The effect of surgical trauma on circulating free DNA levels in cancer patients-implications for studies of circulating tumor DNA.
bladder cancer
cell-free DNA
circulating tumor DNA
colorectal cancer
trauma
Journal
Molecular oncology
ISSN: 1878-0261
Titre abrégé: Mol Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101308230
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2020
08 2020
Historique:
received:
16
01
2020
revised:
01
04
2020
accepted:
20
05
2020
pubmed:
30
5
2020
medline:
1
7
2021
entrez:
30
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) post-treatment is an emerging marker of residual disease. ctDNA constitutes only a minor fraction of the cell-free DNA (cfDNA) circulating in cancer patients, complicating ctDNA detection. This is exacerbated by trauma-induced cfDNA. To guide optimal blood sample timing, we investigated the duration and magnitude of surgical trauma-induced cfDNA in patients with colorectal or bladder cancer. DNA levels were quantified in paired plasma samples collected before and up to 6 weeks after surgery from 436 patients with colorectal cancer and 47 patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. To assess whether trauma-induced cfDNA fragments are longer than ordinary cfDNA fragments, the concentration of short (< 1 kb) and long (> 1 kb) fragments was determined for 91 patients. Previously reported ctDNA data from 91 patients with colorectal cancer and 47 patients with bladder cancer were used to assess how trauma-induced DNA affects ctDNA detection. The total cfDNA level increased postoperatively-both in patients with colorectal cancer (mean threefold) and bladder cancer (mean eightfold). The DNA levels were significantly increased up to 4 weeks after surgery in both patient cohorts (P = 0.0005 and P ≤ 0.0001). The concentration of short, but not long, cfDNA fragments increased postoperatively. Of 25 patients with radiological relapse, eight were ctDNA-positive and 17 were ctDNA-negative in the period with trauma-induced DNA. Analysis of longitudinal samples revealed that five of the negative patients became positive shortly after the release of trauma-induced cfDNA had ceased. In conclusion, surgery was associated with elevated cfDNA levels, persisting up to 4 weeks, which may have masked ctDNA in relapse patients. Trauma-induced cfDNA was of similar size to ordinary cfDNA. To mitigate the impact of trauma-induced cfDNA on ctDNA detection, it is recommended that a second blood sample collected after week 4 is analyzed for patients initially ctDNA negative.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32471011
doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12729
pmc: PMC7400779
doi:
Substances chimiques
Circulating Tumor DNA
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1670-1679Subventions
Organisme : Strategiske Forskningsråd
ID : 1309-00006B
Pays : International
Organisme : Dansk Kraeftforsknings Fond
ID : FID1839672
Pays : International
Organisme : Det Frie Forskningsråd
ID : 4183-00619
Pays : International
Organisme : Det Frie Forskningsråd
ID : 7016-00369B
Pays : International
Organisme : Kraeftens Bekaempelse
ID : R107-A7035
Pays : International
Organisme : Kraeftens Bekaempelse
ID : R124-A7508
Pays : International
Organisme : Kraeftens Bekaempelse
ID : R133-A8520-00-S41
Pays : International
Organisme : Kraeftens Bekaempelse
ID : R146-A9466-16-S2
Pays : International
Organisme : Novo Nordisk Fonden
ID : NNF14OC0012747
Pays : International
Organisme : Novo Nordisk Fonden
ID : NNF17OC0024464
Pays : International
Organisme : Novo Nordisk Fonden
ID : NNF17OC0025052
Pays : International
Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Published by FEBS Press and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Cancer Discov. 2017 Dec;7(12):1394-1403
pubmed: 28899864
Cancer Res. 2017 Oct 1;77(19):5419-5427
pubmed: 28807936
Sci Transl Med. 2015 Aug 26;7(302):302ra133
pubmed: 26311728
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2019 May 22;7(1):29
pubmed: 31119471
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Aug 1;2(8):1014-22
pubmed: 27055085
Sci Transl Med. 2016 Jul 6;8(346):346ra92
pubmed: 27384348
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2017 Oct;61(9):1084-1094
pubmed: 28766696
JAMA. 2011 Jun 8;305(22):2335-42
pubmed: 21642686
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Sep 15;23(18):5437-5445
pubmed: 28600478
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jun 20;37(18):1547-1557
pubmed: 31059311
Clin Chem. 2003 Aug;49(8):1286-91
pubmed: 12881444
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2018 Oct 09;16:370-378
pubmed: 30364656
Clin Chim Acta. 2015 Jun 15;446:141-6
pubmed: 25896958
Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2016;2016:2794364
pubmed: 27882047
JAMA Oncol. 2019 May 9;:
pubmed: 31070691
Gut. 2016 Apr;65(4):625-34
pubmed: 25654990
Nat Med. 2008 Sep;14(9):985-90
pubmed: 18670422
Clin Chim Acta. 2013 Sep 23;424:109-13
pubmed: 23735580
Crit Care. 2017 Jan 24;21(1):14
pubmed: 28118843
Cancer Res. 2001 Feb 15;61(4):1659-65
pubmed: 11245480
Cancer Med. 2017 May;6(5):962-974
pubmed: 28382702
Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Nov 1;21(21):4786-800
pubmed: 26527805
J Surg Oncol. 2015 Oct;112(5):538-43
pubmed: 26271357