Content and Quality of Infant Feeding Smartphone Apps: Five-Year Update on a Systematic Search and Evaluation.
bottle feeding
breast feeding
breastfeeding
consumer health information
infant food
mobile apps
readability
smartphones
Journal
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
ISSN: 2291-5222
Titre abrégé: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101624439
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 05 2020
27 05 2020
Historique:
received:
05
12
2019
accepted:
12
03
2020
revised:
10
03
2020
entrez:
28
5
2020
pubmed:
28
5
2020
medline:
28
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Parents use apps to access information on child health, but there are no standards for providing evidence-based advice, support, and information. Well-developed apps that promote appropriate infant feeding and play can support healthy growth and development. A 2015 systematic assessment of smartphone apps in Australia about infant feeding and play found that most apps had minimal information, with poor readability and app quality. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the information and quality of smartphone apps providing information on breastfeeding, formula feeding, introducing solids, or infant play for consumers. The Google Play store and Apple App Store were searched for free and paid Android and iPhone Operating System (iOS) apps using keywords for infant feeding, breastfeeding, formula feeding, and tummy time. The apps were evaluated between September 2018 and January 2019 for information content based on Australian guidelines, app quality using the 5-point Mobile App Rating Scale, readability, and suitability of health information. A total of 2196 unique apps were found and screened. Overall, 47 apps were evaluated, totaling 59 evaluations for apps across both the Android and iOS platforms. In all, 11 apps had affiliations to universities and health services as app developers, writers, or editors. Furthermore, 33 apps were commercially developed. The information contained within the apps was poor: 64% (38/59) of the evaluations found no or low coverage of information found in the Australian guidelines on infant feeding and activity, and 53% (31/59) of the evaluations found incomplete or incorrect information with regard to the depth of information provided. Subjective app assessment by health care practitioners on whether they would use, purchase, or recommend the app ranged from poor to acceptable (median 2.50). Objective assessment of the apps' engagement, functionality, aesthetics, and information was scored as acceptable (median 3.63). The median readability score for the apps was at the American Grade 8 reading level. The suitability of health information was rated superior or adequate for content, reading demand, layout, and interaction with the readers. The quality of smartphone apps on infant feeding and activity was moderate based on the objective measurements of engagement, functionality, aesthetics, and information from a reliable source. The overall quality of information on infant feeding and activity was poor, indicated by low coverage of topics and incomplete or partially complete information. The key areas for improvement involved providing evidence-based information consistent with the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council's Infant Feeding Guidelines. Apps supported and developed by health care professionals with adequate health service funding can ensure that parents are provided with credible and reliable resources.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Parents use apps to access information on child health, but there are no standards for providing evidence-based advice, support, and information. Well-developed apps that promote appropriate infant feeding and play can support healthy growth and development. A 2015 systematic assessment of smartphone apps in Australia about infant feeding and play found that most apps had minimal information, with poor readability and app quality.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to systematically evaluate the information and quality of smartphone apps providing information on breastfeeding, formula feeding, introducing solids, or infant play for consumers.
METHODS
The Google Play store and Apple App Store were searched for free and paid Android and iPhone Operating System (iOS) apps using keywords for infant feeding, breastfeeding, formula feeding, and tummy time. The apps were evaluated between September 2018 and January 2019 for information content based on Australian guidelines, app quality using the 5-point Mobile App Rating Scale, readability, and suitability of health information.
RESULTS
A total of 2196 unique apps were found and screened. Overall, 47 apps were evaluated, totaling 59 evaluations for apps across both the Android and iOS platforms. In all, 11 apps had affiliations to universities and health services as app developers, writers, or editors. Furthermore, 33 apps were commercially developed. The information contained within the apps was poor: 64% (38/59) of the evaluations found no or low coverage of information found in the Australian guidelines on infant feeding and activity, and 53% (31/59) of the evaluations found incomplete or incorrect information with regard to the depth of information provided. Subjective app assessment by health care practitioners on whether they would use, purchase, or recommend the app ranged from poor to acceptable (median 2.50). Objective assessment of the apps' engagement, functionality, aesthetics, and information was scored as acceptable (median 3.63). The median readability score for the apps was at the American Grade 8 reading level. The suitability of health information was rated superior or adequate for content, reading demand, layout, and interaction with the readers.
CONCLUSIONS
The quality of smartphone apps on infant feeding and activity was moderate based on the objective measurements of engagement, functionality, aesthetics, and information from a reliable source. The overall quality of information on infant feeding and activity was poor, indicated by low coverage of topics and incomplete or partially complete information. The key areas for improvement involved providing evidence-based information consistent with the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council's Infant Feeding Guidelines. Apps supported and developed by health care professionals with adequate health service funding can ensure that parents are provided with credible and reliable resources.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32459187
pii: v8i5e17300
doi: 10.2196/17300
pmc: PMC7287747
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e17300Informations de copyright
©Heilok Cheng, Alison Tutt, Catherine Llewellyn, Donna Size, Jennifer Jones, Sarah Taki, Chris Rossiter, Elizabeth Denney-Wilson. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 27.05.2020.
Références
Int J Clin Pract. 2014 Feb;68(2):155-62
pubmed: 24460614
BMJ. 2012 Jun 26;344:e3732
pubmed: 22735103
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Jun 27;4(2):e81
pubmed: 27349756
Interact J Med Res. 2015 Jun 22;4(2):e12
pubmed: 26099207
Aust J Prim Health. 2017 Dec;23(6):560-566
pubmed: 29183564
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Sep 27;21(9):e13947
pubmed: 31573903
Front Public Health. 2019 Mar 22;7:60
pubmed: 30984732
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019 Jun 25;10:397
pubmed: 31293515
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2019 Jun 20;2(1):e12157
pubmed: 31518324
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Dec 06;5(12):e186
pubmed: 29212627
Public Health. 2017 Feb;143:71-77
pubmed: 28159029
Interact J Med Res. 2015 Sep 29;4(3):e18
pubmed: 26420339
Public Health Nurs. 2017 Nov;34(6):561-568
pubmed: 28762533
Appetite. 2011 Dec;57(3):791-5
pubmed: 21784114
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81
pubmed: 18929686
J Hum Lact. 2018 Aug;34(3):543-555
pubmed: 29787686
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Jul 19;16(1):171
pubmed: 27435182
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Jul 17;6(7):e155
pubmed: 30021706
Health Soc Care Community. 2019 Mar;27(2):472-482
pubmed: 30368952
J Hum Lact. 2016 Nov;32(4):NP95-NP104
pubmed: 26416440
Matern Child Nutr. 2019 Jul;15(3):e12768
pubmed: 30569549
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 Nov;294(5):937-944
pubmed: 27084763
Health Promot J Austr. 2020 Sep;31(3):340-342
pubmed: 31225924
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2014 May 16;2(2):e24
pubmed: 25099752
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Jan 3;16(1):1
pubmed: 30606197
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Dec 18;5(12):e196
pubmed: 29254908
Aust J Prim Health. 2013;19(4):313-8
pubmed: 23899373
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 29;16(7):
pubmed: 30934967
J Hum Lact. 2018 Nov;34(4):711-720
pubmed: 30235043
Mhealth. 2018 Jan 10;4:2
pubmed: 29445731
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Mar 11;3(1):e27
pubmed: 25760773
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Nov 16;6(11):e189
pubmed: 30446483
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2016 Jul-Sep;30(3):198-203
pubmed: 27465449
Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 May;89(5):565-8
pubmed: 15834086
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Apr 15;7(4):e11620
pubmed: 30985282