Hernia incidence following a randomized clinical trial of single-incision versus multi-port laparoscopic colectomy.

Colon cancer Incisional hernia Randomized clinical trial Single incision laparoscopic surgery Single port surgery

Journal

Surgical endoscopy
ISSN: 1432-2218
Titre abrégé: Surg Endosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8806653

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2021
Historique:
received: 25 12 2019
accepted: 15 05 2020
pubmed: 22 5 2020
medline: 30 9 2021
entrez: 22 5 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The short-term results of single-incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC) showed the safety, feasibility, and effectiveness when performed by skilled laparoscopic surgeons. However, the long-term complications, such as SILC-associated incisional hernia, have not been evaluated. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of incisional hernia after SILC compared with multi-port laparoscopic colectomy (MPC) for colon cancer. From March 2012, to March 2015, a total of 200 patients were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomized to the MPC arm and SILC arm. A total of 200 patients (MPC arm; 100 patients, SILC arm; 100 patients) were therefore analyzed. In all cases the specimen was extracted through the umbilical port, which was extended according to the size of the specimen. A diagnosis of incisional hernia was made either based on a physical examination or computed tomography. The baseline factors were well balanced between the arms. The median follow-up period was 42.4 (range 9.4-70.0) months. Twenty-one patients were diagnosed with incisional hernia, giving an incidence rate of 12.1% in the MPC arm and 9.0% in the SILC arm at 36 months (P = 0.451). In the multivariate analysis, the body mass index (≥ 25 kg/m We found no significant difference in the incidence of incisional hernia after SILC arm versus MPC arm with a long-term follow-up. However, this result may be biased because all specimens were harvested through the umbilical port. The study was registered with the Japanese Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000007220.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The short-term results of single-incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC) showed the safety, feasibility, and effectiveness when performed by skilled laparoscopic surgeons. However, the long-term complications, such as SILC-associated incisional hernia, have not been evaluated. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of incisional hernia after SILC compared with multi-port laparoscopic colectomy (MPC) for colon cancer.
METHODS
From March 2012, to March 2015, a total of 200 patients were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomized to the MPC arm and SILC arm. A total of 200 patients (MPC arm; 100 patients, SILC arm; 100 patients) were therefore analyzed. In all cases the specimen was extracted through the umbilical port, which was extended according to the size of the specimen. A diagnosis of incisional hernia was made either based on a physical examination or computed tomography.
RESULTS
The baseline factors were well balanced between the arms. The median follow-up period was 42.4 (range 9.4-70.0) months. Twenty-one patients were diagnosed with incisional hernia, giving an incidence rate of 12.1% in the MPC arm and 9.0% in the SILC arm at 36 months (P = 0.451). In the multivariate analysis, the body mass index (≥ 25 kg/m
CONCLUSIONS
We found no significant difference in the incidence of incisional hernia after SILC arm versus MPC arm with a long-term follow-up. However, this result may be biased because all specimens were harvested through the umbilical port. The study was registered with the Japanese Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000007220.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32435960
doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07656-8
pii: 10.1007/s00464-020-07656-8
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2465-2472

Références

Champagne BJ, Lee EC, Leblanc F, Stein SL, Delaney CP (2011) Single-incision vs straight laparoscopic segmental colectomy: a case-controlled study. Dis Colon Rectum 54:183–186
doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181fd48af
Chen WT, Chang SC, Chiang HC et al (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical results. Surg Endosc 25:1887–1892
doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1481-4
Kim SJ, Ryu GO, Choi BJ et al (2011) The short-term outcomes of conventional and single-port laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 254:933–940
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318237826b
Papaconstantinou HT, Thomas JS (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: assessment of oncologic resection and short-term outcomes in a case-matched comparison with standard laparoscopy. Surgery 150:820–827
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.07.060
Champagne BJ, Papaconstantinou HT, Parmar SS et al (2012) Single-incision versus standard multiport laparoscopic colectomy: a multicenter, case-controlled comparison. Ann Surg 255:66–69
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182378442
Lu CC, Lin SE, Chung KC, Rau KM (2012) Comparison of clinical outcome of single-incision laparoscopic surgery using a simplified access system with conventional laparoscopic surgery for malignant colorectal disease. Colorectal Dis 14:e171–e176
doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02825.x
Ramos-Valadez DI, Ragupathi M, Nieto J et al (2012) Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: a case-matched series. Surg Endosc 26:96–102
doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1833-8
Velthuis S, van den Boezem PB, Lips DJ, Prins HA, Cuesta MA, Sietses C (2012) Comparison of short-term surgical outcomes after single-incision laparoscopic versus multiport laparoscopic right colectomy: a two-center, prospective case-controlled study of 100 patients. Dig Surg 29:477–483
doi: 10.1159/000346044
Takemasa I, Uemura M, Nishimura J et al (2014) Feasibility of single-site laparoscopic colectomy with complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer: a prospective case-control comparison. Surg Endosc 28:1110–1118
doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3284-x
Katsuno G, Fukunaga M, Nagakari K, Yoshikawa S, Azuma D, Kohama S (2015) Short-term and long-term outcomes of single-incision versus multi-incision laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer: a propensity-score-matched analysis of 214 cases. Surg Endosc 30:1317–1325
doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4371-y
Kim CW, Cho MS, Baek SJ et al (2015) Oncologic outcomes of single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic anterior resection for sigmoid colon cancer: a propensity-score matching analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 22:924–930
doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4039-1
Suzuki O, Nakamura F, Kashimura N, Nakamura T, Takada M, Ambo Y (2015) A case-matched comparison of single-incision versus multiport laparoscopic right colectomy for colon cancer. Surg Today 46:297–302
doi: 10.1007/s00595-015-1154-y
Watanabe J, Ota M, Fujii S, Suwa H, Ishibe A, Endo I (2016) Randomized clinical trial of single-incision versus multiport laparoscopic colectomy. Br J Surg 103:1276–1281
doi: 10.1002/bjs.10212
Kang BM, Kim HJ, Kye BH et al (2018) Multicenter, randomized single-port versus multiport laparoscopic surgery (SIMPLE) trial in colon cancer: an interim analysis. Surg Endosc 32:1540–1549
doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5842-0
Maggiori L, Tuech JJ, Cotte E et al (2018) Single-incision laparoscopy versus multiport laparoscopy for colonic surgery: a multicenter, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 268:740–746
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002836
Yang TX, Chua TC (2013) Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy versus conventional multiport laparoscopic colectomy: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. Int J Colorectal Dis 28:89–101
doi: 10.1007/s00384-012-1537-0
Lujan JA, Soriano MT, Abrisqueta J, Perez D, Parrilla P (2015) Single-port colectomy VS multi-port laparoscopic colectomy. systematic review and meta-analysis of more than 2800 procedures. Cir Esp 93:307–319
doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2014.11.009
Hoyuela C, Juvany M, Carvajal F (2017) Single-incision laparoscopy versus standard laparoscopy for colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 214:127–140
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.03.002
Levic K, Bulut O (2018) Single-incision laparoscopy versus standard laparoscopy for colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 216:1233
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.01.018
Alptekin H, Yilmaz H, Acar F, Kafali ME, Sahin M (2012) Incisional hernia rate may increase after single-port cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 22:731–737
doi: 10.1089/lap.2012.0129
Marks JM, Phillips MS, Tacchino R et al (2013) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with improved cosmesis scoring at the cost of significantly higher hernia rates: 1-year results of a prospective randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial of traditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 216:1037–1047 discussion 47–48
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.02.024
Sangster W, Kulaylat AN, Stewart DB, Schubart JR, Koltun WA, Messaris E (2015) Hernia incidence following single-site vs standard laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 17:250–256
doi: 10.1111/codi.12797
Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C (2010) International Union against Cancer. TNM classification of malignant tumours, 7th edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, West Sussex, Hoboken
Antoniou SA, Garcia-Alamino JM, Hajibandeh S et al (2018) Single-incision surgery trocar-site hernia: an updated systematic review meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis by the Minimally Invasive Surgery Synthesis of Interventions Outcomes Network (MISSION). Surg Endosc 32:14–23
doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5717-4
Lee L, Mata J, Droeser RA et al (2018) Incisional hernia after midline versus transverse specimen extraction incision: a randomized trial in patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy. Ann Surg 268:41–47
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002615
Lee L, Abou-Khalil M, Liberman S, Boutros M, Fried GM, Feldman LS (2017) Incidence of incisional hernia in the specimen extraction site for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 31:5083–5093
doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5573-2
Flum DR, Horvath K, Koepsell T (2003) Have outcomes of incisional hernia repair improved with time? A population-based analysis. Ann Surg 237:129–135
doi: 10.1097/00000658-200301000-00018
Fink C, Baumann P, Wente MN et al (2014) Incisional hernia rate 3 years after midline laparotomy. Br J Surg 101:51–54
doi: 10.1002/bjs.9364
Soderback H, Gunnarsson U, Hellman P, Sandblom G (2018) Incisional hernia after surgery for colorectal cancer: a population-based register study. Int J Colorectal Dis 33:1411–1417
doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3124-5
Bartels SA, Vlug MS, Hollmann MW et al (2014) Small bowel obstruction, incisional hernia and survival after laparoscopic and open colonic resection (LAFA study). Br J Surg 101:1153–1159
doi: 10.1002/bjs.9585
Sadava EE, Kerman Cabo J, Carballo FH, Bun ME, Rotholtz NA (2014) Incisional hernia after laparoscopic colorectal surgery Is there any factor associated? Surg Endosc 28:3421–3424
doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3615-6
Jensen KK, Krarup PM, Scheike T, Jorgensen LN, Mynster T (2016) Incisional hernias after open versus laparoscopic surgery for colonic cancer: a nationwide cohort study. Surg Endosc 30:4469–4479
doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4779-z
Laurent C, Leblanc F, Bretagnol F, Capdepont M, Rullier E (2008) Long-term wound advantages of the laparoscopic approach in rectal cancer. Br J Surg 95:903–908
doi: 10.1002/bjs.6134
Aquina CT, Rickles AS, Probst CP et al (2015) Visceral obesity, not elevated BMI, is strongly associated with incisional hernia after colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 58:220–227
doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000261
Bellon JM, Bajo A, Ga-Honduvilla N et al (2001) Fibroblasts from the transversalis fascia of young patients with direct inguinal hernias show constitutive MMP-2 overexpression. Ann Surg 233:287–291
doi: 10.1097/00000658-200102000-00020
Fachinelli A, Maciel Trindade MR (2007) Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of total and types I and III collagens in patients with ventral hernias. Langenbecks Arch Surg 392:459–464
doi: 10.1007/s00423-006-0086-9
Zoller B, Ji J, Sundquist J, Sundquist K (2013) Shared and nonshared familial susceptibility to surgically treated inguinal hernia, femoral hernia, incisional hernia, epigastric hernia, and umbilical hernia. J Am Coll Surg 217:289–299
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.04.020

Auteurs

Jun Watanabe (J)

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9, Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan. nabe-jun@comet.ocn.ne.jp.
Department of Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan. nabe-jun@comet.ocn.ne.jp.

Atsushi Ishibe (A)

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9, Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan.

Yusuke Suwa (Y)

Department of Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.

Hirokazu Suwa (H)

Department of Surgery, Yokosuka Kyosai Hospital, Yokosuka, Japan.

Mitsuyoshi Ota (M)

Department of Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.

Kazumi Kubota (K)

Department of Biostatistics, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.

Takeharu Yamanaka (T)

Department of Biostatistics, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.

Chikara Kunisaki (C)

Department of Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.

Itaru Endo (I)

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9, Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH