Epinephrine stress testing during cardiac catheterization in patients with aortic coarctation.


Journal

American heart journal
ISSN: 1097-6744
Titre abrégé: Am Heart J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370465

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2020
Historique:
received: 22 11 2019
accepted: 07 05 2020
pubmed: 1 6 2020
medline: 17 7 2020
entrez: 1 6 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The severity of aortic coarctation (CoA) may be underestimated during cardiac catheterization. We aimed to investigate whether epinephrine stress testing improves clinical decision making and outcome in CoA. We retrospectively evaluated CoA patients >50 kg with a peak systolic gradient (PSG) ≤20 mm Hg during cardiac catheterization who underwent epinephrine stress testing. Subsequent interventional management (stenting or balloon dilatation), complications, and medium-term clinical outcome were assessed. Fifty CoA patients underwent cardiac catheterization with epinephrine stress testing. Patients with a high epinephrine PSG (>20 mm Hg; n = 24) were younger and more likely to have a hypertensive response to exercise compared to patients with a low epinephrine PSG (≤20 mm Hg; n = 26). In total, 21 patients (88%) with a high epinephrine PSG underwent intervention, and 20 patients (77%) with a low epinephrine PSG were treated conservatively. After a mean follow-up of 25 ± 18 months, there was a lower prevalence of hypertension in patients with a high epinephrine PSG who underwent intervention compared to patients with a low epinephrine PSG treated conservatively (19% vs. 76%; P = .001). In a multivariate model, intervention was independently associated with a 14.3-mm Hg reduction in systolic blood pressure (P = .001) and a decrease in the use of antihypertensive agents. In CoA patients with a low baseline PSG but high epinephrine PSG, percutaneous intervention is associated with a substantial reduction in systemic blood pressure and the use of antihypertensive medication. Accordingly, epinephrine stress testing may be a useful addition in the evaluation of CoA.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The severity of aortic coarctation (CoA) may be underestimated during cardiac catheterization. We aimed to investigate whether epinephrine stress testing improves clinical decision making and outcome in CoA.
METHODS
We retrospectively evaluated CoA patients >50 kg with a peak systolic gradient (PSG) ≤20 mm Hg during cardiac catheterization who underwent epinephrine stress testing. Subsequent interventional management (stenting or balloon dilatation), complications, and medium-term clinical outcome were assessed.
RESULTS
Fifty CoA patients underwent cardiac catheterization with epinephrine stress testing. Patients with a high epinephrine PSG (>20 mm Hg; n = 24) were younger and more likely to have a hypertensive response to exercise compared to patients with a low epinephrine PSG (≤20 mm Hg; n = 26). In total, 21 patients (88%) with a high epinephrine PSG underwent intervention, and 20 patients (77%) with a low epinephrine PSG were treated conservatively. After a mean follow-up of 25 ± 18 months, there was a lower prevalence of hypertension in patients with a high epinephrine PSG who underwent intervention compared to patients with a low epinephrine PSG treated conservatively (19% vs. 76%; P = .001). In a multivariate model, intervention was independently associated with a 14.3-mm Hg reduction in systolic blood pressure (P = .001) and a decrease in the use of antihypertensive agents.
CONCLUSIONS
In CoA patients with a low baseline PSG but high epinephrine PSG, percutaneous intervention is associated with a substantial reduction in systemic blood pressure and the use of antihypertensive medication. Accordingly, epinephrine stress testing may be a useful addition in the evaluation of CoA.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32474207
pii: S0002-8703(20)30143-5
doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.05.007
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Adrenergic beta-Agonists 0
Epinephrine YKH834O4BH

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

78-87

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Timion A Meijs (TA)

Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands. Electronic address: t.a.meijs-5@umcutrecht.nl.

Gregor J Krings (GJ)

Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Anan Saad (A)

Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Mirella M C Molenschot (MMC)

Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Pieter A Doevendans (PA)

Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Central Military Hospital, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Netherlands Heart Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Michiel Voskuil (M)

Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH