Comparison of the Effects of Two Cochlear Implant Fine Structure Coding Strategies on Speech Perception.


Journal

American journal of audiology
ISSN: 1558-9137
Titre abrégé: Am J Audiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9114917

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 Jun 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 29 5 2020
medline: 7 4 2021
entrez: 29 5 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Purpose This study aims to investigate the effect of upgrading from the fine structure processing (FSP) coding strategy to the novel fine structure strategy "FS4" in adults in adults with cochlear implants manufactured by MED-EL GmbH (Innsbruck, Austria). Method A crossover, double-blinded study was conducted for 12 weeks. Twelve adult participants were randomly assigned to two groups. During the first 6-week test interval, one group continued to use their everyday FSP strategy, whereas the other group was upgraded to the FS4 strategy. In the second 6-week interval, the two groups switched coding strategies. Speech perception was measured at the end of each test interval with the Oldenburg Sentence Test and the Göttingen Sentence Test. Participants completed the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale at the end of each test interval and a simple preference test at the end of the study. Results There was no significant difference in speech perception test results obtained with the Oldenburg Sentence Test and the Göttingen Sentence Test, neither in quiet nor in noise. Participants' Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale self-evaluation and preference test results showed that the two coding strategies had similar effects on their hearing perception. No clear preference for either of the strategies was found. Conclusions Speech perception test results and the participants' level of satisfaction were similar for the two FS coding strategies. Despite differences in the presentation of temporal fine structure between FSP and FS4, a clear benefit of the newer FS4 strategy could not be shown.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32464082
doi: 10.1044/2020_AJA-19-00110
doi:

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

226-235

Auteurs

Verena Müller (V)

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Cochlear Implant Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Germany.

Heinz Dieter Klünter (HD)

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Cochlear Implant Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Germany.

Dirk Fürstenberg (D)

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Cochlear Implant Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Germany.

Martin Walger (M)

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Cochlear Implant Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Germany.

Ruth Lang-Roth (R)

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Cochlear Implant Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH