Skin Closure Tape and Surgical Staples in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Journal
BioMed research international
ISSN: 2314-6141
Titre abrégé: Biomed Res Int
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101600173
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
27
03
2019
revised:
15
07
2019
accepted:
22
11
2019
entrez:
19
5
2020
pubmed:
19
5
2020
medline:
19
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Staples closure technology has been widely used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and achieved good results. In recent years, a new type of material called skin closure tape (SCT) has been applied to TKA which also showed good treatment results. However, since it is still not clear yet which one is better, this paper collects literatures for statistical analysis so as to provide evidence for the use of SCT in TKA. The comparative study on effects between SCT and staples is reviewed after the primary release of TKA in PubMed, the Cochrane library, and the EMBASE database up to March 2019. The two researchers independently screened the literature and evaluated the quality of the literature using bias risk tools. A total of four studies (3330 knees) have been included in our meta-analysis. For the main point, the results show that the SCT can reduce readmission rates compared to staples (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.49-0.95, Our study indicates SCT as a closure method with fewer complications and faster speed compared with staples. Nevertheless, the cost and pain need to be further confirmed because of the small sample size included in this study.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Staples closure technology has been widely used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and achieved good results. In recent years, a new type of material called skin closure tape (SCT) has been applied to TKA which also showed good treatment results. However, since it is still not clear yet which one is better, this paper collects literatures for statistical analysis so as to provide evidence for the use of SCT in TKA.
METHODS
METHODS
The comparative study on effects between SCT and staples is reviewed after the primary release of TKA in PubMed, the Cochrane library, and the EMBASE database up to March 2019. The two researchers independently screened the literature and evaluated the quality of the literature using bias risk tools.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of four studies (3330 knees) have been included in our meta-analysis. For the main point, the results show that the SCT can reduce readmission rates compared to staples (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.49-0.95,
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our study indicates SCT as a closure method with fewer complications and faster speed compared with staples. Nevertheless, the cost and pain need to be further confirmed because of the small sample size included in this study.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32420346
doi: 10.1155/2020/4827617
pmc: PMC7199617
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
4827617Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Xiangli Luo et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Références
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 May;109:20-29
pubmed: 30579979
J Clin Anesth. 2010 Jun;22(4):233-6
pubmed: 20522350
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2004 Dec;12(2):191-3
pubmed: 15621905
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2006 Jun;16(2):124-129
pubmed: 28755123
J Surg Res. 2017 Jul;215:167-172
pubmed: 28688643
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Jan;93:45-55
pubmed: 29111471
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Feb;88(2):238-42
pubmed: 16434531
Knee. 2017 Oct;24(5):1221-1226
pubmed: 28797879
J Wound Care. 2018 Apr 1;27(Sup4):S12-S22
pubmed: 29641342
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000 May;82(4):561-5
pubmed: 10855883
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 20;6(1):e009257
pubmed: 26792213
Int Wound J. 2017 Feb;14(1):250-254
pubmed: 27019972
Ann Epidemiol. 2014 Sep;24(9):660-5
pubmed: 25088754
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Sep;32(9):2920-2927
pubmed: 28487090
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015 Aug;25(6):1105-10
pubmed: 25976120
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 May;68(5):574-83
pubmed: 25638457
Sci Rep. 2016 Jan 25;6:19764
pubmed: 26805714
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013 Jun;37(3):529-37
pubmed: 23613192
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Oct;467(10):2606-12
pubmed: 19360453
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017 Jan;27(1):113-118
pubmed: 27600333
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2014;81(3):233-7
pubmed: 24945393
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Apr;89(4):780-5
pubmed: 17403800
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jun;74:73-9
pubmed: 26780259
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 May;85:50-58
pubmed: 28063911
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Jun;98:1-8
pubmed: 29292204
Orthopedics. 2012 May;35(5):e641-6
pubmed: 22588404