DPD status and fluoropyrimidines-based treatment: high activity matters too.


Journal

BMC cancer
ISSN: 1471-2407
Titre abrégé: BMC Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967800

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 May 2020
Historique:
received: 02 12 2019
accepted: 27 04 2020
entrez: 20 5 2020
pubmed: 20 5 2020
medline: 13 1 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) status is an indicator of a marked risk for toxicity following fluoropyrimidine (FP)-based chemotherapy. This notion is well-established for low DPD status but little is known about the clinical impact of high DPD activity. This study examined the possible link between high intrinsic lymphocytic DPD activity and overall survival, progression free survival and response to FP-based treatment in patients treated in our institution. Lymphocytic DPD activity was assessed in a group of 136 patients receiving FP-based chemotherapy from 2004 to 2016. There were 105 digestive (77.2%), 24 breast (17.6%) and 7 head and neck cancers (5.2%). Cox or logistic regression models were applied with adjustment on all confounding factors that could modify OS, PFS or response. All models were stratified on the three cancer locations. A cut-off for DPD activity was assessed graphically and analytically. An optimal cut-off for DPD activity at 0.30 nmol/min/mg protein was identified as the best value for discriminating survivals and response. In multivariate analysis, individual lymphocytic DPD activity was significantly related to overall survival (p = 0.013; HR: 3.35 CI95%[1.27-8.86]), progression-free survival (p < 0.001; HR: 3.15 CI95%[1.75-5.66]) and response rate (p = 0.033; HR: 0.33 CI95%[0.12-0.92]) with a marked detrimental effect associated with high DPD activity. DPD status screening should result in a two-pronged approach with FP dose reduction in case of low intrinsic DPD and, inversely, an increased FP dose for high intrinsic DPD. In a context of personalized FP-based treatment, this innovative strategy needs to be prospectively validated.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) status is an indicator of a marked risk for toxicity following fluoropyrimidine (FP)-based chemotherapy. This notion is well-established for low DPD status but little is known about the clinical impact of high DPD activity. This study examined the possible link between high intrinsic lymphocytic DPD activity and overall survival, progression free survival and response to FP-based treatment in patients treated in our institution.
METHODS METHODS
Lymphocytic DPD activity was assessed in a group of 136 patients receiving FP-based chemotherapy from 2004 to 2016. There were 105 digestive (77.2%), 24 breast (17.6%) and 7 head and neck cancers (5.2%). Cox or logistic regression models were applied with adjustment on all confounding factors that could modify OS, PFS or response. All models were stratified on the three cancer locations. A cut-off for DPD activity was assessed graphically and analytically.
RESULTS RESULTS
An optimal cut-off for DPD activity at 0.30 nmol/min/mg protein was identified as the best value for discriminating survivals and response. In multivariate analysis, individual lymphocytic DPD activity was significantly related to overall survival (p = 0.013; HR: 3.35 CI95%[1.27-8.86]), progression-free survival (p < 0.001; HR: 3.15 CI95%[1.75-5.66]) and response rate (p = 0.033; HR: 0.33 CI95%[0.12-0.92]) with a marked detrimental effect associated with high DPD activity.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
DPD status screening should result in a two-pronged approach with FP dose reduction in case of low intrinsic DPD and, inversely, an increased FP dose for high intrinsic DPD. In a context of personalized FP-based treatment, this innovative strategy needs to be prospectively validated.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32423482
doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06907-0
pii: 10.1186/s12885-020-06907-0
pmc: PMC7236295
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biomarkers, Tumor 0
Capecitabine 6804DJ8Z9U
Dihydrouracil Dehydrogenase (NADP) EC 1.3.1.2
Leucovorin Q573I9DVLP
Fluorouracil U3P01618RT

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

436

Références

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 May 30;114(22):E4442-E4451
pubmed: 28416670
PLoS One. 2017 May 8;12(5):e0175998
pubmed: 28481884
Br J Cancer. 2018 Apr;118(7):947-954
pubmed: 29515256
Eur J Cancer. 2004 May;40(7):939-50
pubmed: 15093568
Clin Cancer Res. 1996 Mar;2(3):507-10
pubmed: 9816197
Cancer Res. 2014 May 1;74(9):2545-54
pubmed: 24648345
Cancer Res. 1993 Nov 15;53(22):5433-8
pubmed: 8221682
J Clin Oncol. 1994 Nov;12(11):2248-53
pubmed: 7964939
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Jun 8;103(11):863-75
pubmed: 21597022
Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2017 Mar;1863(3):721-730
pubmed: 28024938
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Dec;16(16):1639-50
pubmed: 26603945
Mol Cancer Ther. 2014 Mar;13(3):742-51
pubmed: 24401318
Cancer Res. 2016 Nov 1;76(21):6362-6373
pubmed: 27578004
J Clin Oncol. 1994 Jun;12(6):1291-5
pubmed: 8201391
Biochem Pharmacol. 1988 Dec 15;37(24):4759-62
pubmed: 3202908
Eur J Cancer. 2000 Jan;36(1):37-42
pubmed: 10741292
J Clin Oncol. 1995 Jul;13(7):1663-70
pubmed: 7602356
Eur J Cancer. 1994;30A(10):1517-22
pubmed: 7833111
JIMD Rep. 2019;45:65-69
pubmed: 30349988
Cell. 2018 Sep 6;174(6):1559-1570.e22
pubmed: 30100185
Cancer Res. 1990 Jan 1;50(1):197-201
pubmed: 2293556
Cancer. 2012 Jun 1;118(11):2935-43
pubmed: 22020693
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 29;7(1):9711
pubmed: 28851987
Dis Markers. 2017;2017:9202676
pubmed: 28255193
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Nov;19(11):1459-1467
pubmed: 30348537
J Clin Oncol. 2008 May 1;26(13):2099-105
pubmed: 18445839
Br J Cancer. 2014 May 27;110(11):2728-37
pubmed: 24800948
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Feb;103(2):210-216
pubmed: 29152729

Auteurs

Emmanuel Chamorey (E)

Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Université Côte d'Azur, 33 Avenue de Valombrose, 06189 Nice Cedex 2, Nice, France. emmanuel.chamorey@nice.unicancer.fr.

Eric Francois (E)

Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Medical Oncology, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.

Marie-Christine Etienne (MC)

Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Oncopharmacology Unit, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.

Jean-Marc Ferrero (JM)

Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Medical Oncology, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.

Frederic Peyrade (F)

Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Medical Oncology, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.

Emmanuel Barranger (E)

Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Surgical Oncology, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.

Alexandre Bozec (A)

Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Institut Universitaire de la Face et du Cou, Head and Neck Surgery, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.

Rémy Largillier (R)

Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Medical Oncology, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.

Ophelie Cassuto (O)

Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Medical Oncology, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.

Julien Viotti (J)

Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Université Côte d'Azur, 33 Avenue de Valombrose, 06189 Nice Cedex 2, Nice, France.

Renaud Schiappa (R)

Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Université Côte d'Azur, 33 Avenue de Valombrose, 06189 Nice Cedex 2, Nice, France.

Gérard Milano (G)

Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Oncopharmacology Unit, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH