The role of the inferior parietal lobule in writer's cramp.
Adult
Brain
/ physiopathology
Brain Mapping
/ methods
Dystonic Disorders
/ diagnostic imaging
Evoked Potentials, Motor
/ physiology
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Motor Cortex
/ physiopathology
Neuronal Plasticity
/ physiology
Parietal Lobe
/ metabolism
Psychomotor Performance
/ physiology
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
/ methods
cortical silent period
fine motor control
parietal lobe
task-specific dystonia
writer’s cramp
Journal
Brain : a journal of neurology
ISSN: 1460-2156
Titre abrégé: Brain
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372537
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 06 2020
01 06 2020
Historique:
received:
28
11
2019
revised:
01
03
2020
accepted:
09
03
2020
pubmed:
20
5
2020
medline:
20
1
2021
entrez:
20
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Humans have a distinguishing ability for fine motor control that is subserved by a highly evolved cortico-motor neuronal network. The acquisition of a particular motor skill involves a long series of practice movements, trial and error, adjustment and refinement. At the cortical level, this acquisition begins in the parieto-temporal sensory regions and is subsequently consolidated and stratified in the premotor-motor cortex. Task-specific dystonia can be viewed as a corruption or loss of motor control confined to a single motor skill. Using a multimodal experimental approach combining neuroimaging and non-invasive brain stimulation, we explored interactions between the principal nodes of the fine motor control network in patients with writer's cramp and healthy matched controls. Patients and healthy volunteers underwent clinical assessment, diffusion-weighted MRI for tractography, and functional MRI during a finger tapping task. Activation maps from the task-functional MRI scans were used for target selection and neuro-navigation of the transcranial magnetic stimulation. Single- and double-pulse TMS evaluation included measurement of the input-output recruitment curve, cortical silent period, and amplitude of the motor evoked potentials conditioned by cortico-cortical interactions between premotor ventral (PMv)-motor cortex (M1), anterior inferior parietal lobule (aIPL)-M1, and dorsal inferior parietal lobule (dIPL)-M1 before and after inducing a long term depression-like plastic change to dIPL node with continuous theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation in a randomized, sham-controlled design. Baseline dIPL-M1 and aIPL-M1 cortico-cortical interactions were facilitatory and inhibitory, respectively, in healthy volunteers, whereas the interactions were converse and significantly different in writer's cramp. Baseline PMv-M1 interactions were inhibitory and similar between the groups. The dIPL-PMv resting state functional connectivity was increased in patients compared to controls, but no differences in structural connectivity between the nodes were observed. Cortical silent period was significantly prolonged in writer's cramp. Making a long term depression-like plastic change to dIPL node transformed the aIPL-M1 interaction to inhibitory (similar to healthy volunteers) and cancelled the PMv-M1 inhibition only in the writer's cramp group. These findings suggest that the parietal multimodal sensory association region could have an aberrant downstream influence on the fine motor control network in writer's cramp, which could be artificially restored to its normal function.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32428227
pii: 5840768
doi: 10.1093/brain/awaa138
pmc: PMC7296854
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Intramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1766-1779Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) (2020). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
Brain. 2005 Jan;128(Pt 1):104-15
pubmed: 15483042
Eur J Neurosci. 2008 Oct;28(8):1569-88
pubmed: 18691325
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2018 May;89(5):488-492
pubmed: 29089396
Neurobiol Dis. 2011 May;42(2):177-84
pubmed: 20817092
Neurobiol Dis. 2010 Mar;37(3):558-73
pubmed: 20005952
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Apr;49(5):1128-1135
pubmed: 21219917
Neuron. 2001 Jan;29(1):287-96
pubmed: 11182099
Cerebellum. 2017 Apr;16(2):577-594
pubmed: 27734238
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2009;27(1):55-65
pubmed: 19164853
Neurosci Res. 2020 Apr;153:27-39
pubmed: 30940459
J Neurophysiol. 2012 Jun;107(11):3190-9
pubmed: 22442568
Neuroimage. 2006 Jul 15;31(4):1453-74
pubmed: 16571375
Mov Disord. 2019 Apr;34(4):555-563
pubmed: 30840778
Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 15;62(2):768-73
pubmed: 21945692
Front Integr Neurosci. 2017 Dec 15;11:35
pubmed: 29326563
Cereb Cortex. 2017 Feb 1;27(2):1203-1215
pubmed: 26679193
J Physiol. 2008 Jun 1;586(11):2735-42
pubmed: 18403420
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2005 Dec;15(6):623-5
pubmed: 16271463
Brain Stimul. 2013 May;6(3):384-9
pubmed: 22939165
Eur J Neurosci. 2012 Feb;35(3):478-85
pubmed: 22288483
J Neurosci. 2004 Feb 4;24(5):1200-11
pubmed: 14762138
Cereb Cortex. 2013 Mar;23(3):615-28
pubmed: 22375016
Neurology. 2000 Jan 11;54(1):130-5
pubmed: 10636138
Exp Brain Res. 2000 Jan;130(1):48-59
pubmed: 10638440
Epileptic Disord. 2000 Sep;2(3):137-40
pubmed: 11022138
Brain Behav. 2017 Mar 08;7(4):e00640
pubmed: 28413699
J Neurophysiol. 2003 Aug;90(2):832-42
pubmed: 12904495
Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8
pubmed: 18839484
Neuron. 2005 Jan 20;45(2):201-6
pubmed: 15664172
Clin Neurophysiol. 2016 Jan;127(1):732-739
pubmed: 26024981
J Neurosci. 2008 Jun 4;28(23):5944-53
pubmed: 18524898
Brain Connect. 2013;3(5):523-35
pubmed: 23980912
Mov Disord. 2013 Jun 15;28(7):958-67
pubmed: 23893452
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Jan;35(1):340-52
pubmed: 22987751
Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Sep;120(9):1724-31
pubmed: 19683960
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Jul 09;9:385
pubmed: 26217209
Brain. 2013 Jul;136(Pt 7):2050-62
pubmed: 23801734
Neurology. 2019 Apr 16;92(16):e1843-e1851
pubmed: 30918091
J Neurophysiol. 1998 Feb;79(2):1092-7
pubmed: 9463464
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 1999;51:265-75
pubmed: 10590959
Exp Brain Res. 1996 Jun;109(3):467-72
pubmed: 8817277
Neurology. 1985 Jan;35(1):73-7
pubmed: 3966004
Nat Rev Neurol. 2018 Feb;14(2):116-124
pubmed: 29104291
J Neurosci Methods. 2008 Mar 30;169(1):231-8
pubmed: 18243329
Neurology. 1997 Oct;49(4):1054-9
pubmed: 9339689
Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 Dec;37(12):4363-4375
pubmed: 27466043
Elife. 2016 Jul 26;5:
pubmed: 27458796
Cereb Cortex. 2010 Jun;20(6):1372-85
pubmed: 19805419
Neuron. 2001 Sep 27;31(6):889-901
pubmed: 11580891
J Neurophysiol. 2012 Sep;108(6):1607-19
pubmed: 22745465
Brain Struct Funct. 2018 May;223(4):1713-1729
pubmed: 29196811
Front Neurol. 2017 May 03;8:170
pubmed: 28515706
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016 Sep;87(9):968-74
pubmed: 26818730
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2008;31:195-218
pubmed: 18558853
Brain. 2015 Jun;138(Pt 6):e356
pubmed: 25395099
Brain. 1994 Apr;117 ( Pt 2):317-23
pubmed: 8186958
Neurology. 2002 Apr 9;58(7):1135; author reply 1135
pubmed: 11940718
Exp Physiol. 2008 Jul;93(7):798-802
pubmed: 18562475
Neural Netw. 1998 Oct;11(7-8):1277-1303
pubmed: 12662750
Mov Disord. 2013 Jun 15;28(7):863-73
pubmed: 23649720
Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Apr;21(2):63
pubmed: 21613871
Front Neurosci. 2017 Mar 07;11:88
pubmed: 28326007