Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization alone or combined with ablation for recurrent intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching study.
Adult
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
/ pathology
Chemoembolization, Therapeutic
/ methods
Cohort Studies
Female
Humans
Liver Neoplasms
/ pathology
Male
Microwaves
/ therapeutic use
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
/ pathology
Neoplasm Staging
Prognosis
Progression-Free Survival
Propensity Score
Radiofrequency Ablation
/ methods
Retrospective Studies
Survival Rate
Recurrent intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma
Survival
Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization
Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with ablation
Journal
Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology
ISSN: 1432-1335
Titre abrégé: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7902060
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2020
Oct 2020
Historique:
received:
05
03
2020
accepted:
12
05
2020
pubmed:
26
5
2020
medline:
17
9
2020
entrez:
26
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The recurrence after curative hepatectomy is common. Limited data have investigated the effect of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with ablation in treating recurrent intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after hepatectomy. We aim to compare the efficacy of TACE combined with ablation versus TACE alone in treating recurrent intermediate-stage HCC after hepatectomy. A total of 183 patients with recurrent intermediate-stage HCC after hepatectomy were enrolled at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, including 111 patients who underwent TACE alone and 72 patients who underwent TACE combined with ablation (TACE-Ablation). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared by the log-rank test. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce the confounding bias. Before PSM, the 5-year OS rates were 43.3% vs. 27.9% (P = 0.001), and the 5-year PFS rates were 21.7% vs. 13.0% (P < 0.001) for TACE-Ablation and TACE-alone groups, respectively. After PSM, TACE-Ablation still resulted in better 5-year OS (41.6% vs. 30.2%, P = 0.028) and 5-year PFS rate (21.3% vs. 15.8%, P = 0.024) than that of TACE alone. Patients in TACE-Ablation group exhibited similar major complication rates to TACE-alone group but higher minor complication rates both before and after PSM. Cox regression analysis identified TACE-alone modality as an independently unfavourable predictor for OS and PFS (both P < 0.05). TACE combined with ablation is safe and superior to TACE alone in tumour control and prolonging overall survival in recurrent intermediate-stage HCC after hepatectomy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32449005
doi: 10.1007/s00432-020-03254-2
pii: 10.1007/s00432-020-03254-2
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2669-2680Subventions
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 81772598
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 81772625
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 81802421
Organisme : Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province
ID : No. 2017A030311006
Organisme : Guangzhou Science and Technology Program of China
ID : No. 201804020093