Effect of C-Reactive Protein-Guided Antibiotic Treatment Duration, 7-Day Treatment, or 14-Day Treatment on 30-Day Clinical Failure Rate in Patients With Uncomplicated Gram-Negative Bacteremia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Algorithms
Anti-Bacterial Agents
/ administration & dosage
Bacteremia
/ drug therapy
C-Reactive Protein
/ analysis
Drug Administration Schedule
Duration of Therapy
Female
Gram-Negative Bacteria
Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections
/ drug therapy
Humans
Intention to Treat Analysis
Male
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Recurrence
Regression Analysis
Treatment Failure
Journal
JAMA
ISSN: 1538-3598
Titre abrégé: JAMA
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7501160
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 06 2020
02 06 2020
Historique:
entrez:
3
6
2020
pubmed:
3
6
2020
medline:
24
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Antibiotic overuse drives antibiotic resistance. Gram-negative bacteremia is a common infection that results in substantial antibiotic use. To compare the clinical effectiveness of C-reactive protein (CRP)-guided, 7-day, and 14-day antibiotic durations 30, 60, and 90 days after treatment initiation. Multicenter, noninferiority, point-of-care randomized clinical trial including adults hospitalized with gram-negative bacteremia conducted in 3 Swiss tertiary care hospitals between April 2017 and May 2019, with follow-up until August 2019. Patients and physicians were blinded between randomization and antibiotic discontinuation. Adults (aged ≥18 years) were eligible for randomization on day 5 (±1 d) of microbiologically efficacious therapy for fermenting, gram-negative bacteria in blood culture(s) if they were afebrile for 24 hours without evidence for complicated infection (eg, abscess) or severe immunosuppression. Randomization in a 1:1:1 ratio to an individualized CRP-guided antibiotic treatment duration (discontinuation once CRP declined by 75% from peak; n = 170), fixed 7-day treatment duration (n = 169), or fixed 14-day treatment duration (n = 165). The primary outcome was the clinical failure rate at day 30, defined as the presence of at least 1 of the following, with a non-inferiority margin of 10%: recurrent bacteremia, local suppurative complication, distant complication (growth of the same organism causing the initial bacteremia), restarting gram-negative-directed antibiotic therapy due to clinical worsening suspected to be due to the initial organism, or death due to any cause. Secondary outcomes included the clinical failure rate on day 90 of follow-up. Among 504 patients randomized (median [interquartile range] age, 79 [68-86] years; 306 of 503 [61%] were women), 493 (98%) completed 30-day follow-up and 448 (89%) completed 90-day follow-up. Median antibiotic duration in the CRP group was 7 (interquartile range, 6-10; range, 5-28) days; 34 of the 164 patients (21%) who completed the 30-day follow-up had protocol violations related to treatment assignment. The primary outcome occurred in 4 of 164 (2.4%) patients in the CRP group, 11 of 166 (6.6%) in the 7-day group, and 9 of 163 (5.5%) in the 14-day group (difference in CRP vs 14-day group, -3.1% [1-sided 97.5% CI, -∞ to 1.1]; P < .001; difference in 7-day vs 14-day group, 1.1% [1-sided 97.5% CI, -∞ to 6.3]; P < .001). By day 90, clinical failure occurred in 10 of 143 patients (7.0%) in the CRP group, 16 of 151 (10.6%) in the 7-day group, and 16 of 153 (10.5%) in the 14-day group. Among adults with uncomplicated gram-negative bacteremia, 30-day rates of clinical failure for CRP-guided antibiotic treatment duration and fixed 7-day treatment were noninferior to fixed 14-day treatment. However, interpretation is limited by the large noninferiority margin compared with the low observed event rate, as well as low adherence and wide range of treatment durations in the CRP-guided group. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03101072.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32484534
pii: 2766635
doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6348
pmc: PMC7267846
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
C-Reactive Protein
9007-41-4
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03101072']
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Equivalence Trial
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2160-2169Subventions
Organisme : Swiss National Science Foundation
Pays : Switzerland
Références
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Oct;55(8):1031-46
pubmed: 22891041
Intensive Care Med. 2015 Oct;41(10):1739-51
pubmed: 26194026
Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 Jul;16(7):819-827
pubmed: 26947523
BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Jan 09;14:13
pubmed: 24405683
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1993 Nov;12(11):813-9
pubmed: 8112351
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Sep 13;69(7):1091-1098
pubmed: 30535100
Crit Care Med. 2016 Mar;44(3):e113-21
pubmed: 26901559
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013 Jun;19(6):492-500
pubmed: 23398633
BMJ Open Qual. 2018 Oct 15;7(4):e000391
pubmed: 30397661
Future Microbiol. 2018 Oct;13:1537-1547
pubmed: 30311778
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004 Aug;54(2):515-23
pubmed: 15269191
Crit Care Med. 2013 Oct;41(10):2336-43
pubmed: 23921272
Lancet. 2012 Aug 4;380(9840):484-90
pubmed: 22726802
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016 Mar;22(3):244-51
pubmed: 26577143
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Jan 6;66(2):172-177
pubmed: 29190320
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 13;7(7):e017996
pubmed: 28710229
Lancet. 2010 Feb 6;375(9713):463-74
pubmed: 20097417
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014 Sep;80(1):72-8
pubmed: 24974271