Clinical impact of left ventricular paced conduction disturbance in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Cardiac death
Cardiac resynchronization therapy
Heart failure
Paced conduction delay
Single photon emission computed tomography
Journal
Heart rhythm
ISSN: 1556-3871
Titre abrégé: Heart Rhythm
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101200317
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2020
11 2020
Historique:
received:
29
01
2020
revised:
14
05
2020
accepted:
19
05
2020
pubmed:
30
5
2020
medline:
15
9
2021
entrez:
30
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Myocardial scarring is associated with nonresponse to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and conduction delay. Little is known about the significance and cause of left ventricular (LV) paced conduction disturbance (LPCD). The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical impact of paced interlead electrical delay and the difference in each conduction time from LV pace to right ventricular (RV) sense (LVp-RVs) and from RV pace to LV sense (RVp-LVs) [(LVp-RVs) - (RVp-LVs)], in CRT. Among 137 patients who underwent CRT implantation, LVp-RVs and RVp-LVs were measured intraoperatively. The relationships between [(LVp-RVs) - (RVp-LVs)] and perfusion defects on myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging or [(LVp-RVs) - (RVp-LVs)] and clinical outcomes were assessed. After CRT implantation, 81 patients (59%) responded to CRT. [(LVp-RVs) - (RVp-LVs)] was significantly longer in nonresponders than in responders (9.7 ± 47.3 ms vs -4.5 ± 33.2 ms; P = .041). Patients with LPCD [(LVp-RVs) > (RVp-LVs)] had higher perfusion defects in the anterolateral region (2.7 ± 2.7 vs 1.1 ± 1.6; P = .0015) on SPECT. Multivariate analysis showed that LPCD was the independent predictor of nonresponse to CRT (odds ratio 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.17-0.90; P = .026). During median follow-up of 2.3 years (interquartile range 1.3-5.5), LPCD was the independent predictor of cardiac death and/or heart failure hospitalization in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 2.04; 95% CI 1.19-3.55; P = .010). LPCD could predict nonresponse to CRT and poor outcome. Further intervention, such as adjustment of pacing timing or multipoint/site pacing, may be needed in such patients.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Myocardial scarring is associated with nonresponse to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and conduction delay. Little is known about the significance and cause of left ventricular (LV) paced conduction disturbance (LPCD).
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical impact of paced interlead electrical delay and the difference in each conduction time from LV pace to right ventricular (RV) sense (LVp-RVs) and from RV pace to LV sense (RVp-LVs) [(LVp-RVs) - (RVp-LVs)], in CRT.
METHODS
Among 137 patients who underwent CRT implantation, LVp-RVs and RVp-LVs were measured intraoperatively. The relationships between [(LVp-RVs) - (RVp-LVs)] and perfusion defects on myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging or [(LVp-RVs) - (RVp-LVs)] and clinical outcomes were assessed.
RESULTS
After CRT implantation, 81 patients (59%) responded to CRT. [(LVp-RVs) - (RVp-LVs)] was significantly longer in nonresponders than in responders (9.7 ± 47.3 ms vs -4.5 ± 33.2 ms; P = .041). Patients with LPCD [(LVp-RVs) > (RVp-LVs)] had higher perfusion defects in the anterolateral region (2.7 ± 2.7 vs 1.1 ± 1.6; P = .0015) on SPECT. Multivariate analysis showed that LPCD was the independent predictor of nonresponse to CRT (odds ratio 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.17-0.90; P = .026). During median follow-up of 2.3 years (interquartile range 1.3-5.5), LPCD was the independent predictor of cardiac death and/or heart failure hospitalization in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 2.04; 95% CI 1.19-3.55; P = .010).
CONCLUSION
LPCD could predict nonresponse to CRT and poor outcome. Further intervention, such as adjustment of pacing timing or multipoint/site pacing, may be needed in such patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32470623
pii: S1547-5271(20)30527-0
doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.05.031
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1870-1877Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.