Jejunostomy Tube Insertion for Enteral Nutrition: Comparison of Outcomes after Laparoscopic versus Radiologic Insertion.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Enteral Nutrition
/ adverse effects
Female
Humans
Jejunostomy
/ adverse effects
Laparoscopy
/ adverse effects
Male
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications
/ etiology
Radiography, Interventional
/ adverse effects
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
Journal
Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR
ISSN: 1535-7732
Titre abrégé: J Vasc Interv Radiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9203369
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2020
Jul 2020
Historique:
received:
13
09
2019
revised:
13
12
2019
accepted:
13
12
2019
pubmed:
29
5
2020
medline:
3
11
2020
entrez:
29
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To retrospectively compare technical success and major complication rates of laparoscopically versus radiologically inserted jejunostomy tubes. In this single-institution retrospective study, 115 patients (60 men; mean age, 59.7 y) underwent attempted laparoscopic jejunostomy tube insertion as a standalone procedure during a 10-year period and 106 patients (64 men; mean age, 61.0 y) underwent attempted direct percutaneous radiologic jejunostomy tube insertion during an overlapping 6-year period. Clinical outcomes were retrospectively reviewed with primary focus on predictors of procedure-related major complications within 30 days. Patients undergoing laparoscopic jejunostomy tube insertion were less likely to have previous major abdominal surgery (P < .001) or to be critically ill (P < .001) and had a higher body mass index (P = .001) than patients undergoing radiologic insertion. Technical success rates were 95% (110 of 115) for laparoscopic and 97% (103 of 106) for radiologic jejunostomy tube insertion (P = .72). Major procedural complications occurred in 7 patients (6%) in the laparoscopic group and in 5 (5%) in the radiologic group (P = 1.0). For laparoscopic jejunostomy tubes, only previous major abdominal surgery was significantly associated with a higher major procedure complication rate (14% [5 of 37] vs 3% [2 of 78] in those without; P = .039). In the radiologic jejunostomy group, only obesity was significantly associated with a higher major complication rate: 20% (2 of 10) vs 3% (3 of 96) in nonobese patients (P = .038). Laparoscopic and radiologic jejunostomy tube insertion both showed high success and low complication rates. Previous major abdominal surgery and obesity may be pertinent discriminators for patient selection.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32460963
pii: S1051-0443(19)31044-9
doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.12.010
pmc: PMC7549126
mid: NIHMS1634590
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1132-1138Subventions
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : T32 GM007171
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Références
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2011 Jun;12(3):163-8
pubmed: 21767148
Surg Endosc. 2004 Feb;18(2):307-9
pubmed: 14708043
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jan;30(1):126-31
pubmed: 25801114
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2008 Mar-Apr;31(2):336-41
pubmed: 17943346
J Trauma. 2008 Nov;65(5):1072-7
pubmed: 19001975
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013 Dec;24(12):1845-52
pubmed: 24094674
Clin Radiol. 2007 Nov;62(11):1061-5; discussion 1066-8
pubmed: 17920864
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2000 Jan;11(1):101-6
pubmed: 10693720
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011 Aug;22(8):1089-106
pubmed: 21782465
Clin Nutr. 2005 Oct;24(5):719-26
pubmed: 16143431
Crit Care Med. 2001 Aug;29(8):1495-501
pubmed: 11505114
World J Surg. 2007 Mar;31(3):556-60; discussion 561
pubmed: 16957821
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009 Dec;20(12):1583-7
pubmed: 19854072
Surg Endosc. 1996 Oct;10(10):1008-11
pubmed: 8864096
West J Med. 1995 Feb;162(2):117-22
pubmed: 7725683
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003 Sep;14(9 Pt 2):S199-202
pubmed: 14514818
J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 May;20(5):970-5
pubmed: 26895952
Surg Endosc. 2005 Jul;19(7):951-7
pubmed: 15920697
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Nov;185(5):1369
pubmed: 16247172