Frontline Gastroenterology. 2019;11(2):111-116.
Bar-Gil Shitrit A, Ben-Ya'acov A, Siterman M, et al. Safety and effectiveness of ustekinumab for induction of remission in patients with Crohn’s disease: a multicenter Israeli study. United Eur Gastroenterol J; 2050640620902956. [Epub ahead of print]. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050640620902956
Hanauer SB, Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, et al. IM-UNITI: three-year efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of ustekinumab treatment of Crohn's disease. J Crohns Colitis. 2020;14:23-32.
Fumery M, Peyrin-biroulet L, Nancey S, et al. OP24 Effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab 90 mg every 4 weeks in Crohn’s disease. J Crohns Colitis. 2019;13:S016-S016.
Park S, Evans E, Sandborn WJ, et al. Ustekinumab IV 6 mg/kg loading dose re-induction improves clinical and endoscopic response in Crohn's disease: a case series. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018;113:627-629.
Kopylov U, Mazor Y, Yavzori M, et al. Clinical utility of antihuman lambda chain-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) versus double antigen ELISA for the detection of anti-infliximab antibodies. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012;18:1628-1633.
Ben-Horin S, Chowers Y. Tailoring anti-TNF therapy in IBD: drug levels and disease activity. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;11:243-255.
Ungar B, Chowers Y, Yavzori M, et al. The temporal evolution of antidrug antibodies in patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with infliximab. Gut. 2014;63:1258-1264.
Ungar B, Levy I, Yavne Y, et al. Optimizing anti-TNF-alpha therapy: serum levels of infliximab and adalimumab are associated with mucosal healing in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;14:550-557. e2.
Adedokun OJ, Xu Z, Marano C, et al. Ustekinumab pharmacokinetics and exposure response in a phase 3 randomized trial of patients with ulcerative colitis: ustekinumab PK and exposure-response in UC. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019. pii: S1542-3565(19)31403-X. [Epub ahead of print]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2019.11.059
Vazquez Moron JM, Rodriguez Moncada R, Pallares MH. Intravenous ustekinumab reinduction as a Crohn's disease rescue strategy following a secondary non-response. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2019;111:721.

Auteurs

Jurij Hanzel (J)

Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Claire Liefferinckx (C)

Brussels, Belgium.

Davide De Marco (D)

Montreal, Canada.

Iria Baston-Rey (I)

Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

Richard J Harris (RJ)

Southampton, UK.

Marie Truyens (M)

Ghent, Belgium.

Viktor Domislovic (V)

Zagreb, Croatia.

Stephan Vavricka (S)

Zurich, Switzerland.

Vince Biemans (V)

Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Shomron Ben-Horin (S)

Tel Aviv, Israel.

Cyrielle Gilletta (C)

Toulouse, France.

Zuzana Zelinkova (Z)

Bratislava, Slovakia.

Roni Weisshof (R)

Haifa, Israel.

Darragh Storan (D)

Dublin, Ireland.

Klaudia Farkas (K)

Szeged, Hungary.

Tamas Molnar (T)

Szeged, Hungary.

Denis Franchimont (D)

Brussels, Belgium.

Anneline Cremer (A)

Brussels, Belgium.

Waqqas Afif (W)

Montreal, Canada.

Charles Lees (C)

Edinburgh, UK.

Manuel Barreiro-de Acosta (M)

Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

Triana Lobaton (T)

Ghent, Belgium.

Glen Doherty (G)

Dublin, Ireland.

Zeljko Krznaric (Z)

Haifa, Israel.

Marieke Pierik (M)

Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Frank Hoentjen (F)

Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

David Drobne (D)

Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH