Reliability of the mixing ability test testing masticatory performance in patients with head and neck cancer and healthy controls.
chewing
head and neck cancer
mastication
mixing ability test
oral health
reliability
Journal
Journal of oral rehabilitation
ISSN: 1365-2842
Titre abrégé: J Oral Rehabil
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0433604
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2020
Aug 2020
Historique:
received:
29
01
2020
revised:
11
05
2020
accepted:
24
05
2020
pubmed:
5
6
2020
medline:
22
7
2020
entrez:
5
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Treatment of patients with head and neck cancer can result in disrupted mastication. To measure masticatory performance in people with compromised mastication, the mixing ability test (MAT) was developed. In this study, the reliability of the MAT was evaluated in patients with head and neck cancer and healthy controls. Thirty-four patients with head and neck cancer and 42 healthy controls performed the MAT twice on the same day. To assess reliability, the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC A good (ICC = 0.886) and moderate correlation (ICC = 0.525) were found for patients and healthy controls, respectively. Patients had a worse mixing ability (mean = 19.12, SD = 4.56) in comparison with healthy controls (mean = 16.42, SD = 2.04). The SEM was 0.76 in patients and 1.45 in healthy controls, with a SDC of 2.12 and 4.02, respectively. The LoA was -4.46 to 4.42 in patients and -3.65 to 4.59 in healthy controls. The MAT has a good reliability in patients with head and neck cancer and a moderate reliability in healthy controls.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Treatment of patients with head and neck cancer can result in disrupted mastication. To measure masticatory performance in people with compromised mastication, the mixing ability test (MAT) was developed.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
In this study, the reliability of the MAT was evaluated in patients with head and neck cancer and healthy controls.
METHODS
METHODS
Thirty-four patients with head and neck cancer and 42 healthy controls performed the MAT twice on the same day. To assess reliability, the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC
RESULTS
RESULTS
A good (ICC = 0.886) and moderate correlation (ICC = 0.525) were found for patients and healthy controls, respectively. Patients had a worse mixing ability (mean = 19.12, SD = 4.56) in comparison with healthy controls (mean = 16.42, SD = 2.04). The SEM was 0.76 in patients and 1.45 in healthy controls, with a SDC of 2.12 and 4.02, respectively. The LoA was -4.46 to 4.42 in patients and -3.65 to 4.59 in healthy controls.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The MAT has a good reliability in patients with head and neck cancer and a moderate reliability in healthy controls.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32495364
doi: 10.1111/joor.13029
pmc: PMC7497093
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
961-966Subventions
Organisme : KWF Kankerbestrijding
ID : 2013-5930
Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Oct;46(10):1229-1236
pubmed: 28579265
Head Neck. 2011 Jul;33(7):1013-20
pubmed: 20967870
BMC Cancer. 2019 Aug 5;19(1):765
pubmed: 31382921
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016 Sep;44(9):1408-13
pubmed: 27377999
Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2019 Feb;31(1):31-38
pubmed: 30454789
Surg Oncol. 2018 Sep;27(3):490-494
pubmed: 30217307
Arch Oral Biol. 2017 Nov;83:105-110
pubmed: 28750270
J Strength Cond Res. 2005 Feb;19(1):231-40
pubmed: 15705040
J Oral Rehabil. 2016 Aug;43(8):630-48
pubmed: 27061099
J Oral Rehabil. 2017 Apr;44(4):299-312
pubmed: 28029687
Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10
pubmed: 2868172
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2019 Jan 31;5(1):76-104
pubmed: 30847236
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Jun;18 Suppl 3:34-45
pubmed: 17594368
Physiol Behav. 2018 Feb 1;184:220-225
pubmed: 29217358
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 5;13(9):e0203591
pubmed: 30183763
J Oral Rehabil. 2018 Oct;45(10):790-797
pubmed: 29972243
J Oral Rehabil. 2019 Feb;46(2):140-150
pubmed: 30311256
Periodontol 2000. 2011 Oct;57(1):102-17
pubmed: 21781182
J Oral Rehabil. 2012 Jan;39(1):11-7
pubmed: 21707695
Stat Med. 1998 Jan 15;17(1):101-10
pubmed: 9463853
Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8
pubmed: 18839484
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):34-42
pubmed: 17161752
J Oral Rehabil. 2020 Aug;47(8):961-966
pubmed: 32495364
Front Aging Neurosci. 2017 Apr 03;9:82
pubmed: 28420981
Arch Oral Biol. 2014 Dec;59(12):1342-51
pubmed: 25193315
Head Neck. 2008 May;30(5):622-30
pubmed: 18213726
Eur J Oral Sci. 2009 Oct;117(5):580-6
pubmed: 19758256
J Oral Rehabil. 2020 Apr;47(4):460-466
pubmed: 31785007
Physiol Behav. 2006 Aug 30;89(1):22-7
pubmed: 16564557
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1171-1179
pubmed: 29260445
Clin Otolaryngol. 2010 Aug;35(4):270-2
pubmed: 20738334