Back pain, ankylosing spondylitis and social media usage; a descriptive analysis of current activity.
Ankylosing spondylitis
Back pain
Exercise
Internet
Social media
Journal
Rheumatology international
ISSN: 1437-160X
Titre abrégé: Rheumatol Int
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8206885
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Sep 2020
Historique:
received:
02
03
2020
accepted:
04
05
2020
pubmed:
21
5
2020
medline:
8
5
2021
entrez:
21
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Social media usage by back pain patients is a new and developing area. Analysing patterns of this online activity offers a new way to understand our patients' concerns and behaviour around disease. Large volume data can be evaluated on a scale not feasible through alternative methods. A cross sectional review of specific terms relating to 'back pain' (BP) and 'ankylosing spondylitis' (AS) were tracked internationally on popular websites, blogs and boards over two 3 month periods, in 2016 and 2019. Relevant co-terms were also tracked in these discussions, such as 'exercise', 'medication' and 'doctor'. The size of the current online BP conversation is significant; there were over 100,000 mentions/month across each study period, particularly 'low-' BP. Discussions about AS increased threefold between 2016 and 2019. More discussions took place online at the start of the week, and in the afternoons. Pregnancy, baby and mens' health resources were the most popular sites for BP chats. People posting about AS were mainly female (80%) and predominantly had an established diagnosis, with health forums hosting more of these discussions than for BP. Exercise was more commonly mentioned in the context of BP, whereas medications were more common in the AS conversations. Analysing online discussions about BP and AS helps to identify themes amongst patients. Some are seeking a diagnosis, support, or treatment information. Understanding the massive scale of online conversations could help clinicians adopt targeted approaches to increase patient identification, meet patient concerns better, and optimise engagement.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32430806
doi: 10.1007/s00296-020-04600-w
pii: 10.1007/s00296-020-04600-w
pmc: PMC7371655
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1493-1499Références
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Mar;84(3):382-3
pubmed: 12638106
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 22;17(6):e156
pubmed: 26099325
J Rheumatol. 2010 Apr;37(4):835-41
pubmed: 20194443
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Mar-Apr;28(2):361-8
pubmed: 19275991
Br J Rheumatol. 1995 Nov;34(11):1074-7
pubmed: 8542211
J Rheumatol. 1998 Nov;25(11):2156-60
pubmed: 9818658
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014 Apr;53(4):650-7
pubmed: 24324212
Clin Rheumatol. 2008 Apr;27(4):457-62
pubmed: 17899306
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Sep;96(3):320-6
pubmed: 24923652
Ann Rheum Dis. 2006 Apr;65(4):442-52
pubmed: 16126791
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 26;16:442
pubmed: 27562728