Antitumor activity of Z-endoxifen in aromatase inhibitor-sensitive and aromatase inhibitor-resistant estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.


Journal

Breast cancer research : BCR
ISSN: 1465-542X
Titre abrégé: Breast Cancer Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100927353

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 05 2020
Historique:
received: 02 09 2019
accepted: 03 05 2020
entrez: 21 5 2020
pubmed: 21 5 2020
medline: 6 11 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The tamoxifen metabolite, Z-endoxifen, demonstrated promising antitumor activity in endocrine-resistant estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer. We compared the antitumor activity of Z-endoxifen with tamoxifen and letrozole in the letrozole-sensitive MCF7 aromatase expressing model (MCF7AC1), as well as with tamoxifen, fulvestrant, exemestane, and exemestane plus everolimus in a letrozole-resistant MCF7 model (MCF7LR). MCF7AC1 tumor-bearing mice were randomized to control (no drug), letrozole (10 μg/day), tamoxifen (500 μg/day), or Z-endoxifen (25 and 75 mg/kg). Treatment in the letrozole arm was continued until resistance developed. MCF7LR tumor-bearing mice were then randomized to Z-endoxifen (50 mg/kg) or tamoxifen for 4 weeks and tumors harvested for microarray and immunohistochemistry analysis. The antitumor activity of Z-endoxifen in the MCF7LR tumors was further compared in a second in vivo study with exemestane, exemestane plus everolimus, and fulvestrant. In the MCF7AC1 tumors, both Z-endoxifen doses were significantly superior to control and tamoxifen in reducing tumor volumes at 4 weeks. Additionally, the 75 mg/kg Z-endoxifen dose was additionally superior to letrozole. Prolonged letrozole exposure resulted in resistance at 25 weeks. In MCF7LR tumor-bearing mice, Z-endoxifen significantly reduced tumor volumes compared to tamoxifen, letrozole, and exemestane, with no significant differences compared to exemestane plus everolimus and fulvestrant. Additionally, compared to tamoxifen, Z-endoxifen markedly inhibited ERα target genes, Ki67 and Akt expression in vivo. In endocrine-sensitive and letrozole-resistant breast tumors, Z-endoxifen results in robust antitumor and antiestrogenic activity compared to tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitor monotherapy. These data support the ongoing development of Z-endoxifen.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The tamoxifen metabolite, Z-endoxifen, demonstrated promising antitumor activity in endocrine-resistant estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer. We compared the antitumor activity of Z-endoxifen with tamoxifen and letrozole in the letrozole-sensitive MCF7 aromatase expressing model (MCF7AC1), as well as with tamoxifen, fulvestrant, exemestane, and exemestane plus everolimus in a letrozole-resistant MCF7 model (MCF7LR).
METHODS
MCF7AC1 tumor-bearing mice were randomized to control (no drug), letrozole (10 μg/day), tamoxifen (500 μg/day), or Z-endoxifen (25 and 75 mg/kg). Treatment in the letrozole arm was continued until resistance developed. MCF7LR tumor-bearing mice were then randomized to Z-endoxifen (50 mg/kg) or tamoxifen for 4 weeks and tumors harvested for microarray and immunohistochemistry analysis. The antitumor activity of Z-endoxifen in the MCF7LR tumors was further compared in a second in vivo study with exemestane, exemestane plus everolimus, and fulvestrant.
RESULTS
In the MCF7AC1 tumors, both Z-endoxifen doses were significantly superior to control and tamoxifen in reducing tumor volumes at 4 weeks. Additionally, the 75 mg/kg Z-endoxifen dose was additionally superior to letrozole. Prolonged letrozole exposure resulted in resistance at 25 weeks. In MCF7LR tumor-bearing mice, Z-endoxifen significantly reduced tumor volumes compared to tamoxifen, letrozole, and exemestane, with no significant differences compared to exemestane plus everolimus and fulvestrant. Additionally, compared to tamoxifen, Z-endoxifen markedly inhibited ERα target genes, Ki67 and Akt expression in vivo.
CONCLUSION
In endocrine-sensitive and letrozole-resistant breast tumors, Z-endoxifen results in robust antitumor and antiestrogenic activity compared to tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitor monotherapy. These data support the ongoing development of Z-endoxifen.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32430040
doi: 10.1186/s13058-020-01286-7
pii: 10.1186/s13058-020-01286-7
pmc: PMC7238733
doi:

Substances chimiques

Aromatase Inhibitors 0
Receptors, Estrogen 0
Tamoxifen 094ZI81Y45
4-hydroxy-N-desmethyltamoxifen 46AF8680RC
Letrozole 7LKK855W8I

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

51

Subventions

Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P50 CA116201
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA133049
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 AR068275
Pays : United States

Références

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2004 May;85(2):151-9
pubmed: 15111773
Cancer Res. 1994 Oct 1;54(19):5092-5
pubmed: 7923123
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 May;139(1):61-9
pubmed: 23605084
Cancer Res. 2008 May 1;68(9):3516-22
pubmed: 18451180
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2005 May;55(5):471-8
pubmed: 15685451
Exp Cell Res. 2005 Jan 1;302(1):96-107
pubmed: 15541729
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Jan 5;97(1):30-9
pubmed: 15632378
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Oct 25;102(43):15545-50
pubmed: 16199517
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Dec 3;95(23):1758-64
pubmed: 14652237
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Oct 20;35(30):3391-3400
pubmed: 28854070
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Mar 17;96(6):456-65
pubmed: 15026471
Cancer Res. 2009 Mar 1;69(5):1722-7
pubmed: 19244106
PLoS One. 2014 May 22;9(5):e98219
pubmed: 24853369
World J Clin Oncol. 2016 Oct 10;7(5):352-369
pubmed: 27777878
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Jul;80(1):61-74
pubmed: 16815318
Endocr Relat Cancer. 2006 Dec;13(4):1121-33
pubmed: 17158758
Endocr Rev. 2013 Feb;34(1):1-32
pubmed: 22947396
Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2016 Dec;35(4):515-524
pubmed: 27896521
Cancer Res. 2015 Nov 15;75(22):4830-8
pubmed: 26527289
BMC Bioinformatics. 2013 Jan 16;14:7
pubmed: 23323831
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2014 Dec;74(6):1271-8
pubmed: 25318936

Auteurs

Swaathi Jayaraman (S)

Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Xiaonan Hou (X)

Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Mary J Kuffel (MJ)

Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Vera J Suman (VJ)

Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Tanya L Hoskin (TL)

Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Kathryn E Reinicke (KE)

Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

David G Monroe (DG)

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Krishna R Kalari (KR)

Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Xiaojia Tang (X)

Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Megan A Zeldenrust (MA)

Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Jingfei Cheng (J)

Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Elizabeth S Bruinsma (ES)

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Sarah A Buhrow (SA)

Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Renee M McGovern (RM)

Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Stephanie L Safgren (SL)

Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Chad A Walden (CA)

Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Jodi M Carter (JM)

Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Joel M Reid (JM)

Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

James N Ingle (JN)

Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Matthew M Ames (MM)

Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

John R Hawse (JR)

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Matthew P Goetz (MP)

Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Goetz.Matthew@mayo.edu.
Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Goetz.Matthew@mayo.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH