A registered replication study on oxytocin and trust.
Journal
Nature human behaviour
ISSN: 2397-3374
Titre abrégé: Nat Hum Behav
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101697750
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2020
06 2020
Historique:
received:
22
03
2018
accepted:
01
04
2020
pubmed:
10
6
2020
medline:
21
10
2020
entrez:
10
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In an influential paper, Kosfeld et al. (2005) showed that intranasal administration of oxytocin (OT) increases the transfers made by investors in the trust game-suggesting that OT increases trust in strangers. Subsequent studies investigating the role of OT in the trust game found inconclusive effects on the trusting behaviour of investors but these studies deviated from the Kosfeld et al. study in an important way-they did not implement minimal social contact (MSC) between the investors and the trustees in the trust game. Here, we performed a large double-blind and placebo-controlled replication study of the effects of OT on trusting behaviour that yields a power of more than 95% and implements an MSC condition as well as a no-social-contact (NoC) condition. We find no effect of OT on trusting behaviour in the MSC condition. Exploratory post hoc analyses suggest that OT may increase trust in individuals with a low disposition to trust in the NoC condition, but this finding requires confirmation in future research. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: The stage 1 protocol for this Registered Report was accepted in principle on 19 October 2018. The protocol, as accepted by the journal, can be found at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.11980368.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32514040
doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0878-x
pii: 10.1038/s41562-020-0878-x
doi:
Substances chimiques
Oxytocin
50-56-6
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
646-655Références
Insel, T. R. & Young, L. J. The neurobiology of attachment. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 129–136 (2001).
pubmed: 11252992
doi: 10.1038/35053579
Johnson, Z. V. & Young, L. J. Neurobiological mechanisms of social attachment and pair bonding. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 3, 38–44 (2015).
pubmed: 26146650
pmcid: 4486624
doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.01.009
Carter, C. S. Neuroendocrine perspectives on social attachment and love. Psychoneuroendocrinology 23, 779–818 (1998).
pubmed: 9924738
doi: 10.1016/S0306-4530(98)00055-9
Heinrichs, M., Baumgartner, T., Kirschbaum, C. & Ehlert, U. Social support and oxytocin interact to suppress cortisol and subjective responses to psychosocial stress. Biol. Psychiatry 54, 1389–1398 (2003).
pubmed: 14675803
doi: 10.1016/S0006-3223(03)00465-7
Norman, G. J. et al. Oxytocin increases autonomic cardiac control: moderation by loneliness. Biol. Psychol. 86, 174–180 (2011).
pubmed: 21126557
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.11.006
Kirsch, P. Oxytocin modulates neural circuitry for social cognition and fear in humans. J. Neurosci. 25, 11489–11493 (2005).
pubmed: 16339042
pmcid: 6725903
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3984-05.2005
Lambert, B., Declerck, C. H., Boone, C. & Parizel, P. M. A functional MRI study on how oxytocin affects decision making in social dilemmas: cooperate as long as it pays off, aggress only when you think you can win. Horm. Behav. 94, 145–152 (2017).
pubmed: 28676252
doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2017.06.011
Kosfeld, M., Heinrichs, M., Zak, P. J., Fischbacher, U. & Fehr, E. Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature 435, 673–676 (2005).
pubmed: 15931222
doi: 10.1038/nature03701
Bohnet, I., Greig, F., Herrmann, B. & Zeckhauser, R. Betrayal aversion: evidence from Brazil, China, Oman, Switzerland, Turkey, and the United States. Am. Econ. Rev. 98, 294–310 (2008).
doi: 10.1257/aer.98.1.294
Fehr, E. On the economics and biology of trust. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 7, 235–266 (2009).
doi: 10.1162/JEEA.2009.7.2-3.235
Heinrichs, M., von Dawans, B. & Domes, G. Oxytocin, vasopressin, and human social behavior. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 30, 548–557 (2009).
pubmed: 19505497
doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2009.05.005
Meyer‐Lindenberg, A., Domes, G., Kirsch, P. & Heinrichs, M. Oxytocin and vasopressin in the human brain: social neuropeptides for translational medicine. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 12, 524–538 (2011).
pubmed: 21852800
doi: 10.1038/nrn3044
van IJzendoorn, M. H. & Bakermans‐Kranenburg, M. J. The role of oxytocin in parenting and as augmentative pharmacotherapy: critical issues and bold conjectures. J. Neuroendocrinol. https://doi.org/10.1111/jne.12355 (2016).
Hurlemann, R. et al. Oxytocin enhances amygdala‐dependent, socially reinforced learning and emotional empathy in humans. J. Neurosci. 30, 4999–5007 (2010).
pubmed: 20371820
pmcid: 6632777
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5538-09.2010
Hurlemann, R. & Marsh, N. Deciphering the modulatory role of oxytocin in human altruism. Rev. Neurosci. 28, 335–342 (2017).
pubmed: 28301323
doi: 10.1515/revneuro-2016-0061
De Dreu, C. K. W. Oxytocin modulates cooperation within and competition between groups: an integrative review and research agenda. Horm. Behav. 61, 419–428 (2012).
pubmed: 22227278
doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.12.009
De Dreu, C. K. W. & Kret, M. E. Oxytocin conditions intergroup relations through upregulated in group empathy, cooperation, conformity, and defense. Biol. Psychiatry 79, 165–173 (2016).
pubmed: 25908497
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.03.020
Walum, H., Waldman, I. D. & Young, L. J. Statistical and methodological considerations for the interpretation of intranasal oxytocin studies. Biol. Psychiatry 79, 251–257 (2016).
pubmed: 26210057
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.06.016
Lane, A., Luminet, O., Nave, G. & Mikolajczak, M. Is there a publication bias in behavioural intranasal oxytocin research on humans? Opening the file drawer of one Laboratory. J. Neuroendocrinol. https://doi.org/10.1111/jne.12384 (2016).
Churchland, P. S. & Winkielman, P. Modulating social behavior with oxytocin: how does it work? What does it mean? Horm. Behav. 61, 392–399 (2012).
pubmed: 22197271
doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.12.003
Nave, G., Camerer, C. & McCullough, M. Does oxytocin increase trust in humans? A critical review of research. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 10, 772–789 (2015).
pubmed: 26581735
doi: 10.1177/1745691615600138
Ross, H. E. & Young, L. J. Oxytocin and the neural mechanisms regulating social cognition and affiliative behavior. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 30, 534–547 (2009).
pubmed: 19481567
pmcid: 2748133
doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2009.05.004
Young, L. J. & Wang, Z. The neurobiology of pair bonding. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 1048–1054 (2004).
pubmed: 15452576
doi: 10.1038/nn1327
Balliet, D. Communication and cooperation in social dilemmas: a meta‐analytic review. J. Confl. Resolut. 54, 39–57 (2009).
doi: 10.1177/0022002709352443
Ebert, A. et al. Modulation of interpersonal trust in borderline personality disorder by intranasal oxytocin and childhood trauma. Soc. Neurosci. 8, 305–313 (2013).
pubmed: 23802121
doi: 10.1080/17470919.2013.807301
Klackl, J., Pfundmair, M., Agroskin, D. & Jonas, E. Who is to blame? Oxytocin promotes nonpersonalistic attributions in response to a trust betrayal. Biol. Psychol. 92, 387–394 (2013).
pubmed: 23201035
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.11.010
Mikolajczak, M. et al. Oxytocin makes people trusting, not gullible. Psychol. Sci. 21, 1072–1074 (2010).
pubmed: 20631321
doi: 10.1177/0956797610377343
Yao, S. et al. Oxytocin makes females, but not males, less forgiving following betrayal of trust. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 17, 1785–1792 (2014).
pubmed: 24916520
doi: 10.1017/S146114571400090X
Baumgartner, T., Heinrichs, M., Vonlanthen, A., Fischbacher, U. & Fehr, E. Oxytocin shapes the neural circuitry of trust and trust adaptation in humans. Neuron 58, 639–650 (2008).
pubmed: 18498743
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.009
Barraza, J. A. The physiology of empathy: linking oxytocin to empathic responding. Diss. Abstr. Int. Sect. B Sci. Eng. 71, 4537 (2011).
Declerck, C. H., Boone, C. & Kiyonari, T. Oxytocin and cooperation under conditions of uncertainty: the modulating role of incentives and social information. Horm. Behav. 57, 368–374 (2010).
pubmed: 20080100
doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2010.01.006
Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. et al. Intranasal administration of oxytocin increases envy and schadenfreude (gloating). Biol. Psychiatry 66, 864–870 (2009).
pubmed: 19640508
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.06.009
Bartz, J. A., Zaki, J., Bolger, N. & Ochsner, K. N. Social effects of oxytocin in humans: context and person matter. Trends Cogn. Sci. 15, 301–309 (2011).
pubmed: 21696997
Olff, M. et al. The role of oxytocin in social bonding, stress regulation and mental health: an update on the moderating effects of context and interindividual differences. Psychoneuroendocrinology 38, 1883–1894 (2013).
pubmed: 23856187
doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.06.019
Love, T. M. Oxytocin, motivation and the role of dopamine. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 119, 49–60 (2014).
pubmed: 23850525
doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2013.06.011
Shamay‐Tsoory, S. G. & Abu‐Akel, A. The social salience hypothesis of oxytocin. Biol. Psychiatry 79, 194–202 (2016).
pubmed: 26321019
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.07.020
Yamagishi, T. et al. Two‐component model of general trust: predicting behavioral trust from attitudinal trust. Soc. Cogn. 33, 436–458 (2015).
doi: 10.1521/soco.2015.33.5.436
Aron, A., Aron, E. N. & Smollan, D. Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 63, 596–612 (1992).
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596
Gächter, S., Starmer, C. & Tufano, F. Revealing the Economic Consequences of Group Cohesion. CEDEX Discussion Paper 2017-09 (Univ. Nottingham, 2017).
Berg, J., Dickhaut, J. & McCabe, K. Trust, reciprocity and social history. Games Econ. Behav. 10, 122–142 (1995).
doi: 10.1006/game.1995.1027
Tabak, B. A. et al. Null results of oxytocin and vasopressin administration across a range of social cognitive and behavioral paradigms: evidence from a randomized controlled trial (2019). Psychoneuroendocriniology 107, 124–132 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2019.04.019
Wang, Y., Wang, M. J., Rong, Y., He, H. Z. & Yang, C. J. Oxytocin therapy for core symptoms in autism spectrum disorder: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Res. Autism Spectr. Dis. 64, 63–75 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2019.03.007
Piva, M. & Chang, S. W. C. An integrated framework for the role of oxytocin in multistage social decision-making. Am. J. Primatol. 80, e22735 (2018).
pubmed: 29350419
pmcid: 6053333
doi: 10.1002/ajp.22735
Sawilowski, S. S. New effect size rules of thumb. J. Mod. Appl. Stat. Methods 8, 26 (2009).
Cho, H. & Abe, S. Is two-tailed testing for directional research hypotheses tests legitimate? J. Bus. Res. 66, 1261–1266 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.02.023
Simonsohn, U. Small telescopes: detectability and the evaluation of replication results. Psychol. Sci. 26, 559–569 (2015).
pubmed: 25800521
doi: 10.1177/0956797614567341
MacDonald, K. S. Sex, receptors, and attachment: a review of individual factors influencing response to oxytocin. Front. Neurosci. 6, 194 (2013).
pubmed: 23335876
pmcid: 3541513
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2012.00194
Van Zijl., F. V. W., Timman, R. & Datema, F. R. Adaptation and validation of the Dutch version of the nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) scale. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolary. 274, 2469–2476 (2017).
doi: 10.1007/s00405-017-4486-y
Lipan, M. J. & Most, S. P. Development of a severity classification system for subjective nasal obstruction. JAMA Facial Plast. Surg. 15, 358–361 (2013).
pubmed: 23846399
doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2013.344
Teixeira, R. U. F., Zappelini, C. E. M., Oliveira, L. G., Basile, L. C. G. & Costa, E. A. Correlation between the peak nasal inspiratory flow and the visual analogue scale (VAS) before and after using a nasal decongestant. Int. Arch. Otorhinolary. 15, 156–162 (2011).
Hsu, H. C. et al. Evaluation of nasal patency by visual analogue scale/nasal obstruction symptom evaluation questionnaires and anterior active rhinomanometry after septoplasty: a retrospective one-year follow-up cohort study. Clin. Otolaryngol. 42, 53–59 (2016).
pubmed: 27102375
doi: 10.1111/coa.12662
Ten Velden, F. S., Daughters, K. & De Dreu, C. K. W. Oxytocin promotes intuitive rather than deliberated cooperation with the in‐group. Horm. Behav. 92, 164–171 (2017).
pubmed: 27288835
doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2016.06.005
Fischbacher, U. z‐Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready‐made economic experiments. Exp. Econ. 10, 171–178 (2007).
doi: 10.1007/s10683-006-9159-4
Van Lange, P. A. M. Beyond self‐interest: a set of propositions relevant to interpersonal orientations. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 11, 297–331 (2000).
doi: 10.1080/14792772043000068
Boone, C., Declerck, C. H. & Kiyonari, T. Inducing cooperative behavior among proselfs versus prosocials: the moderating role of incentives and trust. J. Confl. Resolut. 54, 799–824 (2010).
doi: 10.1177/0022002710372329
Spengler, F. B. et al. Kinetics and dose dependency of intranasal oxytocin effects on amygdala reactivity. Biol. Psychiatry 82, 885–894 (2017).
pubmed: 28629540
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.04.015
Quintana, D. S. et al. Low dose intranasal oxytocin delivered with breath powered device dampens amygdala response to emotional stimuli: a peripheral effect-controlled within-subject randomized dose-response fMRI trial. Psychoneuroendocrinology 69, 180–188 (2016).
pubmed: 27107209
doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2016.04.010
Quintana, D. S., Guastella, A. J., Westlye, L. T. & Andreassen, O. A. The promose and pitfalls of intranasally administering psychopharmacological agents for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. Mol. Psychiatry 21, 29–38 (2016).
pubmed: 26552590
doi: 10.1038/mp.2015.166
Guastella, A. J. et al. Recommendations for the standardisation of oxytocin nasal administration and guidelines for its reporting in human research. Psychoneuroendocrinology 38, 612–625 (2013).
pubmed: 23265311
doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.11.019
Falk, A., Becker, A., Dohmen, T., Huffman, D. & Sunde, U. The Preference Survey module: A Validated Instrument for Measuring Risk, Time, and Social preferences Discussion Paper Series 9674 (IZA, 2016).
Auyeung, A. C. & Baron-Cohen, S. Toward brief ‘red flags’ for autism screening: the short autism spectrum quotient and the short quantitative checklist for autism in toddlers in 1,000 cases and 3,000 controls. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 51, 202–212 (2012).
pubmed: 22265366
doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2011.11.003
Lee, K. & Ashton, M. C. Psychometric Properties of the HEXACO‐100. Assessment 25, 543–556 (2018).
pubmed: 27411678
doi: 10.1177/1073191116659134
Steyer, R., Schwenkmezger, P., Notz, P. & Eid, M. Der Mehrdimensionale Befindlichkeitsfragebogen (MDBF). (Hogrefe, 1997).
Suk, H.-J. & Irtel, H. Color and emotion: a study on the affective judgment of color across media and in relation to visual stimuli. Dissertation, University of Mannheim (2006).
Dieleman, G. C., van der Ende, J., Verhulst, F. C. & Huizink, A. C. Perceived and physiological arousal during a stress task: Can they differentiate between anxiety and depression? Psychoneuroendocrinology 35, 1223–1234 (2010).
pubmed: 20219286
doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.02.012
Quintana, D. S. & Willams, D. R. Bayesian alternatives for common null-hypothesis significance tests in psychiatry: a non-technical guide using JASP. BMC Psychiatry 18, 178 (2018).
pubmed: 29879931
pmcid: 5991426
doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1761-4
Shönbrodt, F. D. & Wagenmakers, E. Bayes factor design analysis: planning for compelling evidence. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 25, 128–142 (2018).
doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1230-y
Jeffreys, H. The Theory of Probability (Oxford Univ. Press, 1961).