Cryopreservation of donkey embryos: Comparison of embryo survival rate after in vitro culture between conventional freezing and vitrification.


Journal

Theriogenology
ISSN: 1879-3231
Titre abrégé: Theriogenology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0421510

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Sep 2020
Historique:
received: 30 01 2020
revised: 11 05 2020
accepted: 12 05 2020
pubmed: 30 5 2020
medline: 22 6 2021
entrez: 30 5 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Embryo cryopreservation ensures that genetic biodiversity is preserved over time. This study evaluates the survival of donkey embryos subjected to slow freezing and vitrification after thawing and in vitro culture. Seven-day-old in vivo produced donkey embryos were subjected to slow freezing (SF, N = 14) or vitrification (VIT, N = 22). After one year of cryopreservation, embryos were warmed, washed and placed in incubation for in vitro culture (IVC). In order to assess the embryo viability, the quality grade and developmental stage were recorded after thawing and after 24 and 48 h of IVC. Eleven embryos (SF = 4 and VIT = 7) were incubated under a time-lapse camera, for up to 68 h, in order to determine the area and growth. The survival rate was not influenced by the procedure but by the developmental stage: after 48 h of IVC blastocyst survival rate (1/8, 12.5%) was significantly lower compared to both morulas (8/12, 66.7%) and early blastocysts (11/16, 68.7%) (P < 0.05). Embryo diameter class at recovery did not significantly influence the survival rate. In terms of the embryos that were judged to be alive after 48 h of IVC, quality grade 1 was observed in 7/8 (88%) and 4/12 (33%) of the SF and VIT embryos, respectively (P < 0.05). After time-lapse analysis, the IVC embryo area as well as growth percentage were statistically higher in the SF than the VIT embryos (P < 0.05). In conclusion, no difference in survival rates was found between the two cryopreservation procedures, although embryo quality was more negatively affected by vitrification.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32470704
pii: S0093-691X(20)30304-6
doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.05.020
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

11-16

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

D Fanelli (D)

Veterinary Sciences Department, Pisa University, San Piero a Grado, Via Livornese, 56124, Pisa, Italy. Electronic address: diana.equirepro@gmail.com.

D Panzani (D)

Veterinary Sciences Department, Pisa University, San Piero a Grado, Via Livornese, 56124, Pisa, Italy.

A Rota (A)

Veterinary Sciences Department, Pisa University, San Piero a Grado, Via Livornese, 56124, Pisa, Italy.

M Tesi (M)

Veterinary Sciences Department, Pisa University, San Piero a Grado, Via Livornese, 56124, Pisa, Italy.

F Camillo (F)

Veterinary Sciences Department, Pisa University, San Piero a Grado, Via Livornese, 56124, Pisa, Italy.

H Bollwein (H)

Clinic of Reproductive Medicine, Department for Farm Animals, University of Zurich, Zurich, 8057, Switzerland.

C Herrera (C)

Clinic of Reproductive Medicine, Department for Farm Animals, University of Zurich, Zurich, 8057, Switzerland.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH