Integration of automation into an existing clinical workflow to improve efficiency and reduce errors in the manual treatment planning process for total body irradiation (TBI).
TBI
automation
incident learning systems
Journal
Journal of applied clinical medical physics
ISSN: 1526-9914
Titre abrégé: J Appl Clin Med Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101089176
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2020
Jul 2020
Historique:
received:
29
10
2019
revised:
01
04
2020
accepted:
03
04
2020
pubmed:
20
5
2020
medline:
22
6
2021
entrez:
20
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To identify causes of error, and present the concept of an automated technique that improves efficiency and helps to reduce transcription and manual data entry errors in the treatment planning of total body irradiation (TBI). Analysis of incidents submitted to incident learning system (ILS) was performed to identify potential avenues for improvement by implementation of automation of the manual treatment planning process for total body irradiation (TBI). Following this analysis, it became obvious that while the individual components of the TBI treatment planning process were well implemented, the manual 'bridging' of the components (transcribing data, manual data entry etc.) were leading to high potential for error. A C#-based plug-in treatment planning script was developed to remove the manual parts of the treatment planning workflow that were contributing to increased risk. Here we present an example of the implementation of "Glue" programming, combining treatment planning C# scripts with existing spreadsheet calculation worksheets. Prior to the implementation of automation, 35 incident reports related to the TBI treatment process were submitted to the ILS over a 6-year period, with an average of 1.4 ± 1.7 reports submitted per quarter. While no incidents reached patients, reports ranged from minor documentation issues to potential for mistreatment if not caught before delivery. Since the implementation of automated treatment planning and documentation, treatment planning time per patient, including documentation, has been reduced; from an average of 45 min pre-automation to <20 min post-automation. Manual treatment planning techniques may be well validated, but they are time-intensive and have potential for error. Often the barrier to automating these techniques becomes the time required to "re-code" existing solutions in unfamiliar computer languages. We present the workflow here as a proof of concept that automation may help to improve clinical efficiency and safety for special procedures.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32426947
doi: 10.1002/acm2.12894
pmc: PMC7386186
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
100-106Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
Références
Radiother Oncol. 2005 Mar;74(3):283-91
pubmed: 15763309
Med Phys. 2020 Mar;47(3):e52-e64
pubmed: 31883390
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2019;75(2):151-159
pubmed: 30787221
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Nov 15;81(4):e673-9
pubmed: 21669503
Anticancer Res. 2016 Sep;36(9):4859-64
pubmed: 27630341
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Feb 1;94(2):349-59
pubmed: 26853343
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Nov - Dec;7(6):418-424
pubmed: 28688909
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jan 1;103(1):180-189
pubmed: 30205123
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2019 Jul;29(3):209-218
pubmed: 31027638
Med Phys. 2014 Jan;41(1):010901
pubmed: 24387492
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Apr 1;58(5):1616-34
pubmed: 15050343
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2019 Mar;9(2):e218-e227
pubmed: 30562615
Am J Clin Oncol. 2013 Feb;36(1):97-101
pubmed: 23334484
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2005 Summer;6(3):81-94
pubmed: 16143793
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Dec 1;90(5):1202-7
pubmed: 25442045
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 Jan 08;17(1):387-395
pubmed: 26894365
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 Nov 08;17(6):16-31
pubmed: 27929478
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994 Jan 15;28(2):343-7
pubmed: 8276648
Br J Radiol. 2007 May;80(953):297-301
pubmed: 17638841
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018 Nov;19(6):298-305
pubmed: 30225861
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Aug;20(8):29-35
pubmed: 31313508
Br J Cancer. 2004 Jun 1;90(11):2080-4
pubmed: 15150598
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2008 Jul;18(3):201-6
pubmed: 18513630
Cureus. 2018 Dec 6;10(12):e3696
pubmed: 30788187
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2019 Jul - Aug;9(4):257-265
pubmed: 30826481