Adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab monotherapy versus placebo in patients with resected stage IV melanoma with no evidence of disease (IMMUNED): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.


Journal

Lancet (London, England)
ISSN: 1474-547X
Titre abrégé: Lancet
Pays: England
ID NLM: 2985213R

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 05 2020
Historique:
received: 07 11 2019
revised: 07 02 2020
accepted: 12 02 2020
entrez: 18 5 2020
pubmed: 18 5 2020
medline: 28 5 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Nivolumab and ipilimumab, alone or in combination, are widely used immunotherapeutic treatment options for patients with advanced-ie, unresectable or metastatic-melanoma. This criterion, however, excludes patients with stage IV melanoma with no evidence of disease. We therefore aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab monotherapy versus a placebo in this patient population. We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial in 20 German academic medical centres. Eligible patients were aged 18-80 years with stage IV melanoma with no evidence of disease after surgery or radiotherapy. Key exclusion criteria included uveal or mucosal melanoma, previous therapy with checkpoint inhibitors, and any previous immunosuppressive therapy within the 30 days before study drug administration. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1), using a central, interactive, online system, to the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group (1 mg/kg of intravenous nivolumab every 3 weeks plus 3 mg/kg of intravenous ipilimumab every 3 weeks for four doses, followed by 3 mg/kg of nivolumab every 2 weeks), nivolumab monotherapy group (3 mg/kg of intravenous nivolumab every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab-matching placebo during weeks 1-12), or double-matching placebo group. The primary endpoint was the recurrence-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. The results presented in this report reflect the prespecified interim analysis of recurrence-free survival after 90 events had been reported. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02523313, and is ongoing. Between Sept 2, 2015, and Nov 20, 2018, 167 patients were randomly assigned to receive nivolumab plus ipilimumab (n=56), nivolumab (n=59), or placebo (n=52). As of July 2, 2019, at a median follow-up of 28·4 months (IQR 17·7-36·8), median recurrence-free survival was not reached in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group, whereas median recurrence-free survival was 12·4 months (95% CI 5·3-33·3) in the nivolumab group and 6·4 months (3·3-9·6) in the placebo group. The hazard ratio for recurrence for the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group versus placebo group was 0·23 (97·5% CI 0·12-0·45; p<0·0001), and for the nivolumab group versus placebo group was 0·56 (0·33-0·94; p=0·011). In the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group, recurrence-free survival at 1 year was 75% (95% CI 61·0-84·9) and at 2 years was 70% (55·1-81·0); in the nivolumab group, 1-year recurrence-free survival was 52% (38·1-63·9) and at 2 years was 42% (28·6-54·5); and in the placebo group, this rate was 32% (19·8-45·3) at 1 year and 14% (5·9-25·7) at 2 years. Treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events were reported in 71% (95% CI 57-82) of patients in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group and in 27% (16-40) of those in the nivolumab group. Treatment-related adverse events of any grade led to treatment discontinuation in 34 (62%) of 55 patients in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group and seven (13%) of 56 in the nivolumab group. Three deaths from adverse events were reported but were considered unrelated to the study treatment. Adjuvant therapy with nivolumab alone or in combination with ipilimumab increased recurrence-free survival significantly compared with placebo in patients with stage IV melanoma with no evidence of disease. The rates of grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events in both active treatment groups were higher than the rates reported in previous pivotal trials done in advanced melanoma with measurable disease. Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Nivolumab and ipilimumab, alone or in combination, are widely used immunotherapeutic treatment options for patients with advanced-ie, unresectable or metastatic-melanoma. This criterion, however, excludes patients with stage IV melanoma with no evidence of disease. We therefore aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab monotherapy versus a placebo in this patient population.
METHODS
We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial in 20 German academic medical centres. Eligible patients were aged 18-80 years with stage IV melanoma with no evidence of disease after surgery or radiotherapy. Key exclusion criteria included uveal or mucosal melanoma, previous therapy with checkpoint inhibitors, and any previous immunosuppressive therapy within the 30 days before study drug administration. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1), using a central, interactive, online system, to the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group (1 mg/kg of intravenous nivolumab every 3 weeks plus 3 mg/kg of intravenous ipilimumab every 3 weeks for four doses, followed by 3 mg/kg of nivolumab every 2 weeks), nivolumab monotherapy group (3 mg/kg of intravenous nivolumab every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab-matching placebo during weeks 1-12), or double-matching placebo group. The primary endpoint was the recurrence-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. The results presented in this report reflect the prespecified interim analysis of recurrence-free survival after 90 events had been reported. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02523313, and is ongoing.
FINDINGS
Between Sept 2, 2015, and Nov 20, 2018, 167 patients were randomly assigned to receive nivolumab plus ipilimumab (n=56), nivolumab (n=59), or placebo (n=52). As of July 2, 2019, at a median follow-up of 28·4 months (IQR 17·7-36·8), median recurrence-free survival was not reached in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group, whereas median recurrence-free survival was 12·4 months (95% CI 5·3-33·3) in the nivolumab group and 6·4 months (3·3-9·6) in the placebo group. The hazard ratio for recurrence for the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group versus placebo group was 0·23 (97·5% CI 0·12-0·45; p<0·0001), and for the nivolumab group versus placebo group was 0·56 (0·33-0·94; p=0·011). In the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group, recurrence-free survival at 1 year was 75% (95% CI 61·0-84·9) and at 2 years was 70% (55·1-81·0); in the nivolumab group, 1-year recurrence-free survival was 52% (38·1-63·9) and at 2 years was 42% (28·6-54·5); and in the placebo group, this rate was 32% (19·8-45·3) at 1 year and 14% (5·9-25·7) at 2 years. Treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events were reported in 71% (95% CI 57-82) of patients in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group and in 27% (16-40) of those in the nivolumab group. Treatment-related adverse events of any grade led to treatment discontinuation in 34 (62%) of 55 patients in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group and seven (13%) of 56 in the nivolumab group. Three deaths from adverse events were reported but were considered unrelated to the study treatment.
INTERPRETATION
Adjuvant therapy with nivolumab alone or in combination with ipilimumab increased recurrence-free survival significantly compared with placebo in patients with stage IV melanoma with no evidence of disease. The rates of grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events in both active treatment groups were higher than the rates reported in previous pivotal trials done in advanced melanoma with measurable disease.
FUNDING
Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32416781
pii: S0140-6736(20)30417-7
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30417-7
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Adjuvants, Immunologic 0
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological 0
Ipilimumab 0
Nivolumab 31YO63LBSN

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02523313']

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase II Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1558-1568

Investigateurs

Carola Berking (C)
Rudolf A Herbst (RA)
Uwe M Martens (UM)
Sabine Sell (S)
Rudolf Stadler (R)
Patrick Terheyden (P)
Jochen Utikal (J)

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Lisa Zimmer (L)

Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.

Elisabeth Livingstone (E)

Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.

Jessica C Hassel (JC)

Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Michael Fluck (M)

Department of Oncology Hornheide, Fachklinik Hornheide, Münster, Germany.

Thomas Eigentler (T)

Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Carmen Loquai (C)

Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany.

Sebastian Haferkamp (S)

Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Ralf Gutzmer (R)

Skin Cancer Center Hannover, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

Friedegund Meier (F)

Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Dresden, Dresden, Germany.

Peter Mohr (P)

Department of Dermatology, Elbe-Kliniken, Buxtehude, Germany.

Axel Hauschild (A)

Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.

Bastian Schilling (B)

Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.

Christian Menzer (C)

Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Felix Kieker (F)

Department of Dermatology, Charité Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany.

Edgar Dippel (E)

Department of Dermatology, Ludwigshafen Medical Center, Ludwigshafen, Germany.

Alexander Rösch (A)

Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.

Jan-Christoph Simon (JC)

Department of Dermatology, Leipzig University Hospital Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.

Beate Conrad (B)

Department of Oncology Hornheide, Fachklinik Hornheide, Münster, Germany.

Silvia Körner (S)

Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Christine Windemuth-Kieselbach (C)

Alcedis GmbH, Giessen, Germany.

Leonora Schwarz (L)

Alcedis GmbH, Giessen, Germany.

Claus Garbe (C)

Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Jürgen C Becker (JC)

Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Translational Skin Cancer Research, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen, Medical Faculty, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.

Dirk Schadendorf (D)

Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. Electronic address: dirk.schadendorf@uk-essen.de.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH