Correlations between joint kinematics and dynamic balance control during gait in pregnancy.


Journal

Gait & posture
ISSN: 1879-2219
Titre abrégé: Gait Posture
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9416830

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2020
Historique:
received: 30 01 2020
revised: 01 05 2020
accepted: 18 05 2020
pubmed: 6 6 2020
medline: 13 4 2021
entrez: 6 6 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Dynamic balance control degrades during pregnancy, but it is not yet understood why. Mechanical aspects of the body should directly affect walking balance control, but we have recently published papers indicating that weight gains during pregnancy explain very little dynamic balance changes. Our goal was to determine if lower extremity joint kinematic changes are an indicator of walking balance control. This information is vital to understanding the route by which pregnancy increases fall risk. Twenty-three pregnant women were tested at five different times in the 2nd and 3rd trimesters of pregnancy. Participants performed walking trials at a self-selected pace. Motion capture was used to measure joint kinematics (discrete and coordination variables) and body center of mass motion. Changes over time were statistically analyzed. Correlations between kinematics and walking balance were modelled with hierarchical multiple regression models. As pregnancy progresses, it appears that a more flexed hip posture could be driving lower extremity kinematic changes toward increased coordination between joints and increased knee and ankle motions. Walking balance changes were also detected through increased COM motion (lateral range of motion and velocity) in the lateral directions. However, there was little correlation between kinematic and balance changes (r Our findings suggest that walking balance control is not altered by a common kinematic change between all pregnant women. While increased lateral center of mass motion should be expected with pregnancy, the kinematics leading to this increase may be person-specific. The cause of dynamic imbalance in each pregnant women (physiological, mechanical, and neurocognitive) may play an important role in determining the kinematic means by which lateral center of mass motion increases.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Dynamic balance control degrades during pregnancy, but it is not yet understood why. Mechanical aspects of the body should directly affect walking balance control, but we have recently published papers indicating that weight gains during pregnancy explain very little dynamic balance changes. Our goal was to determine if lower extremity joint kinematic changes are an indicator of walking balance control. This information is vital to understanding the route by which pregnancy increases fall risk.
METHODS
Twenty-three pregnant women were tested at five different times in the 2nd and 3rd trimesters of pregnancy. Participants performed walking trials at a self-selected pace. Motion capture was used to measure joint kinematics (discrete and coordination variables) and body center of mass motion. Changes over time were statistically analyzed. Correlations between kinematics and walking balance were modelled with hierarchical multiple regression models.
RESULTS
As pregnancy progresses, it appears that a more flexed hip posture could be driving lower extremity kinematic changes toward increased coordination between joints and increased knee and ankle motions. Walking balance changes were also detected through increased COM motion (lateral range of motion and velocity) in the lateral directions. However, there was little correlation between kinematic and balance changes (r
SIGNIFICANCE
Our findings suggest that walking balance control is not altered by a common kinematic change between all pregnant women. While increased lateral center of mass motion should be expected with pregnancy, the kinematics leading to this increase may be person-specific. The cause of dynamic imbalance in each pregnant women (physiological, mechanical, and neurocognitive) may play an important role in determining the kinematic means by which lateral center of mass motion increases.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32502792
pii: S0966-6362(20)30175-2
doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.05.025
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

106-112

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Robert D Catena (RD)

Washington State University, 101 Physical Education Building, Pullman, WA, United States. Electronic address: robert.catena@wsu.edu.

Joshua P Bailey (JP)

University of Idaho, 875 Perimeter Drive MS 2401, Moscow, ID, United States.

Nigel Campbell (N)

Moscow/Pullman OBGYN, 1205 SE Professional Mall Blvd #102, Pullman, WA, United States.

Brett C Stewart (BC)

Washington State University, 101 Physical Education Building, Pullman, WA, United States.

Shawn J Marion (SJ)

Washington State University, 101 Physical Education Building, Pullman, WA, United States.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH