Novel visualized quantitative epigenetic imprinted gene biomarkers diagnose the malignancy of ten cancer types.
Algorithms
Alleles
Biomarkers, Tumor
/ genetics
Chromogranins
/ genetics
Early Detection of Cancer
Female
GRB10 Adaptor Protein
/ genetics
GTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Gs
/ genetics
GTP-Binding Proteins
/ genetics
Gene Expression Profiling
/ methods
Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic
Genomic Imprinting
Humans
In Situ Hybridization
/ methods
Male
Neoplasms
/ diagnosis
Ribonucleoproteins, Small Nuclear
/ genetics
Sensitivity and Specificity
Biallelic expression
Cancer biomarker
Epigenetics
Genomic imprinting
Multiallelic expression
Journal
Clinical epigenetics
ISSN: 1868-7083
Titre abrégé: Clin Epigenetics
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101516977
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 05 2020
24 05 2020
Historique:
received:
31
01
2020
accepted:
12
05
2020
entrez:
26
5
2020
pubmed:
26
5
2020
medline:
4
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Epigenetic alterations are involved in most cancers, but its application in cancer diagnosis is still limited. More practical and intuitive methods to detect the aberrant expressions from clinical samples using highly sensitive biomarkers are needed. In this study, we developed a novel approach in identifying, visualizing, and quantifying the biallelic and multiallelic expressions of an imprinted gene panel associated with cancer status. We evaluated the normal and aberrant expressions measured using the imprinted gene panel to formulate diagnostic models which could accurately distinguish the imprinting differences of normal and benign cases from cancerous tissues for each of the ten cancer types. The Quantitative Chromogenic Imprinted Gene In Situ Hybridization (QCIGISH) method developed from a 1013-case study which provides a visual and quantitative analysis of non-coding RNA allelic expressions identified the guanine nucleotide-binding protein, alpha-stimulating complex locus (GNAS), growth factor receptor-bound protein (GRB10), and small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptide N (SNRPN) out of five tested imprinted genes as efficient epigenetic biomarkers for the early-stage detection of ten cancer types. A binary algorithm developed for cancer diagnosis showed that elevated biallelic expression (BAE), multiallelic expression (MAE), and total expression (TE) measurements for the imprinted gene panel were associated with cell carcinogenesis, with the formulated diagnostic models achieving consistently high sensitivities (91-98%) and specificities (86-98%) across the different cancer types. The QCIGISH method provides an innovative way to visually assess and quantitatively analyze individual cells for cancer potential extending from hyperplasia and dysplasia until carcinoma in situ and invasion, which effectively supplements standard clinical cytologic and histopathologic diagnosis for early cancer detection. In addition, the diagnostic models developed from the BAE, MAE, and TE measurements of the imprinted gene panel GNAS, GRB10, and SNRPN could provide important predictive information which are useful in early-stage cancer detection and personalized cancer management.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Epigenetic alterations are involved in most cancers, but its application in cancer diagnosis is still limited. More practical and intuitive methods to detect the aberrant expressions from clinical samples using highly sensitive biomarkers are needed. In this study, we developed a novel approach in identifying, visualizing, and quantifying the biallelic and multiallelic expressions of an imprinted gene panel associated with cancer status. We evaluated the normal and aberrant expressions measured using the imprinted gene panel to formulate diagnostic models which could accurately distinguish the imprinting differences of normal and benign cases from cancerous tissues for each of the ten cancer types.
RESULTS
The Quantitative Chromogenic Imprinted Gene In Situ Hybridization (QCIGISH) method developed from a 1013-case study which provides a visual and quantitative analysis of non-coding RNA allelic expressions identified the guanine nucleotide-binding protein, alpha-stimulating complex locus (GNAS), growth factor receptor-bound protein (GRB10), and small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptide N (SNRPN) out of five tested imprinted genes as efficient epigenetic biomarkers for the early-stage detection of ten cancer types. A binary algorithm developed for cancer diagnosis showed that elevated biallelic expression (BAE), multiallelic expression (MAE), and total expression (TE) measurements for the imprinted gene panel were associated with cell carcinogenesis, with the formulated diagnostic models achieving consistently high sensitivities (91-98%) and specificities (86-98%) across the different cancer types.
CONCLUSIONS
The QCIGISH method provides an innovative way to visually assess and quantitatively analyze individual cells for cancer potential extending from hyperplasia and dysplasia until carcinoma in situ and invasion, which effectively supplements standard clinical cytologic and histopathologic diagnosis for early cancer detection. In addition, the diagnostic models developed from the BAE, MAE, and TE measurements of the imprinted gene panel GNAS, GRB10, and SNRPN could provide important predictive information which are useful in early-stage cancer detection and personalized cancer management.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32448196
doi: 10.1186/s13148-020-00861-1
pii: 10.1186/s13148-020-00861-1
pmc: PMC7245932
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
Chromogranins
0
GRB10 protein, human
0
Ribonucleoproteins, Small Nuclear
0
GRB10 Adaptor Protein
151441-47-3
GNAS protein, human
EC 3.6.1.-
GTP-Binding Proteins
EC 3.6.1.-
GTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Gs
EC 3.6.5.1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
71Références
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1082:123-144
pubmed: 30357718
Bioinformatics. 2011 Nov 15;27(22):3209-10
pubmed: 21976420
Methods Mol Biol. 2001;181:169-80
pubmed: 12843449
Biochem J. 2017 Mar 7;474(6):885-896
pubmed: 28270561
J Pathol. 2007 Feb;211(3):261-8
pubmed: 17177177
Nat Med. 2019 Mar;25(3):517-525
pubmed: 30664780
J Transl Med. 2015 Apr 09;13:113
pubmed: 25884481
Epigenomics. 2014 Feb;6(1):73-88
pubmed: 24579948
Eur J Cancer. 2005 Mar;41(4):549-54
pubmed: 15737559
BMC Cancer. 2017 Oct 23;17(1):697
pubmed: 29061138
J Neurooncol. 2011 Feb;101(3):419-28
pubmed: 20582452
Int J Cancer. 2015 Aug 1;137(3):537-47
pubmed: 25560175
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2016 Dec;17(12):743-755
pubmed: 27580841
Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1543:221-229
pubmed: 28349430
Nat Commun. 2018 Feb 8;9(1):579
pubmed: 29422527
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2014 Feb 01;6(2):
pubmed: 24492710
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016 Jan;1859(1):169-76
pubmed: 26149773
Nat Rev Genet. 2019 Feb;20(2):71-88
pubmed: 30410101
Nat Commun. 2017 Sep 7;8(1):467
pubmed: 28883545
Annu Rev Biochem. 2016 Jun 2;85:375-404
pubmed: 27145840
ScientificWorldJournal. 2006 May 26;6:1888-910
pubmed: 17205195
J Vis Exp. 2017 Oct 26;(128):
pubmed: 29155727
N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 05;378(14):1323-1334
pubmed: 29617578
Epigenetics. 2014 May;9(5):704-17
pubmed: 24513574
Int J Clin Oncol. 2019 Feb;24(2):115-122
pubmed: 30515675
Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1894:181-227
pubmed: 30547463
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 10;12(8):e0182562
pubmed: 28796802
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Mar 2;97(5):339-46
pubmed: 15741570
Hum Mol Genet. 2008 Sep 1;17(17):2633-43
pubmed: 18541649
Nat Commun. 2018 Oct 8;9(1):4120
pubmed: 30297886
J Mol Diagn. 2012 Jan;14(1):22-9
pubmed: 22166544