Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in Super-obese and Non-Super-obese Patients.
Journal
Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques
ISSN: 1534-4908
Titre abrégé: Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100888751
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2020
Oct 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
20
5
2020
medline:
25
11
2021
entrez:
20
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The primary aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of sleeve gastrectomy (SG) in super-obese patients. The secondary aim was to identify patient characteristics associated with worse SG outcomes in this group. A retrospective analysis was carried out of our electronic prospective bariatric surgery patient database, including all patients who underwent SG between January 2007 and January 2017. The sample was divided according to the initial body mass index (BMI) (> or <50 kg/m). The initial characteristics and results in terms of weight loss and comorbidity resolution between the groups were compared. A subanalysis of the variable distributions was carried out according to whether or not the final BMI in the super-obese group had reached <35 kg/m. Data analysis was carried out using STATA 13.1, with a P-value <0.05 considered to be significant. The mean initial BMI was 42.8 kg/m in group 1 (<50 kg/m) and 55 kg/m in group 2 (>50 kg/m). The median follow-up (FU) was 56.2 months. Maximum weight loss was attained at the 18-month FU in both groups (BMI: 28.8 and 34.7 kg/m, respectively). At the 5-year FU, percentage of total weight loss was higher in group 2 and percentage of excess weight loss was statistically higher in group 1 (29.6% vs. 33.1% and 67% vs. 59%, respectively). Outcomes for type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia were similar in both groups. The variables associated with attaining a final BMI <35 kg/m in the super-obese group were lower initial BMI, absence of baseline weight-related conditions (type 2 diabetes mellitus, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, home continuous positive airway pressure, arthropathy, heart disease), and absence of gastroesophageal reflux disease. We observed a statistically significant increase in poor outcomes in patients with a higher initial BMI and with weight-related comorbidities. These parameters could be considered to be potentially good predictors of less satisfactory outcomes in the super-obese patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32427745
doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000801
pii: 00129689-202010000-00002
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
403-409Références
Arroyo-Johnson C, Mincey KD. Obesity epidemiology worldwide. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2016;45:571–579.
Schauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP, et al. STAMPEDE Investigators. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes—5-year outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:641–651.
Regan JP, Inabnet WB, Gagner M, et al. Early experience with two-stage laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as an alternative in the super-super obese patient. Obes Surg. 2003;13:861–864.
Gumbs AA, Gagner M, Dakin G, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2007;17:962–969.
Gagner M, Gumbs AA, Milone L, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for the super-super-obese (body mass index >60 kg/m2). Surg Today. 2008;38:399–403.
Ali M, El Chaar M, Ghiassi S, et al. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Clinical Issues Committee. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery updated position statement on sleeve gastrectomy as a bariatric procedure. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13:1652–1657.
De Luca M, Angrisani L, Himpens J, et al. Indications for surgery of obesity and weight-related diseases: position statements from the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO). Obes Surg. 2016;26:1659–1696.
Diniz Mde F, Passos VM, Barreto SM, et al. Different criteria for assessment of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass success: does only weight matter? Obes Surg. 2009;19:1384–1392.
Biron S, Hould FS, Lebel S, et al. Twenty years of biliopancreatic diversion: what is the goal of the surgery? Obes Surg. 2004;14:160–164.
Gagner M, Hutchinson C, Rosenthal R. Fifth International Consensus Conference: current status of sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12:750–756.
Alvarenga ES, Lo Menzo E, Szomstein S, et al. Safety and efficacy of 1020 consecutive laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomies performed as a primary treatment modality for morbid obesity. A single-center experience from the metabolic and bariatric surgical accreditation quality and improvement program. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:2673–2678.
Brethauer SA, Hammel JP, Schauer PR. Systematic review of sleeve gastrectomy as staging and primary bariatric procedure. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5:469–475.
Shoar S, Saber AA. Long-term and midterm outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Ygastric bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13:170–180.
Noel P, Nedelcu M, Eddbali I, et al. What are the long-term results 8 years after sleeve gastrectomy? Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13:1110–1115.
Eid GM, Brethauer S, Mattar SG, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for super obese patients: forty-eight percent excess weight loss after 6 to 8 years with 93% follow-up. Ann Surg. 2012;256:262–265.
Arman GA, Himpens J, Dhaenens J, et al. Long-term (11+ years) outcomes in weight, patient satisfaction, comorbidities, and gastroesophageal reflux treatment after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12:1778–1786.
Castagneto Gissey L, Casella Mariolo JR, Genco A, et al. 10-year follow-up after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: outcomes in a monocentric series. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14:1480–1487.
Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004 Oct 13;292:1724–1737.
Fort JM, Vilallonga R, Lecube A, et al. Bariatric surgery outcomes in a European Centre of Excellence (CoE). Obes Surg. 2013;23:1324–1332.
Balibrea JM, Vilallonga R, Hidalgo M, et al. Mid-term results and responsiveness predictors after two-step single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2017;27:1302–1308.
Vilallonga R, Fort JM, Caubet E, et al. Robotic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a comparative study with 200 patients. Obes Surg. 2013;23:1501–1507.
Brethauer SA, Kim J, El Chaar M, et al. ASMBS Clinical Issues Committee. Standardized outcomes reporting in metabolic and bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2015;25:587–606.
Ma P, Reddy S, Higa KD. Revisional bariatric/metabolic surgery: what dictates its indications? Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2016;18:42.
Brolin RE, Kenler HA, Gorman RC, et al. The dilemma of outcome assessment after operations for morbid obesity. Surgery. 1989;105:337–346.
Halverson JD, Koehler RE. Gastric bypass: analysis of weight loss and factors determining success. Surgery. 1981;90:446–455.
Reinhold RB. Critical analysis of long-term weight loss following gastric bypass. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1982;155:385–394.
Christou NV, Look D, Maclean LD. Weight gain after short- and long-limb gastric bypass in patients followed for longer than 10 years. Ann Surg. 2006;244:734–740.
Livhits M, Mercado C, Yermilov I, et al. Preoperative predictors of weight loss following bariatric surgery: systematic review. Obes Surg. 2012;22:70–89.
Santos RS, Corcelles R, Puy RV, et al. Prognostic factors of weight loss after sleeve gastrectomy: multi centre study in Spain and Portugal. Cir Esp. 2017;95:135–142.
Hariri K, Guevara D, Dong M, et al. Is bariatric surgery effective for co-morbidity resolution in the super-obese patients? Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14:1261–1268.
Manning S, Pucci A, Carter NC, et al. Early postoperative weight loss predicts maximal weight loss after sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:1484–1491.
Cooper TC, Simmons EB, Webb K, et al. Trends in weight regain following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2015;25:1474–1481.
Cottam A, Billing J, Cottam D, et al. Long-term success and failure with SG is predictable by 3 months: a multivariate model using simple office markers. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13:1266–1270.
Benoit SC, Hunter TD, Francis DM, et al. Use of bariatric outcomes longitudinal database (BOLD) to study variability in patient success after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2014;24:936–943.
Hutcheon DA, Byham-Gray LD, Marcus AF, et al. Predictors of preoperative weight loss achievement in adult bariatric surgery candidates while following a low-calorie diet for 4 weeks. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13:1041–1051.
Al-Khyatt W, Ryall R, Leeder P, et al. Predictors of inadequate weight loss after laparoscopic gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2017;27:1446–1452.
de Raaff CA, Coblijn UK, de Vries N, et al. Predictive factors for insufficient weight loss after bariatric surgery: does obstructive sleep apnea influence weight loss? Obes Surg. 2016;26:1048–1056.
Thereaux J, Czernichow S, Corigliano N, et al. Five-year outcomes of gastric bypass for super-super-obesity (BMI≥60 kg/m2): a case matched study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11:32–37.
Singla V, Aggarwal S, Singh B, et al. Outcomes in super obese patients undergoing one anastomosis gastric bypass or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2019;29:1242–1247.