Patients' perceptions of 70-gene signature testing: commonly changing the initial inclination to undergo or forego chemotherapy and reducing decisional conflict.
Adult
Aged
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ therapeutic use
Biomarkers, Tumor
/ genetics
Breast Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
Choice Behavior
Conflict, Psychological
Decision Making
Decision Support Techniques
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Gene Expression Profiling
Humans
Middle Aged
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
/ psychology
Perception
Prognosis
Prospective Studies
Receptor, ErbB-2
/ metabolism
Receptors, Estrogen
/ metabolism
Surveys and Questionnaires
Breast cancer
Chemotherapy
Decision-making
Decisional conflict
Gene-expression profiling
Journal
Breast cancer research and treatment
ISSN: 1573-7217
Titre abrégé: Breast Cancer Res Treat
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8111104
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2020
Jul 2020
Historique:
received:
13
03
2020
accepted:
11
05
2020
pubmed:
21
5
2020
medline:
5
1
2021
entrez:
21
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Little is known about the impact of 70-gene signature (70-GS) use on patients' chemotherapy decision-making. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of 70-GS use on patients' decisions to undergo chemotherapy. The perceived decision conflict during decision-making was a secondary objective of the study. Patients operated for estrogen receptor positive early breast cancer were asked to fill out a questionnaire probing their inclination to undergo chemotherapy before deployment of the 70-GS test. After disclosure of the 70-GS result patients were asked about their decision regarding chemotherapy. Patients' decisional conflict was measured using the 16-item decisional conflict scale (DCS); scores < 25 are associated with a persuaded decision while a score > 37.5 implies that one feels unsure about a choice. Between January 1th 2017 and December 31th 2018, 106 patients completed both questionnaires. Before deployment of the 70-GS, 58% of patients (n = 62) formulated a clear treatment preference, of whom 21 patients (34%) changed their opinion on treatment with chemotherapy following the 70-GS. The final decision regarding chemotherapy was in line with the 70-GS result in 90% of patients. The percentage of patients who felt unsure about their preference to be treated with chemotherapy decreased from 42 to 5% after disclosure of the 70-GS. The mean total DCS significantly decreased from pre-test to post-test from 35 to 23, irrespective of the risk estimate (p < 0.001). Deployment of the 70-GS changed patients' inclination to undergo adjuvant chemotherapy in one third of patients and decreased patients' decisional conflict.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32430679
doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05683-6
pii: 10.1007/s10549-020-05683-6
pmc: PMC7275022
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
Receptors, Estrogen
0
ERBB2 protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
Receptor, ErbB-2
EC 2.7.10.1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
107-115Références
Curr Med Res Opin. 2016 Jul;32(7):1217-24
pubmed: 26971372
Med Decis Making. 1995 Jan-Mar;15(1):25-30
pubmed: 7898294
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Aug 10;24(23):3726-34
pubmed: 16720680
Lancet. 2005 May 14-20;365(9472):1687-717
pubmed: 15894097
N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 25;375(8):717-29
pubmed: 27557300
J Clin Oncol. 2001 Feb 15;19(4):980-91
pubmed: 11181660
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jul 12;379(2):111-121
pubmed: 29860917
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 19;373(21):2005-14
pubmed: 26412349
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Aug 20;35(24):2814-2819
pubmed: 28813638
Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 2007 May-Jun;4(3):147-55
pubmed: 17878518
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 May 1;110(5):493-500
pubmed: 29237009
Br J Cancer. 2012 Aug 21;107(5):800-7
pubmed: 22850554
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr 1;34(10):1065-71
pubmed: 26598746
Breast. 2014 Aug;23(4):423-8
pubmed: 24685596
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Oct;26(11):3495-3501
pubmed: 31209664
Br J Cancer. 2016 Mar 29;114(7):731-6
pubmed: 26954715
Eur J Cancer. 2016 Jul;61:85-93
pubmed: 27155447
Oncologist. 2015 Apr;20(4):351-6
pubmed: 25746345
Ann Oncol. 2017 Aug 1;28(8):1700-1712
pubmed: 28838210
J Behav Med. 2013 Dec;36(6):567-73
pubmed: 22878783
Curr Oncol. 2014 Apr;21(2):e203-11
pubmed: 24764705
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2002 Nov 9;146(45):2144-51
pubmed: 12474555
Curr Med Res Opin. 2015 Jun;31(6):1129-37
pubmed: 25851308
N Engl J Med. 2002 Dec 19;347(25):1999-2009
pubmed: 12490681
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Apr 1;28(10):1671-6
pubmed: 20065191
BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 02;6(6):e010981
pubmed: 27256091
Br J Cancer. 2014 Aug 26;111(5):837-42
pubmed: 25003667
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Aug;141(1):13-22
pubmed: 23974828
Psychooncology. 2018 Apr;27(4):1264-1269
pubmed: 29448311