Continuous Wound Infiltration With Ropivacaine After Mastectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.


Journal

The Journal of surgical research
ISSN: 1095-8673
Titre abrégé: J Surg Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0376340

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 2020
Historique:
received: 04 11 2019
revised: 23 04 2020
accepted: 03 05 2020
pubmed: 9 6 2020
medline: 3 11 2020
entrez: 9 6 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To evaluate the efficacy of continuous wound infiltration with ropivacaine to reduce acute postoperative pain in patients undergoing mastectomy for carcinoma of the breast. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted. One hundred fifty patients were randomly assigned to receive continuous ropivacaine (0.2%) (group A, n = 74) or saline solution (0.9%) (group B, n = 76) at 10 mL/h for 48 h through a multilumen catheter placed during the surgical procedure. Postoperative morphine consumption and visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores were recorded. A quality of life score (Quality of life questionnaire Core 30) and a VAS score were obtained at 1, 3, and 6 mo after surgery. The difference in mean morphine consumption between the two groups was close to significance during the first 48 h postsurgery (P = 0.056; 10.8 ± 16.5 versus 4.8 ± 10.4 mg). At day 1, patients in the ropivacaine-infusion group had lower morphine consumption than the control group (P = 0.0026). The link between local ropivacaine infiltration and a decrease in mean postoperative VAS scores reached significance for the first 24 h postsurgery (P = 0.039). No significant difference was found between the two arms for VAS pain scores (P = 0.36) or for quality of life (overall QLQ-C30 score, P = 0.09) at 1, 3, or 6 mo. Continuous wound infiltration with ropivacaine is efficacious in reducing postoperative pain. Quality of life and chronic pain at 1, 3, and 6 mo were not improved by ropivacaine wound infiltration.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
To evaluate the efficacy of continuous wound infiltration with ropivacaine to reduce acute postoperative pain in patients undergoing mastectomy for carcinoma of the breast.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted. One hundred fifty patients were randomly assigned to receive continuous ropivacaine (0.2%) (group A, n = 74) or saline solution (0.9%) (group B, n = 76) at 10 mL/h for 48 h through a multilumen catheter placed during the surgical procedure. Postoperative morphine consumption and visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores were recorded. A quality of life score (Quality of life questionnaire Core 30) and a VAS score were obtained at 1, 3, and 6 mo after surgery.
RESULTS
The difference in mean morphine consumption between the two groups was close to significance during the first 48 h postsurgery (P = 0.056; 10.8 ± 16.5 versus 4.8 ± 10.4 mg). At day 1, patients in the ropivacaine-infusion group had lower morphine consumption than the control group (P = 0.0026). The link between local ropivacaine infiltration and a decrease in mean postoperative VAS scores reached significance for the first 24 h postsurgery (P = 0.039). No significant difference was found between the two arms for VAS pain scores (P = 0.36) or for quality of life (overall QLQ-C30 score, P = 0.09) at 1, 3, or 6 mo.
CONCLUSIONS
Continuous wound infiltration with ropivacaine is efficacious in reducing postoperative pain. Quality of life and chronic pain at 1, 3, and 6 mo were not improved by ropivacaine wound infiltration.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32512380
pii: S0022-4804(20)30266-3
doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.05.006
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Anesthetics, Local 0
Ropivacaine 7IO5LYA57N

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

318-326

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Marie Beguinot (M)

Département d'oncologie, Médipôle Hôpital Mutualiste Lyon Villeurbanne, Villeurbanne, France.

Emilie Monrigal (E)

Département de Chirurgie Sénologique, Montpellier Institut du Sein, Clinique Clémentville, Montpellier, France.

Fabrice Kwiatkowski (F)

Délégation Recherche Clinique & Innovation, Centre Jean Perrin, Centre de Lutte contre le Cancer, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Angeline Ginzac (A)

Délégation Recherche Clinique & Innovation, Centre Jean Perrin, Centre de Lutte contre le Cancer, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Université Clermont Auvergne, Centre Jean Perrin, INSERM, U1240 Imagerie Moléculaire et Stratégies Théranostiques, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Centre d'Investigation Clinique, UMR501, Clermont-Ferrand, France. Electronic address: Angeline.ginzac@clermont.unicancer.fr.

Dominique Joly (D)

Département d'anesthésie-réanimation, Centre Jean Perrin, Centre de Lutte contre le Cancer, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Guillaume Gayraud (G)

Département d'anesthésie-réanimation, Centre Jean Perrin, Centre de Lutte contre le Cancer, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Guillaume Le Bouedec (G)

Département de Chirurgie Oncologique, Centre Jean Perrin, Centre de Lutte contre le Cancer, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Pierre Gimbergues (P)

Département de Chirurgie Oncologique, Centre Jean Perrin, Centre de Lutte contre le Cancer, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH