Machine learning-aided quantification of antibody-based cancer immunotherapy by natural killer cells in microfluidic droplets.
Journal
Lab on a chip
ISSN: 1473-0189
Titre abrégé: Lab Chip
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101128948
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 06 2020
30 06 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
28
5
2020
medline:
22
6
2021
entrez:
28
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Natural killer (NK) cells have emerged as an effective alternative option to T cell-based immunotherapies, particularly against liquid (hematologic) tumors. However, the effectiveness of NK cell therapy has been less than optimal for solid tumors, partly due to the heterogeneity in target interaction leading to variable anti-tumor cytotoxicity. This paper describes a microfluidic droplet-based cytotoxicity assay for quantitative comparison of immunotherapeutic NK-92 cell interaction with various types of target cells. Machine learning algorithms were developed to assess the dynamics of individual effector-target cell pair conjugation and target death in droplets in a semi-automated manner. Our results showed that while short contacts were sufficient to induce potent killing of hematological cancer cells, long-lasting stable conjugation with NK-92 cells was unable to kill HER2+ solid tumor cells (SKOV3, SKBR3) significantly. NK-92 cells that were engineered to express FcγRIII (CD16) mediated antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) selectively against HER2+ cells upon addition of Herceptin (trastuzumab). The requirement of CD16, Herceptin and specific pre-incubation temperature served as three inputs to generate a molecular logic function with HER2+ cell death as the output. Mass proteomic analysis of the two effector cell lines suggested differential changes in adhesion, exocytosis, metabolism, transport and activation of upstream regulators and cytotoxicity mediators, which can be utilized to regulate specific functionalities of NK-92 cells in future. These results suggest that this semi-automated single cell assay can reveal the variability and functional potency of NK cells and may be used to optimize immunotherapeutic efficacy for preclinical analyses.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32458907
doi: 10.1039/d0lc00158a
pmc: PMC7938931
mid: NIHMS1600937
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2317-2327Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA218500
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 GM120272
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 GM127714
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R35 GM136421
Pays : United States
Références
J Proteome Res. 2005 Jan-Feb;4(1):75-82
pubmed: 15707360
Blood. 2013 Feb 21;121(8):1326-34
pubmed: 23287857
Int J Cancer. 2017 Aug 1;141(3):583-593
pubmed: 28477372
Nat Rev Immunol. 2008 Sep;8(9):713-25
pubmed: 19172692
Mol Immunol. 1990 Apr;27(4):327-33
pubmed: 2359411
Curr Opin Syst Biol. 2018 Aug;10:43-52
pubmed: 30159406
Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Dec 15;15(24):7479-7491
pubmed: 20008848
Bioinformatics. 2014 Feb 15;30(4):523-30
pubmed: 24336805
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 02;10(12):e0143798
pubmed: 26630674
Bioinformatics. 2017 Jul 01;33(13):2010-2019
pubmed: 28203779
Sens Actuators B Chem. 2019 Mar 1;282:580-589
pubmed: 31537955
J Immunol. 2006 Apr 1;176(7):4173-81
pubmed: 16547254
Cancer Res. 2011 Nov 1;71(21):6621-32
pubmed: 21937679
Cancers (Basel). 2018 Nov 05;10(11):
pubmed: 30400618
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jun 28;113(26):E3599-608
pubmed: 27303033
Nat Biomed Eng. 2018 Oct;2(10):761-772
pubmed: 30854249
Biomicrofluidics. 2016 Oct 12;10(5):054115
pubmed: 27795747
ACS Sens. 2018 Jan 26;3(1):13-26
pubmed: 29168381
Chem Soc Rev. 2018 Apr 3;47(7):2228-2248
pubmed: 29493684
J Immunol. 2008 Sep 15;181(6):3784-92
pubmed: 18768831
Lab Chip. 2015 Dec 7;15(23):4441-50
pubmed: 26456240
J Immunol. 2018 Jan 15;200(2):459-468
pubmed: 29311388
Front Immunol. 2015 Jul 27;6:368
pubmed: 26284063
Mol Cell Biochem. 2015 Oct;408(1-2):89-102
pubmed: 26116017
Cell Death Differ. 2010 Apr;17(4):586-95
pubmed: 19893573
Front Immunol. 2016 Mar 14;7:91
pubmed: 27014270
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2019 Jan 17;11:53-69
pubmed: 30697064
Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res. 2017 Jul;773:91-103
pubmed: 28927539
Cytometry A. 2011 Sep;79(9):684-93
pubmed: 21786419
Biochemistry (Mosc). 2007 Jul;72(7):716-27
pubmed: 17680763
J Am Chem Soc. 2007 Jul 4;129(26):8345-52
pubmed: 17559210
Cancer Res. 2007 Dec 15;67(24):11991-9
pubmed: 18089830
Front Immunol. 2017 Dec 14;8:1736
pubmed: 29312292
J Immunol. 2005 May 1;174(9):5261-9
pubmed: 15843522
J Immunol. 2007 Sep 1;179(5):2815-23
pubmed: 17709495
Front Immunol. 2017 May 18;8:533
pubmed: 28572802
Oncotarget. 2016 Dec 27;7(52):86359-86373
pubmed: 27861156
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 30;8(1):11455
pubmed: 30061662
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jan 8;47(D1):D607-D613
pubmed: 30476243
Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Mar 15;15(6):2010-21
pubmed: 19276287
Front Immunol. 2019 Aug 09;10:1782
pubmed: 31456796
Blood. 2014 Nov 20;124(22):3241-9
pubmed: 25232058
Mol Syst Biol. 2017 Apr 18;13(4):924
pubmed: 28420678
Oncoimmunology. 2014 Apr 15;3:e28147
pubmed: 25340009
J Exp Med. 2019 Sep 2;216(9):2113-2127
pubmed: 31270246
Blood. 2002 Aug 15;100(4):1265-73
pubmed: 12149207
J Am Chem Soc. 2015 Jan 21;137(2):667-74
pubmed: 25361164
Biomed Rep. 2017 Nov;7(5):400-406
pubmed: 29181152
Mol Syst Biol. 2010 Jun 8;6:370
pubmed: 20531400
Front Immunol. 2015 Jul 20;6:355
pubmed: 26257729
Science. 2015 Apr 3;348(6230):62-8
pubmed: 25838374
J Immunol. 2013 Oct 1;191(7):3545-52
pubmed: 24006464