Validation of an optical, computer-assisted technique for intraoperative tracking of 3-dimensional canine stifle joint motion.
Computer-assisted technique
Cranial cruciate ligament
Dog
Stifle joint
Journal
Open veterinary journal
ISSN: 2218-6050
Titre abrégé: Open Vet J
Pays: Libya
ID NLM: 101653182
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2020
04 2020
Historique:
received:
01
08
2019
accepted:
05
03
2020
entrez:
20
5
2020
pubmed:
20
5
2020
medline:
10
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Cranial cruciate ligament (CCL) rupture is the most common orthopedic pathology in dog and in men. In human, optical computer-assisted technique is considered as a repeatable and reliable method for the biomechanical assessment of joint kinematics and laxity in case of CCL surgery. To evaluate the repeatability and reliability afforded by clinical tests in terms of laxity measured by means of a computer-assisted tracking system in two canine CCL conditions: CCL-Intact, CCL-Deficient. Fourteen fresh frozen canine stifles were passively subjected to Internal/External (IE) rotation at 120° of flexion and Cranial drawer test (CC). To quantify the repeatability and the reliability, intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and the mean percent error were evaluated (Δ The study showed a very good intra-class correlation, before and after CCL resection for kinematics tests. It was found a minimum ICC = 0.73 during the IE rotation in CCL-Intact and a maximum value of ICC = 0.97 for the CC displacement in CC-Deficient. IE rotation with CCL-Intact is the condition with the greatest Δ The presented work underlined the possibility of using a computer-assisted method also for biomechanical studies concerning stifle kinematics and laxity.
Sections du résumé
Background
Cranial cruciate ligament (CCL) rupture is the most common orthopedic pathology in dog and in men. In human, optical computer-assisted technique is considered as a repeatable and reliable method for the biomechanical assessment of joint kinematics and laxity in case of CCL surgery.
Aim
To evaluate the repeatability and reliability afforded by clinical tests in terms of laxity measured by means of a computer-assisted tracking system in two canine CCL conditions: CCL-Intact, CCL-Deficient.
Methods
Fourteen fresh frozen canine stifles were passively subjected to Internal/External (IE) rotation at 120° of flexion and Cranial drawer test (CC). To quantify the repeatability and the reliability, intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and the mean percent error were evaluated (Δ
Results
The study showed a very good intra-class correlation, before and after CCL resection for kinematics tests. It was found a minimum ICC = 0.73 during the IE rotation in CCL-Intact and a maximum value of ICC = 0.97 for the CC displacement in CC-Deficient. IE rotation with CCL-Intact is the condition with the greatest Δ
Conclusion
The presented work underlined the possibility of using a computer-assisted method also for biomechanical studies concerning stifle kinematics and laxity.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32426262
doi: 10.4314/ovj.v10i1.14
pii: OVJ-10-86
pmc: PMC7193875
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Validation Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
86-93Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The Authors declares that there is no conflict of interest.
Références
Orthopedics. 2013 Aug;36(8):631-42
pubmed: 23937743
J Orthop Res. 2010 Feb;28(2):164-9
pubmed: 19642114
Vet Surg. 2010 Jun;39(4):399-409
pubmed: 20345536
Arthroscopy. 2003 Feb;19(2):154-60
pubmed: 12579148
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2011;24(3):167-77
pubmed: 21373714
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006 Sep;14(9):811-6
pubmed: 16673146
Comput Biol Med. 2007 Jun;37(6):872-8
pubmed: 17118353
Vet Surg. 2006 Dec;35(8):769-80
pubmed: 17187639
Comput Aided Surg. 2002;7(1):25-40
pubmed: 12173878
Clin Orthop Surg. 2011 Dec;3(4):259-67
pubmed: 22162787
J Biomech Eng. 1983 May;105(2):136-44
pubmed: 6865355
J Arthroplasty. 2008 Feb;23(2):304-7
pubmed: 18280429
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 Apr;20(4):652-62
pubmed: 22246549
Vet Surg. 2010 Apr;39(3):343-9
pubmed: 20522214
Vet Surg. 2010 Apr;39(3):315-23
pubmed: 20345535
J Biomech. 2002 Apr;35(4):543-8
pubmed: 11934426
Can J Vet Res. 2007 Jul;71(3):175-80
pubmed: 17695591
J Small Anim Pract. 2015 Jun;56(6):398-406
pubmed: 25808793
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2013;26(4):271-9
pubmed: 23857571
Am J Vet Res. 1985 Sep;46(9):1842-54
pubmed: 3901837
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1984 Mar 1;184(5):564-9
pubmed: 6706801
Can Vet J. 1995 Apr;36(4):250-1
pubmed: 7600520
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1999 Sep 15;215(6):811-4
pubmed: 10496133
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2010 Mar;25(3):206-12
pubmed: 20006913
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84-A Suppl 2:90-8
pubmed: 12479344
Acta Orthop. 2011 Jun;82(3):293-300
pubmed: 21504309
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Apr;21(4):784-8
pubmed: 22878438