Truth, Lies, and Gossip.

accuracy competition gossip lies open data open materials preregistered reciprocity trust

Journal

Psychological science
ISSN: 1467-9280
Titre abrégé: Psychol Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9007542

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 27 5 2020
medline: 17 4 2021
entrez: 27 5 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

It is widely assumed that people will share inaccurate gossip for their own selfish purposes. This assumption, if true, presents a challenge to the growing body of work positing that gossip is a ready source of accurate reputational information and therefore is welfare improving. We tested this inaccuracy assumption by examining the frequency and form of spontaneous lies shared between gossiping members of networks playing a series of one-shot trust games (

Identifiants

pubmed: 32453621
doi: 10.1177/0956797620916708
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

702-714

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Auteurs

Kim Peters (K)

University of Exeter Business School.
School of Psychology, University of Queensland.

Miguel A Fonseca (MA)

University of Exeter Business School.
Centre for Research in Economics and Management (NIPE), University of Minho.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH