Who responds? An examination of response rates to a national postal survey of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults, 2018-2019.
Aboriginal
Indigenous
Torres Strait Islander
cohort
postal surveys
recruitment
response rates
Journal
BMC medical research methodology
ISSN: 1471-2288
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Res Methodol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968545
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 06 2020
10 06 2020
Historique:
received:
20
12
2019
accepted:
05
04
2020
entrez:
12
6
2020
pubmed:
12
6
2020
medline:
25
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Evidence on the effectiveness of postal recruitment methods for Indigenous peoples is lacking. Mayi Kuwayu, the National Study of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Wellbeing, uses multi-staged sampling. We aimed to test postal surveys as a primary recruitment method, analysing preliminary response rate data to inform the Study's ongoing sampling approach. Twenty thousand adults aged ≥16 years were sampled from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people enrolled in the Medicare Australia Enrolment Database. We calculated response rates at 4 and 15 weeks, overall and by age group, gender, state/territory and remoteness. The overall response rate was 2.3% (n = 456/20000). Highest response rates were observed among males and females ≥50 years from major cities (6.0, 95%CI 4.4-7.9 and 5.5%, 4.1-7.2, respectively) and regional areas (6.0%, 4.6-7.6 and 6.2%, 4.9-7.7, respectively). Younger age groups and remote areas had lower response rates; all remote age groups < 50 years had a response rate ≤ 0.6%. While most participants responded on the paper surveys, online responses were more common among younger age groups and, respondents with higher education levels and whose first language was not English. Using a postal survey, we observed response rates of ≥5.5% among older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults in major cities and regional areas; response rates were lower in other groups. A two-stage postal distribution approach provided an opportunity to adapt sampling approaches to different demographic groups. Based on initial response rates, the sampling strategy was revised to send postal surveys to groups with higher response rates groups and focus field recruitment strategies on low response groups.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Evidence on the effectiveness of postal recruitment methods for Indigenous peoples is lacking. Mayi Kuwayu, the National Study of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Wellbeing, uses multi-staged sampling. We aimed to test postal surveys as a primary recruitment method, analysing preliminary response rate data to inform the Study's ongoing sampling approach.
METHODS
Twenty thousand adults aged ≥16 years were sampled from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people enrolled in the Medicare Australia Enrolment Database. We calculated response rates at 4 and 15 weeks, overall and by age group, gender, state/territory and remoteness.
RESULTS
The overall response rate was 2.3% (n = 456/20000). Highest response rates were observed among males and females ≥50 years from major cities (6.0, 95%CI 4.4-7.9 and 5.5%, 4.1-7.2, respectively) and regional areas (6.0%, 4.6-7.6 and 6.2%, 4.9-7.7, respectively). Younger age groups and remote areas had lower response rates; all remote age groups < 50 years had a response rate ≤ 0.6%. While most participants responded on the paper surveys, online responses were more common among younger age groups and, respondents with higher education levels and whose first language was not English.
CONCLUSION
Using a postal survey, we observed response rates of ≥5.5% among older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults in major cities and regional areas; response rates were lower in other groups. A two-stage postal distribution approach provided an opportunity to adapt sampling approaches to different demographic groups. Based on initial response rates, the sampling strategy was revised to send postal surveys to groups with higher response rates groups and focus field recruitment strategies on low response groups.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32522151
doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-00970-8
pii: 10.1186/s12874-020-00970-8
pmc: PMC7285609
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
149Subventions
Organisme : Lowitja Institute
ID : 1344
Pays : International
Organisme : National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (FR)
ID : 1122273
Pays : International
Références
Int J Epidemiol. 2008 Oct;37(5):941-7
pubmed: 17881411
Women Health. 1998;28(1):23-40
pubmed: 10022055
BMJ. 2002 May 18;324(7347):1183
pubmed: 12016181
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 27;8(6):e023861
pubmed: 29950481
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 19;18(1):982
pubmed: 30567564
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2003 Mar 6;3(1):1
pubmed: 12659639
J Clin Epidemiol. 2002 Nov;55(11):1119-25
pubmed: 12507676
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2009 Aug;33(4):325-31
pubmed: 19689592
Int J Epidemiol. 2005 Oct;34(5):987-91
pubmed: 15894591
Lancet. 2016 Jul 9;388(10040):131-57
pubmed: 27108232
BMC Public Health. 2013 Jul 17;13:661
pubmed: 23866062
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2013 Apr;37(2):124-31
pubmed: 23551470
Med J Aust. 2003 Jan 6;178(1):43; discussion 43
pubmed: 12492391
Aust Health Rev. 2018 Jun;42(3):348-355
pubmed: 28578755
BMC Public Health. 2010 May 28;10:287
pubmed: 20507632
Med J Aust. 2015 Jun 1;202(10):S5-12
pubmed: 26017257
Aust Health Rev. 2008 Nov;32(4):626-38
pubmed: 18980558
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2000 Aug;24(4):444-9
pubmed: 11011476
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Nov 16;12:133
pubmed: 23157943
J Clin Epidemiol. 1997 Oct;50(10):1129-36
pubmed: 9368521