COVID-19 and cardiac arrhythmias: a global perspective on arrhythmia characteristics and management strategies.
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents
/ administration & dosage
Arrhythmias, Cardiac
/ diagnostic imaging
COVID-19
Coronavirus Infections
/ diagnosis
Cross-Sectional Studies
Electrocardiography
/ methods
Female
Humans
Incidence
Long QT Syndrome
/ diagnostic imaging
Male
Pandemics
/ prevention & control
Pneumonia, Viral
/ diagnosis
Prognosis
Severity of Illness Index
Surveys and Questionnaires
Survival Rate
Torsades de Pointes
/ diagnostic imaging
Treatment Outcome
COVID-19 Drug Treatment
Arrhythmia
COVID-19
Cardiac arrhythmia
QTc
SARS-CoV-2
Journal
Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing
ISSN: 1572-8595
Titre abrégé: J Interv Card Electrophysiol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9708966
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Nov 2020
Historique:
received:
08
05
2020
accepted:
20
05
2020
pubmed:
5
6
2020
medline:
12
11
2020
entrez:
5
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Cardiovascular and arrhythmic events have been reported in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. However, arrhythmia manifestations and treatment strategies used in these patients have not been well-described. We sought to better understand the cardiac arrhythmic manifestations and treatment strategies in hospitalized COVID-19 patients through a worldwide cross-sectional survey. The Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) sent an online survey (via SurveyMonkey) to electrophysiology (EP) professionals (physicians, scientists, and allied professionals) across the globe. The survey was active from March 27 to April 13, 2020. A total of 1197 respondents completed the survey with 50% of respondents from outside the USA, representing 76 countries and 6 continents. Of respondents, 905 (76%) reported having COVID-19-positive patients in their hospital. Atrial fibrillation was the most commonly reported tachyarrhythmia whereas severe sinus bradycardia and complete heart block were the most common bradyarrhythmias. Ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation arrest and pulseless electrical activity were reported by 4.8% and 5.6% of respondents, respectively. There were 140 of 631 (22.2%) respondents who reported using anticoagulation therapy in all COVID-19-positive patients who did not otherwise have an indication. One hundred fifty-five of 498 (31%) reported regular use of hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine (HCQ) + azithromycin (AZM); concomitant use of AZM was more common in the USA. Sixty of 489 respondents (12.3%) reported having to discontinue therapy with HCQ + AZM due to significant QTc prolongation and 20 (4.1%) reported cases of Torsade de Pointes in patients on HCQ/chloroquine and AZM. Amiodarone was the most common antiarrhythmic drug used for ventricular arrhythmia management. In this global survey of > 1100 EP professionals regarding hospitalized COVID-19 patients, a variety of arrhythmic manifestations were observed, ranging from benign to potentially life-threatening. Observed adverse events related to use of HCQ + AZM included prolonged QTc requiring drug discontinuation as well as Torsade de Pointes. Large prospective studies to better define arrhythmic manifestations as well as the safety of treatment strategies in COVID-19 patients are warranted.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Cardiovascular and arrhythmic events have been reported in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. However, arrhythmia manifestations and treatment strategies used in these patients have not been well-described. We sought to better understand the cardiac arrhythmic manifestations and treatment strategies in hospitalized COVID-19 patients through a worldwide cross-sectional survey.
METHODS
METHODS
The Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) sent an online survey (via SurveyMonkey) to electrophysiology (EP) professionals (physicians, scientists, and allied professionals) across the globe. The survey was active from March 27 to April 13, 2020.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 1197 respondents completed the survey with 50% of respondents from outside the USA, representing 76 countries and 6 continents. Of respondents, 905 (76%) reported having COVID-19-positive patients in their hospital. Atrial fibrillation was the most commonly reported tachyarrhythmia whereas severe sinus bradycardia and complete heart block were the most common bradyarrhythmias. Ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation arrest and pulseless electrical activity were reported by 4.8% and 5.6% of respondents, respectively. There were 140 of 631 (22.2%) respondents who reported using anticoagulation therapy in all COVID-19-positive patients who did not otherwise have an indication. One hundred fifty-five of 498 (31%) reported regular use of hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine (HCQ) + azithromycin (AZM); concomitant use of AZM was more common in the USA. Sixty of 489 respondents (12.3%) reported having to discontinue therapy with HCQ + AZM due to significant QTc prolongation and 20 (4.1%) reported cases of Torsade de Pointes in patients on HCQ/chloroquine and AZM. Amiodarone was the most common antiarrhythmic drug used for ventricular arrhythmia management.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
In this global survey of > 1100 EP professionals regarding hospitalized COVID-19 patients, a variety of arrhythmic manifestations were observed, ranging from benign to potentially life-threatening. Observed adverse events related to use of HCQ + AZM included prolonged QTc requiring drug discontinuation as well as Torsade de Pointes. Large prospective studies to better define arrhythmic manifestations as well as the safety of treatment strategies in COVID-19 patients are warranted.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32494896
doi: 10.1007/s10840-020-00789-9
pii: 10.1007/s10840-020-00789-9
pmc: PMC7268965
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
329-336Références
Nature. 2020 Mar;579(7798):270-273
pubmed: 32015507
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 May;31(5):1003-1008
pubmed: 32270559
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 28;71(15):732-739
pubmed: 32150618
Biosci Trends. 2020 Mar 16;14(1):72-73
pubmed: 32074550
JAMA. 2020 May 12;323(18):1775-1776
pubmed: 32203977
Nat Med. 2020 Jun;26(6):808-809
pubmed: 32488217
Chin Med J (Engl). 2020 May 5;133(9):1025-1031
pubmed: 32044814
JAMA. 2020 Mar 17;323(11):1061-1069
pubmed: 32031570
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Jul 1;5(7):811-818
pubmed: 32219356
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Jul 1;5(7):802-810
pubmed: 32211816
Med Mal Infect. 2020 Jun;50(4):384
pubmed: 32240719