A bundled intervention lowers surgical site infection in hysterectomy for benign and malignant indications.
Hysterectomy
Minimally invasive surgery
Patient care bundles
Postoperative complications
Quality improvement
Surgical site infection
Journal
International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics
ISSN: 1879-3479
Titre abrégé: Int J Gynaecol Obstet
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0210174
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Sep 2020
Historique:
received:
14
08
2019
revised:
22
01
2020
accepted:
01
06
2020
pubmed:
9
6
2020
medline:
9
3
2021
entrez:
8
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate the impact of a surgical site infection (SSI) prevention bundle on SSI rates after hysterectomy for benign and malignant indications at an urban academic medical center. The bundled invention was implemented for all abdominal gynecologic surgeries at Prentice Women's Hospital, Chicago, USA, from August 2016 to January 2017, and officially incorporated in department-wide policy from February 1, 2017. SSI data were prospectively collected for any open, vaginal, laparoscopic, or robotic hysterectomy for benign or malignant indications performed from February 2017 to January 2018. A retrospective review of all hysterectomies performed from February 2015 to January 2016 was conducted to establish baseline pre-bundle SSI data. Among 532 hysterectomies performed post-bundle implementation, there were two SSIs. By contrast, there were 14 SSIs among 515 hysterectomies in the same period before bundle implementation, representing a decrease in SSI rate from 2.7% to 0.4% (odds ratio, 7.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.67-32.75). The two SSIs in the post-bundle period occurred in open hysterectomies, whereas 8 (57.1%) SSIs in the pre-bundle period occurred in minimally invasive hysterectomies. An SSI prevention bundle was effective for reducing the SSI rate in hysterectomy for both benign and malignant indications.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
392-397Informations de copyright
© 2020 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
Références
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Surgical site infection (SSI) 2012. https://www.cdc.gov/HAI/ssi/ssi.html. Accessed November 12, 2018.
Anderson DJ, Podgorny K, Berríos-Torres SI, et al. Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014;35:605-627.
Bratzler DW, Hunt DR. The surgical infection prevention and surgical care improvement projects: National initiatives to improve outcomes for patients having surgery. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43:322-330.
Stulberg JJ, Delaney CP, Neuhauser DV, Aron DC, Fu P, Koroukian SM. Adherence to surgical care improvement project measures and the association with postoperative infections. J Am Med Assoc. 2010;303:2479-2485.
Waits SA, Fritze D, Banerjee M, et al. Developing an argument for bundled interventions to reduce surgical site infection in colorectal surgery. Surgery. 2014;155:602-606.
Lake AG, McPencow AM, Dick-Biascoechea MA, Martin DK, Erekson EA. Surgical site infection after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209:490.e1-490.e9.
Roy S, Patkar A, Daskiran M, Levine R, Hinoul P, Nigam S. Clinical and economic burden of surgical site infection in hysterectomy. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2014;15:266-273.
Merkow RP, Ju MH, Chung JW, et al. Underlying reasons associated with hospital readmission following surgery in the United States. JAMA. 2015;313:483.
Webster J, Osborne S. Preoperative bathing or showering with skin antiseptics to prevent surgical site infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;CD00498.
Culligan PJ, Kubik K, Murphy M, Blackwell L, Snyder J. A randomized trial that compared povidone iodine and chlorhexidine as antiseptics for vaginal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:422-425.
Mihaljevic AL, Müller TC, Kehl V, Friess H, Kleeff J. Wound edge protectors in open abdominal surgery to reduce surgical site infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10:1-25.
Ward WG, Cooper JM, Lippert D, Kablawi RO, Neiberg RH, Sherertz RJ. Glove and gown effects on intraoperative bacterial contamination. Ann Surg. 2014;259:591-597.
Kwaan MR, Weight CJ, Carda SJ, et al. Abdominal closure protocol in colorectal, gynecologic oncology, and urology procedures: A randomized quality improvement trial. Am J Surg. 2016;211:1077-1083.
Pada S, Perl TM. Operating room myths: What is the evidence for common practices. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2015;28:369-374.
ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins. ACOG practice bulletin no. 104: Antibiotic prophylaxis for gynecologic procedures. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;113:1180-1189.
Turner LC, Shepherd JP, Wang L, Bunker CH, Lowder JL. Hysterectomy surgical trends: A more accurate depiction of the last decade? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208:277.e1-277.e7.
Tanner J, Padley W, Assadian O, Leaper D, Kiernan M, Edmiston C. Do surgical care bundles reduce the risk of surgical site infections in patients undergoing colorectal surgery? A systematic review and cohort meta-analysis of 8,515 patients. Surgery. 2015;158:66-77.
Harris JA, Sammarco AG, Swenson CW, et al. Are perioperative bundles associated with reduced postoperative morbidity in women undergoing benign hysterectomy? Retrospective cohort analysis of 16,286 cases in Michigan. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216:502.e1-502.e11.
Taylor JS, Marten CA, Munsell MF, et al. The DISINFECT Initiative: Decreasing the incidence of surgical INFECTions in gynecologic oncology. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:362-368.
Ju MH, Ko CY, Hall BL, Bosk CL, Bilimoria KY, Wick EC. A Comparison of 2 surgical site infection monitoring systems. JAMA Surg. 2015;150:51.
Atchley KD, Pappas JM, Kennedy AT, et al. Use of administrative data for surgical site infection surveillance after congenital cardiac surgery results in inaccurate reporting of surgical site infection rates. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;97:651-658.
Lawson EH, Louie R, Zingmond DS, et al. A comparison of clinical registry versus administrative claims data for reporting of 30-day surgical complications. Ann Surg. 2012;256:973-981.
Lippitt MH, Fairbairn MG, Matsuno R, et al. Outcomes associated with a five-point surgical site infection prevention bundle in women undergoing surgery for ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130:756-764.
Andiman SE, Xu X, Boyce JM, et al. Decreased surgical site infection rate in hysterectomy: Effect of a gynecology-specific bundle. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131:991-999.
Bruce SF, Carr DN, Burton ER, et al. Implementation of an abdominal closure bundle to reduce surgical site infection in patients on a gynecologic oncology service undergoing exploratory laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2018;149:560-564.