Concurrent cisplatin and dose escalation with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) versus conventional radiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC): GORTEC 2004-01 randomized phase III trial.

Chemoradiotherapy Cisplatin Head and Neck Neoplasms / radiotherapy Humans Radiotherapy Dosage Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated / adverse effects Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck / therapy

Cisplatin Concurrent chemoradiotherapy Dose escalation Head and neck cancer IMRT Intensity-modulated radiotherapy

Journal

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology

ISSN: 1879-0887

Titre abrégé: Radiother Oncol

Pays: Ireland

ID NLM: 8407192

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2020

Historique:

received: 27 01 2020

revised: 20 04 2020

accepted: 11 05 2020

pubmed: 18 5 2020

medline: 15 4 2021

entrez: 18 5 2020

Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard of care (SoC) in locally advanced (LA) head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). This trial was designed to test whether dose-escalated IMRT and cisplatin could improve locoregional control without increasing complications over 3D-radiotherapy. Patients were randomized between 70 Gy/35F in 7 weeks with 3D-RT (Arm A) versus 75 Gy/35F with IMRT (Arm B). Both arms received 50 Gy in 25 fractions followed by a sequential boost of 20 Gy/10F in Arm A and 25 Gy/10F to gross tumor volume in Arm B, as well as 3 cycles of cisplatin at 100 mg/m2 during RT. The primary endpoint was locoregional progression (LRP). 188 patients were randomized: 85% oropharynx and 73% stage IVa. P16 status was documented for 137 oropharyngeal tumors with P16+ in 53 (39%) patients; and 90% were smokers. Median follow-up was 60.5 months. Xerostomia was markedly decreased in arm B (p < 0.0001). The 1-year grade ≥2 xerostomia (RTOG criteria) was 63% vs 23% and 3-year 45% vs 11% in arms A and B, respectively. Xerostomia LENT-SOMA scale was also reduced in arm B. Dose-escalated IMRT did not reduce LRP with an adjusted HR of 1.13 [95%CI = 0.64-1.98] (p = 0.68). Survival was not different (adjusted HR: 1.19 [95%CI = 0.78-1.81], p = 0.42). No interaction between p16 and treatment effect was found. Dose-escalated IMRT did not improve LRC in LA-HNSCC patients treated with concomitant CRT over standard 3D-RT. This trial reinforces the evidence showing IMRT reduces xerostomia in LA-HNSCC treated with radiotherapy. Clinicaltrial.gov: NCT00158678.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND

METHODS

Patients were randomized between 70 Gy/35F in 7 weeks with 3D-RT (Arm A) versus 75 Gy/35F with IMRT (Arm B). Both arms received 50 Gy in 25 fractions followed by a sequential boost of 20 Gy/10F in Arm A and 25 Gy/10F to gross tumor volume in Arm B, as well as 3 cycles of cisplatin at 100 mg/m2 during RT. The primary endpoint was locoregional progression (LRP).

RESULTS

188 patients were randomized: 85% oropharynx and 73% stage IVa. P16 status was documented for 137 oropharyngeal tumors with P16+ in 53 (39%) patients; and 90% were smokers. Median follow-up was 60.5 months. Xerostomia was markedly decreased in arm B (p < 0.0001). The 1-year grade ≥2 xerostomia (RTOG criteria) was 63% vs 23% and 3-year 45% vs 11% in arms A and B, respectively. Xerostomia LENT-SOMA scale was also reduced in arm B. Dose-escalated IMRT did not reduce LRP with an adjusted HR of 1.13 [95%CI = 0.64-1.98] (p = 0.68). Survival was not different (adjusted HR: 1.19 [95%CI = 0.78-1.81], p = 0.42). No interaction between p16 and treatment effect was found.

CONCLUSION

Dose-escalated IMRT did not improve LRC in LA-HNSCC patients treated with concomitant CRT over standard 3D-RT. This trial reinforces the evidence showing IMRT reduces xerostomia in LA-HNSCC treated with radiotherapy. Clinicaltrial.gov: NCT00158678.

Identifiants

DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.05.021 PMID: 32417348

pubmed: 32417348

pii: S0167-8140(20)30274-7

doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.05.021

pii:

doi:

Substances chimiques

Cisplatin Q20Q21Q62J

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov

['NCT00158678']

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase III Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

Pagination

18-25

Informations de copyright

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.