Introduction to Metamodeling for Reducing Computational Burden of Advanced Analyses with Health Economic Models: A Structured Overview of Metamodeling Methods in a 6-Step Application Process.
computational burden
emulators
metamodeling
simulation
surrogate models
Journal
Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making
ISSN: 1552-681X
Titre abrégé: Med Decis Making
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8109073
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2020
04 2020
Historique:
entrez:
20
5
2020
pubmed:
20
5
2020
medline:
24
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Metamodels can be used to reduce the computational burden associated with computationally demanding analyses of simulation models, although applications within health economics are still scarce. Besides a lack of awareness of their potential within health economics, the absence of guidance on the conceivably complex and time-consuming process of developing and validating metamodels may contribute to their limited uptake. To address these issues, this article introduces metamodeling to the wider health economic audience and presents a process for applying metamodeling in this context, including suitable methods and directions for their selection and use. General (i.e., non-health economic specific) metamodeling literature, clinical prediction modeling literature, and a previously published literature review were exploited to consolidate a process and to identify candidate metamodeling methods. Methods were considered applicable to health economics if they are able to account for mixed (i.e., continuous and discrete) input parameters and continuous outcomes. Six steps were identified as relevant for applying metamodeling methods within health economics: 1) the identification of a suitable metamodeling technique, 2) simulation of data sets according to a design of experiments, 3) fitting of the metamodel, 4) assessment of metamodel performance, 5) conducting the required analysis using the metamodel, and 6) verification of the results. Different methods are discussed to support each step, including their characteristics, directions for use, key references, and relevant R and Python packages. To address challenges regarding metamodeling methods selection, a first guide was developed toward using metamodels to reduce the computational burden of analyses of health economic models. This guidance may increase applications of metamodeling in health economics, enabling increased use of state-of-the-art analyses (e.g., value of information analysis) with computationally burdensome simulation models.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32428428
doi: 10.1177/0272989X20912233
pmc: PMC7754830
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
348-363Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : G0601721
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
Med Decis Making. 2014 Apr;34(3):327-42
pubmed: 24449434
Stat Methods Med Res. 1995 Sep;4(3):187-96
pubmed: 8548102
Value Health. 2017 Mar;20(3):310-319
pubmed: 28292475
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 9;12(11):e0183499
pubmed: 29121058
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 27;12(1):e0170803
pubmed: 28129365
Artif Intell Med. 2018 Jan;84:23-33
pubmed: 29054572
Med Decis Making. 1992 Jul-Sep;12(3):189-96
pubmed: 1513209
J Contam Hydrol. 2017 Aug;203:1-8
pubmed: 28583424
Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 Jun;32(6):547-58
pubmed: 24627341
Med Decis Making. 2013 Oct;33(7):880-90
pubmed: 23811758
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Jun;8(27):iii, 1-78
pubmed: 15215017
Med Decis Making. 2019 May;39(4):405-413
pubmed: 31179833
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2019 Apr;19(2):181-187
pubmed: 30426801
Med Decis Making. 2017 Oct;37(7):747-758
pubmed: 28410564
Med Decis Making. 2015 Jul;35(5):570-83
pubmed: 25810269
Med Decis Making. 2012 Sep-Oct;32(5):722-32
pubmed: 22990087
Med Decis Making. 2012 Sep-Oct;32(5):701-11
pubmed: 22990085
PLoS Comput Biol. 2014 Apr 17;10(4):e1003563
pubmed: 24743387
Health Econ. 2006 Dec;15(12):1295-310
pubmed: 16941543
Health Serv Res. 2013 Aug;48(4):1508-25
pubmed: 23402573
Biomed Eng Online. 2016 Dec 28;15(Suppl 2):148
pubmed: 28155700
Med Decis Making. 2014 Apr;34(3):311-26
pubmed: 24246566
Value Health. 2008 Mar-Apr;11(2):240-50
pubmed: 18380636