Differential expression of hemolysin genes in weakly and strongly hemolytic Brachyspira hyodysenteriae strains.
Brachyspira hyodysenteriae
Hemolysin genes
Strong hemolysis
Swine dysentery
Transcription
Weak hemolysis
mRNA
Journal
BMC veterinary research
ISSN: 1746-6148
Titre abrégé: BMC Vet Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101249759
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 May 2020
29 May 2020
Historique:
received:
12
08
2019
accepted:
21
05
2020
entrez:
31
5
2020
pubmed:
31
5
2020
medline:
5
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Swine dysentery (SD) is a diarrheal disease in fattening pigs that is caused by the strongly hemolytic species Brachyspira (B.) hyodysenteriae, B. hampsonii and B. suanatina. As weakly hemolytic Brachyspira spp. are considered less virulent or even non-pathogenic, the hemolysin is regarded as an important factor in the pathogenesis of SD. Four hemolysin genes (tlyA, tlyB, tlyC, and hlyA) and four putative hemolysin genes (hemolysin, hemolysin activation protein, hemolysin III, and hemolysin channel protein) have been reported, but their role in strong hemolysis is not entirely clear. Our study aimed to assess the transcriptional activity of eight (putative) hemolysin genes in a strongly hemolytic (B204) and a weakly hemolytic (G423) B. hyodysenteriae strain during non-hemolytic and hemolytic growth stages. Strongly and weakly hemolytic B. hyodysenteriae strains caused hemolysis on blood agar at different growth stages, namely during log phase (B204) and stationary/death phase (G423). During the lag, early log, late log (stationary phase in G423) and death phase (time points 1-4) strains differed in their hemolysin gene transcription patterns. At time point 1, transcription of the putative hemolysin gene was higher in B204 than in G423. At time point 2, tlyA and tlyC were upregulated in B204 during hemolysis. TlyB and hlyA were upregulated in both strains at all time points, but higher transcription rates were observed in the weakly hemolytic strain G423. The transcription activity of the hemolysin channel protein gene was quite similar in both strains, whereas the hemolysin activation protein gene was upregulated in the non-hemolytic stage of B204 at time point 4. Sequence analysis revealed deletions, insertions and single nucleotide polymorphisms in the G423 hlyA promoter, although without altering the transcription activity of this gene. Our data indicate a combined activity of TlyA and TlyC as the most probable underlying mechanism of strong hemolysis in B. hyodysenteriae. Further studies should verify if the expression of tlyA is upregulated by the putative hemolysin gene. Depending on their immunogenic potential TlyA and TlyC may serve as possible vaccine candidates, especially since vaccines for an effective control of swine dysentery are currently not available.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Swine dysentery (SD) is a diarrheal disease in fattening pigs that is caused by the strongly hemolytic species Brachyspira (B.) hyodysenteriae, B. hampsonii and B. suanatina. As weakly hemolytic Brachyspira spp. are considered less virulent or even non-pathogenic, the hemolysin is regarded as an important factor in the pathogenesis of SD. Four hemolysin genes (tlyA, tlyB, tlyC, and hlyA) and four putative hemolysin genes (hemolysin, hemolysin activation protein, hemolysin III, and hemolysin channel protein) have been reported, but their role in strong hemolysis is not entirely clear. Our study aimed to assess the transcriptional activity of eight (putative) hemolysin genes in a strongly hemolytic (B204) and a weakly hemolytic (G423) B. hyodysenteriae strain during non-hemolytic and hemolytic growth stages.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Strongly and weakly hemolytic B. hyodysenteriae strains caused hemolysis on blood agar at different growth stages, namely during log phase (B204) and stationary/death phase (G423). During the lag, early log, late log (stationary phase in G423) and death phase (time points 1-4) strains differed in their hemolysin gene transcription patterns. At time point 1, transcription of the putative hemolysin gene was higher in B204 than in G423. At time point 2, tlyA and tlyC were upregulated in B204 during hemolysis. TlyB and hlyA were upregulated in both strains at all time points, but higher transcription rates were observed in the weakly hemolytic strain G423. The transcription activity of the hemolysin channel protein gene was quite similar in both strains, whereas the hemolysin activation protein gene was upregulated in the non-hemolytic stage of B204 at time point 4. Sequence analysis revealed deletions, insertions and single nucleotide polymorphisms in the G423 hlyA promoter, although without altering the transcription activity of this gene.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Our data indicate a combined activity of TlyA and TlyC as the most probable underlying mechanism of strong hemolysis in B. hyodysenteriae. Further studies should verify if the expression of tlyA is upregulated by the putative hemolysin gene. Depending on their immunogenic potential TlyA and TlyC may serve as possible vaccine candidates, especially since vaccines for an effective control of swine dysentery are currently not available.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32471432
doi: 10.1186/s12917-020-02385-5
pii: 10.1186/s12917-020-02385-5
pmc: PMC7260840
doi:
Substances chimiques
Hemolysin Proteins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
169Références
Porcine Health Manag. 2015 Jun 12;1:8
pubmed: 28694985
J Med Microbiol. 1988 Nov;27(3):215-24
pubmed: 3193444
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1992 Apr 1;71(1):109-13
pubmed: 1624107
Vet Res. 2019 Mar 7;50(1):21
pubmed: 30845993
Microb Pathog. 1994 Apr;16(4):269-82
pubmed: 7968456
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014 Feb 7;444(2):153-7
pubmed: 24434145
J Appl Microbiol. 2017 Aug;123(2):340-351
pubmed: 28510989
Am J Vet Res. 1994 Jan;55(1):67-71
pubmed: 8141499
Vet Microbiol. 2009 May 28;137(1-2):111-9
pubmed: 19179021
Biotechnol Lett. 2004 Mar;26(6):509-15
pubmed: 15127793
Infect Immun. 1994 Jun;62(6):2244-8
pubmed: 8188345
Vet Res. 2016 Jun 23;47(1):66
pubmed: 27338265
Infect Immun. 2006 Jun;74(6):3271-6
pubmed: 16714554
Infect Immun. 1981 Jan;31(1):193-8
pubmed: 7216445
Genome Biol. 2002 Jun 18;3(7):RESEARCH0034
pubmed: 12184808
Infect Immun. 1992 Feb;60(2):529-35
pubmed: 1730486
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 11;13(1):e0190928
pubmed: 29324785
PLoS One. 2010 Jul 06;5(7):e11455
pubmed: 20625514
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 22;10(6):e0131050
pubmed: 26098837
Infect Immun. 2001 Feb;69(2):706-11
pubmed: 11159958
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 04;11(8):e0160362
pubmed: 27489956
J Clin Invest. 2004 Jan;113(2):274-84
pubmed: 14722619
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2004 Nov-Dec;117(11-12):493-8
pubmed: 15584431
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999 Nov;65(11):5028-34
pubmed: 10543819
Vet Microbiol. 2014 Jan 31;168(2-4):245-60
pubmed: 24355534
Vet Res. 2017 Oct 5;48(1):59
pubmed: 28982389
PLoS One. 2009;4(3):e4641
pubmed: 19262690
Vet Microbiol. 2004 Aug 19;102(1-2):97-109
pubmed: 15288932
Vet Microbiol. 2017 Aug;207:125-132
pubmed: 28757011
BMC Biochem. 2010 Sep 20;11:35
pubmed: 20854656
J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Nov;26(11):2357-60
pubmed: 3235663
J Microbiol Methods. 2006 Aug;66(2):347-53
pubmed: 16457900
J Med Microbiol. 1982 May;15(2):205-14
pubmed: 6754943
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1996 Oct 23;1284(2):122-4
pubmed: 8962879
Infect Immun. 1977 Feb;15(2):638-46
pubmed: 844908
J Med Microbiol. 1991 Feb;34(2):97-102
pubmed: 1990146
Vet J. 2015 Jan;203(1):115-9
pubmed: 25486860
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 1;11(12):e0167424
pubmed: 27907102
Front Microbiol. 2016 Jul 21;7:1103
pubmed: 27493641
Vet Microbiol. 2012 Mar 23;155(2-4):438-43
pubmed: 22047713