Patients' perceptions of 70-gene signature testing: commonly changing the initial inclination to undergo or forego chemotherapy and reducing decisional conflict.


Journal

Breast cancer research and treatment
ISSN: 1573-7217
Titre abrégé: Breast Cancer Res Treat
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8111104

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2020
Historique:
received: 13 03 2020
accepted: 11 05 2020
pubmed: 21 5 2020
medline: 5 1 2021
entrez: 21 5 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Little is known about the impact of 70-gene signature (70-GS) use on patients' chemotherapy decision-making. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of 70-GS use on patients' decisions to undergo chemotherapy. The perceived decision conflict during decision-making was a secondary objective of the study. Patients operated for estrogen receptor positive early breast cancer were asked to fill out a questionnaire probing their inclination to undergo chemotherapy before deployment of the 70-GS test. After disclosure of the 70-GS result patients were asked about their decision regarding chemotherapy. Patients' decisional conflict was measured using the 16-item decisional conflict scale (DCS); scores < 25 are associated with a persuaded decision while a score > 37.5 implies that one feels unsure about a choice. Between January 1th 2017 and December 31th 2018, 106 patients completed both questionnaires. Before deployment of the 70-GS, 58% of patients (n = 62) formulated a clear treatment preference, of whom 21 patients (34%) changed their opinion on treatment with chemotherapy following the 70-GS. The final decision regarding chemotherapy was in line with the 70-GS result in 90% of patients. The percentage of patients who felt unsure about their preference to be treated with chemotherapy decreased from 42 to 5% after disclosure of the 70-GS. The mean total DCS significantly decreased from pre-test to post-test from 35 to 23, irrespective of the risk estimate (p < 0.001). Deployment of the 70-GS changed patients' inclination to undergo adjuvant chemotherapy in one third of patients and decreased patients' decisional conflict.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32430679
doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05683-6
pii: 10.1007/s10549-020-05683-6
pmc: PMC7275022
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biomarkers, Tumor 0
Receptors, Estrogen 0
ERBB2 protein, human EC 2.7.10.1
Receptor, ErbB-2 EC 2.7.10.1

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

107-115

Références

Curr Med Res Opin. 2016 Jul;32(7):1217-24
pubmed: 26971372
Med Decis Making. 1995 Jan-Mar;15(1):25-30
pubmed: 7898294
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Aug 10;24(23):3726-34
pubmed: 16720680
Lancet. 2005 May 14-20;365(9472):1687-717
pubmed: 15894097
N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 25;375(8):717-29
pubmed: 27557300
J Clin Oncol. 2001 Feb 15;19(4):980-91
pubmed: 11181660
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jul 12;379(2):111-121
pubmed: 29860917
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 19;373(21):2005-14
pubmed: 26412349
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Aug 20;35(24):2814-2819
pubmed: 28813638
Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 2007 May-Jun;4(3):147-55
pubmed: 17878518
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 May 1;110(5):493-500
pubmed: 29237009
Br J Cancer. 2012 Aug 21;107(5):800-7
pubmed: 22850554
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr 1;34(10):1065-71
pubmed: 26598746
Breast. 2014 Aug;23(4):423-8
pubmed: 24685596
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Oct;26(11):3495-3501
pubmed: 31209664
Br J Cancer. 2016 Mar 29;114(7):731-6
pubmed: 26954715
Eur J Cancer. 2016 Jul;61:85-93
pubmed: 27155447
Oncologist. 2015 Apr;20(4):351-6
pubmed: 25746345
Ann Oncol. 2017 Aug 1;28(8):1700-1712
pubmed: 28838210
J Behav Med. 2013 Dec;36(6):567-73
pubmed: 22878783
Curr Oncol. 2014 Apr;21(2):e203-11
pubmed: 24764705
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2002 Nov 9;146(45):2144-51
pubmed: 12474555
Curr Med Res Opin. 2015 Jun;31(6):1129-37
pubmed: 25851308
N Engl J Med. 2002 Dec 19;347(25):1999-2009
pubmed: 12490681
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Apr 1;28(10):1671-6
pubmed: 20065191
BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 02;6(6):e010981
pubmed: 27256091
Br J Cancer. 2014 Aug 26;111(5):837-42
pubmed: 25003667
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Aug;141(1):13-22
pubmed: 23974828
Psychooncology. 2018 Apr;27(4):1264-1269
pubmed: 29448311

Auteurs

Julia E C van Steenhoven (JEC)

Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. jvsteenhoven@diakhuis.nl.
Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. jvsteenhoven@diakhuis.nl.

Bianca M den Dekker (BM)

Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Anne Kuijer (A)

Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.

Paul J van Diest (PJ)

Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Peter Nieboer (P)

Department of Medical Oncology, Wilhelmina Hospital Assen, Assen, The Netherlands.

Johanna M Zuetenhorst (JM)

Department of Medical Oncology, Franciscus Gasthuis Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Alex L Th Imholz (ALT)

Department of Medical Oncology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands.

Sabine Siesling (S)

Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.

Thijs van Dalen (T)

Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH